Chewing It over: Basic Principles of Food Breakdown

  • P. W. Lucas
  • D. A. Luke


In order to meet their metabolic needs, mammals achieve a faster rate of digestion by adding oral processing of solids to the sequence of digestive processes which occur further down the gut. They presumably evolved a mechanical system, rather than increasing the length of their guts, because the cost of mechanical processing is less than the cost of carrying around very large quantities of food. Since increased locomotor activity accompanied, and may have depended on, an increased metabolic rate in comparison to reptiles (Martin, 1980), an increase in inert bulk is not a good solution to the problem.


Scalpel Blade Tooth Size Soft Food Amelogenesis Imperfecta Tooth Shape 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Clutton-Brock, T.H. and Harvey, P.H. (1977) Species differences in feeding and ranging behaviour in primates. In “Feeding Ecology” ( T.H. Clutton-Brock, ed.), pp. 557–584. Academic, London.Google Scholar
  2. Crompton, A.W. and Sita-Lumsden, A.G. (1970) Functional significance of therian molar patterns. Nature 227: 678–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Epstein, B. (1947) The mathematical description of certain breakage mechanisms leading to the logarithmico-normal distribution. J. Franklin Inst. 244: 471–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Freeman, P.W. (1979) Specialised insectivory: beetle-eating and moth-eating molossid bats. J. Mammal. 60: 467–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gardner, R.P. and Austin, L.G. (1962) A chemical engineering treatment of batch grinding. In “Zeinerkleinen Symposion” (H. Rumpf, ed. ), pp. 217–248.Google Scholar
  6. Verlag Chemie, Dusseldorf. Gaudin, A.M. and Meloy, T.P. (1962) Model and a comminution equation for single fracture. A.I.M. E. Trans. 223: 40–43.Google Scholar
  7. Grine, F.E. (1981) Trophic differences between ‘gracile’ and ’robust’ australopithecines: a scanning electron microscope analysis of occlusal events. S. Afr. J. Sci. 77: 203–230.Google Scholar
  8. Harvey, P.H., Kavanagh, M. and Clutton-Brock, T.H. (1978) Sexual dimorphism in primate teeth. J. Zool. (Lond.) 186: 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayes, M.H. (1968) “Veterinary Notes for Horse Owners”, 16th Edn. Paul, London.Google Scholar
  10. Hiiemae, K. (1978) Mammalian mastication: a review of the activity of the jaw muscles and the movements they produce in chewing. In “Development, Function and Evolution of Teeth” ( P.M. Butler and K.A. Joysey, eds.), pp. 359–398. Academic, London.Google Scholar
  11. Jolly, C.J. (1970) The seed eaters: a new model of hominid differentiation. Man 5: 1–26.Google Scholar
  12. Kay, R.F. (1975) Allometry and early hominids. Science 189: 63.Google Scholar
  13. Lucas, P.W. (1979) The dental-dietary adaptations of mammals. N. Jb. Geol. Palëont. Mh. 8: 486–512.Google Scholar
  14. Lucas, P.W. (1980) Biomaterials as foods. In “The Mechanical Properties of Biological Materials” (J.F. V. Vincent and J.D. Currey, eds. ), pp. 463–464.Google Scholar
  15. Cambridge Univ. Press. Luke, D.A. and Lucas, P.W. (1982) The significance of cusps. J. Oral Rehab. (in press).Google Scholar
  16. Maier, W. (1980) Konstruktionsmorphologie Untersuchungen am Gebiss der rezenten Prosimiae (Primates). Abh. senckenb. naturforsch. Ges. 538: 1–158.Google Scholar
  17. Martin, R.D. (1980) Body temperature, activity and energy costs. Nature 283: 335–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Osborn, J.W. and Lumsden, A.G.S. (1978) An alternative to “thegosis” and a re-examination of the ways in which mammalian molars work. N. Jb. Palaeont. Abh. 156: 371–392.Google Scholar
  19. Pilbeam, D. and Gould, S.J. (1975) Size and scaling in human evolution. Science 186: 892–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rensberger, J.M. (1973a) Sanctimus (Mammalia, Rodentia) and the phyletic relationships of the large Arikareean geomyoids. J. Paleont. 47: 835–853.Google Scholar
  21. Rensberger, J.M. (1973b) An occlusion model for mastication and dental wear in herbivorous mammals. J. Paleont. 47: 515528.Google Scholar
  22. Vincent, J.F.V. (1982) “Structural Biomaterials”. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  23. Wainwright, S.A., Biggs, W.D., Currey, J.D. and Gosline, J.M. (1976) “Mechanical Design in Organisms”. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  24. Wood, B.A. (1979) An analysis of tooth and body size relationships in five primate taxa. Folia primatol. 31: 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yurkstas, A.A. and Manly, R.S. (1950) Value of different test foods in estimating masticatory ability. J. Appl. Physiol. 3: 45–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. W. Lucas
    • 1
  • D. A. Luke
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit of Anatomy in relation to DentistryGuy’s Hospital Medical SchoolUK

Personalised recommendations