Flight 427 pp 55-71 | Cite as

We have a Problem

  • Gerry Byrne


On the afternoon of Wednesday, July 29, 1992, nearly a year and a half after the crash of Flight 585, Ron Schleede received a phone call that made him very angry. The caller told Schleede, who was chief of the Major Investigations branch of the NTSB, that a Boeing 737 rudder problem was being independently investigated by United Airlines—that is, the airline was conducting an investigation without reporting it to, or sharing any information with, the NTSB. Besides United, this “private” investigation involved Parker Hannifin, the company that produced many of the hydraulic components fitted to the 737. Parker Hannifin had just confirmed to United that under certain conditions a hydraulic component in the 737’s rudder mechanism could unexpectedly force the rudder into maximum deflection, a so-called hardover. Schleede was furious that no one had thought this information was important enough to share with Al Dickinson, who headed the 585 investigation and reported to Schleede. Although there was no direct evidence that a full rudder deflection drove Flight 585 into its final inverted S-shaped curve into Widefield Park, everyone involved in the investigation knew, or should have known, that the “hardover hypothesis” was perhaps the simplest and clearest explanation for what had happened.


Flight Control Hydraulic Fluid Servo Valve Hydraulic Component Safety Recommendation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerry Byrne

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations