Deciduous Molar Microwear of South African Australopithecines

  • F. E. Grine

Abstract

Are the cranial, dental and mandibular differences between ‘gracile’ (Australopithecus africanus) and ‘robust’ (A. robustus, A. crassidens and A. boisei) autralopithecines merely allometric correlates of increased body size, or do they reflect adaptations to different dietary regimens? The question of diet is central to the construction of models of early hominid ecology and evolution, because dietary considerations bear directly upon trophic adaptations, musculo-skeletal developments associated with food acquisition, and perhaps also upon inter-specific relationships. The dietary proclivities of the australopithecines have been the subject of considerable debate, with arguments for and against various hypotheses stemming from multifarious approaches (see Grine, 1981 for a review of the literature). One of the more potentially useful approaches is the evaluation of the microscopic details of occlusal wear facets (Walker, 1979, 1980, 1981; Walker et al., 1978).

Keywords

Occlusal Surface Occlusal Plane Early Hominid Primate Taxon Centric Occlusion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brace, C.L. (1967) “The Stages of Human Evolution.” Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  2. Covert, H.H. and Kay, R.F. (1981) Dental microwear and diet: implications for determining the feeding behaviors of extinct primates, with a comment on the dietary pattern of Sivapithecus. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 55: 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Grine, F.E. (1977) Analysis of early hominid deciduous molar wear by scanning electron microscopy: a preliminary report. Proc. electron microsc. Soc. Sthn. Afr. 7: 157–158.Google Scholar
  4. Grine, F.E. (1981) Trophic differences between ‘gracile’ and ’robust’ australopithecines: a scanning electron microscope analysis of occlusal events. S. Afr. J. Sci. 77: 203–230.Google Scholar
  5. Grine, F.E. (1982) A new juvenile hominid (Mammalia: Primates) from Member 3, Kromdraai Formation, Transvaal, South Africa. Ann. Transv. Mus. 33: 165–239.Google Scholar
  6. Hiiemae, K.M. (1978) Mammalian mastication: a review of the activity of the jaw muscles and the movements they produce in chewing. In “Development, Function and Evolution of Teeth” ( P.M. Butler and K.A. Joysey, eds.), pp. 359–398. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  7. Kay, R.F. (1975) The functional adaptations of primate molar teeth. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 43: 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kay, R.F. (1978) Molar structure and diet in extant Cercopithecidae. In “Development, Function and Evolution of Teeth” ( P.M. Butler and K.A. Joysey, eds.), pp. 309–339. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  9. Kay, R.F. and Hiiemae, K.M. (1974) Jaw movement and tooth use in recent and fossil primates. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 40: 227–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kinzey, W.G. (1978) Feeding behaviour and molar features in two species of titi monkey. In “Recent Advances in Primatology, vol. 1, Behaviour” ( D.J. Chivers and J. Herbert, eds.), pp. 373–385. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  11. Peters, C.R. (1981) Robust vs. gracile early hominid masticatory capabilities: the advantages of the megadonts. In “The Perception of Human Evolution” ( L.L. Mai, E. Shanklin and R.W. Susman, eds.), pp. 161–181. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  12. Pilbeam, D. and Gould, S.J. (1974) Size and scaling in human evolution. Science 186: 892–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Robinson, J.T. (1954) The genera and species of the Australo- pithecinae. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 12: 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sheine, W.S. and Kay, R.F. (1977) An analysis of chewed food particle size and its relation to molar structure in the primates Cheirogaleus medius and Galago senegalensis and the insectivoran Tupia guis. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 47: 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tobias, P.V. (1967) “The Cranium and Maxillary Dentition of Australopithecus (Zinjanthropus) boisei.” Olduvai Gorge, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Walker, A.C. (1978) Functional anatomy of oral tissues: mastication and deglutition. In “Textbook of Oral Biology” ( J. Shaw, E. Sweeney, C. Cappuccino and S. Meller, eds.), pp. 227–296. W.B. Saunders, London.Google Scholar
  17. Walker, A.C. (1979) S.E.M. analysis of microwear and its correlation with dietary patterns. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 50: 489.Google Scholar
  18. Walker, A.C. (1980) Functional anatomy and taphonomy. In “Fossils in the Making” ( A.K. Behrensmeyer and A. Hill, eds.), pp. 182–196. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  19. Walker, A.C. (1981) Dietary hypotheses and human evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, 292: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Walker, A.C., Hoeck, H. and Perez, L.M. (1978) Microwear of mammalian teeth as an indicator of diet. Science 201: 908–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wallace, J.A. (1978) Evolutionary trends in the early hominid dentition. In “Early Hominids of Africa” ( C. Jolly, ed.), pp. 285–310. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  22. Wolpoff, M.H. (1974) The evidence for two australopithecine lineages in South Africa. Yrbk. phys. Anthrop. 17: 113–139.Google Scholar
  23. Wood, B.A. (1979) Analysis of tooth and body size relationships in five primate taxa. Folia primatot. 31: 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ood, B.A. and Stack, C.G. (1980) Does allometry explain the differences between “gracile” and “robust” australopithecines? Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 52: 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. E. Grine
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyState University of New YorkStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations