The Movements of a Marine Copepod in a Tidal Lagoon

  • Ivan T. ShowJr.
Part of the Marine Science book series (MR, volume 11)


It has been hypothesized that marine copepods are able to react to water movements in an estuary in such a way as to minimize ad-vective losses to the open ocean. This hypothesis is developed mathematically and tested by use of a stochastic model. Several processes are investigated as contributing to the minimization of advective loss.

The model treats time-varying spatial patterns of marine plankton. In the present instance, the model is used to describe the movements of Acartia tonsa (Copepoda) in a tidal lagoon on the eastern end of Galveston Island, Texas. Four distinct processes are considered: advection by currents, behavioral response to environmental variables (current velocity, temperature, and salinity fields), intraspecific aggregation, and birth-death processes. The portion of the model dealing with biological processes is a stochastic compartmental model. The biological model is driven by a three-dimensional physical dynamic model which provides numerical solutions for current velocity, temperature, and salinity fields.

The coupled physical-biological model used to simulate the distribution of A. tonsa provided numerically accurate estimates for the time histories of the physical and biological processes involved. The success of the model was probably attributable to a number of factors which involve the nature of the ecological situation modeled, the form of the parameters in the biological model, the manner in which the lagoon was compartmentalized, and the nature of the sampling data used to test the results.

Assuming then that the results of the numerical simulation were accurate by other than random chance, the most important conclusion was that A. tonsa appears to owe its spatial distribution in the lagoon to the combined effects of advection by currents and behavioral response to environmental stimuli: tides, light, temperature gradients, salinity gradients, and the population density gradients of its own species; the most important being tidal advection. It also appears that the resultant movements of the organism are sufficient to minimize losses from the lagoon to the extent that it maintains an endemic population inside the lagoon which is distinct from the population found immediately outside. Finally, it was concluded that the spatial distribution of A. tonsa is heterogenous, that the patches are of the order of 240 metres long by one or two metres deep, and that changes in density occur as a result of an increase in within-patch density rather than an increase in the number of patches.


Current Velocity Salinity Gradient Biological Model Water Surface Elevation Salinity Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnold, E. L., R. S. Wheeler, and K. N. Baxter. 1960. Observations on fishes and other biota of East Lagoon, Galveston Island. U. S. Fish and Wild. Serv., Spec. Sci. Rep., Fisheries #344.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, J. P. 1955. Physical and biological processes determining the distribution of Zooplankton in a tidal estuary. Biol. Bull. 109: 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, H. and S. M. Marshall. 1951. On the variability of replicate plankton samples and some applications of contagious series to the statistical distribution of catches over restricted periods. Bull. Bingham Mar. Biol. Assoc. 30: 233–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bary, B. M. 1963a. Distribution of Atlantic pelagic organisms in relation to surface water bodies. Roy. Soc. Canada Spec. Pubs. 5: 51–67.Google Scholar
  5. Bary, B. M. 1963b. Temperature, salinity, and plankton in the eastern North Atlantic and coastal waters. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada. 20: 789–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bary, B. M. 1963c. Temperature, salinity, and plankton in the eastern North Atlantic and coastal waters of Britain, 1957. II. The relationship between species and water bodies. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada. 20: 1031–1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bary, B. M. 1963d. Temperature, salinity, and plankton in the eastern North Atlantic and coastal waters of Britain, 1957. III. The distribution of Zooplankton in relation to water bodies. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada. 20: 1519–1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bary, B. M. 1964. Temperature, salinity, and plankton in the eastern North Atlantic and coastal waters of Britain, 1957. IV. Its role in distribution and in selecting and using indicator species. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada. 21: 183–202.Google Scholar
  9. Bary, B. M. 1967. Diel vertical migrations of underwater scattering, mostly in Saanich Inlet, British Columbia. Deep-Sea Res. 14: 35–52.Google Scholar
  10. Breder, C. M., Jr. 1954. Equations descriptive of fish schools and other animal aggregations. Ecology 35: 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassie, R. M. 1959a. An experimental study of factors inducing aggregation in marine plankton. N.Z.J. Sci. 2: 239–365.Google Scholar
  12. Cassie, R. M. 1959b. Microdistribution of plankton. N.Z.J. Sci. 2: 398–409.Google Scholar
  13. Cassie, R. M. 1960. Factors influencing the distribution pattern of plankton in the mixing zone between oceanic and harbour waters. N.Z.J. Sci. 3: 26–50.Google Scholar
  14. Cassie, R. M. 1962. Frequency distribution models in the ecology of plankton and other organisms. J. Anim. Ecol. 7: 121–130.Google Scholar
  15. Fasham, J. J. R., M. V. Angel, and H. S. J. Roe. 1974. An investigation of the spatial pattern of Zooplankton using the Longhurst-Hardy plankton recorder. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 16: 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, R. A. 1943. Relation between number of species and individuals in samples. J. Anim. Ecol. 12: 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fleminger, A. 1959. East Lagoon Zooplankton. U. S. Fish and Wildl. Ser. Circ. 62: 114–118.Google Scholar
  18. Harder, W. 1968. Reactions of plankton organisms to water stratification. Limno. Oceanogr. 13: 156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hardy, A. C. and E. R. Gunther. 1935. The plankton of the South Georgia whaling grounds and adjacent waters, 1926–27. Discovery Rep. 11: 1–456.Google Scholar
  20. Hutchinson, G. E. 1953. The concept of pattern in ecology. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 105: 1–12.Google Scholar
  21. Jacobs, J. 1968. Animal behavior and water movements as codeterminants of plankton distribution in a tidal system. Sarsia 34: 355–370.Google Scholar
  22. Ketchum, B. H. 1954. Relation between circulation and planktonic populations in estuaries. Ecology 35: 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lance, J. 1962. Effects of water of reduced salinity on the vertical migration of Zooplankton. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 42: 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leendertse, J. J. and S-K Liu. 1975. A three dimensional model for estuaries and coastal seas. Vol. II, Aspects of Computation. R-1764-OWRT Rand Corp., Santa Monica, Ca.Google Scholar
  25. Lieberman, L. 1951. Effect of temperature inhomogeneities in the ocean on the propagation of sound. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 23: 563–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marvin, K. T., L. M. Lansford, and R. S. Wheeler. 1961. Effects of copper on the ecology of a lagoon. Fish. Full. 61: 153–159.Google Scholar
  27. McNaught, D. C. and A. D. Hasler. 1964. Rate of movement of populations of Daphnia in relation to changes in light intensity. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada. 21: 291–318.Google Scholar
  28. Pielou, E. C. 1969. An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. Wiley-Interscience, N. Y.Google Scholar
  29. Pierce, E. L. 1939. Sagitta as an indicator of water movements in the Irish Sea. Nature 144: 784–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Powell, T. M., P. J. Richardson, T. M. Dillon, B. A. Agee, B. J. Dozier, D. A. Godden, and L. O. Myrup. 1975. Spatial scales of current speed and phytoplankton biomass fluctuations in Lake Tahoe. Science 189: 1088–1089.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ragotzkie, R. A. 1953. Correlation of currents with the distribution of adult Daphnia in Lake Mendota. J. Mar. Res. 12: 157–172.Google Scholar
  32. Riley, G. A. 1976. A model of plankton patchiness. Limno. Oceanogr. 21: 873–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Russell, F. S. 1935. On the value of certain plankton animals as indicators of water movements in the English Channel and North Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 20: 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Russell, F. S. 1939. Hydrographical and biological conditions in the North Sea as indicated by plankton organisms. J. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer 14: 171–192.Google Scholar
  35. Show, I. T. 1977. A spatial modeling approach to pelagic ecosystems. Ph.D. Dissertation. Texas A & M University, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
  36. Stavn, R. H. 1971. The horizontal-vertical distribution hypothesis: Langmuir circulation and Daphnia distributions. Limno. Oceanogr. 16: 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stickney, R. R. and S. C. Knowles. 1975. Summer Zooplankton distribution in a Georgia Estuary. Mar. Biol. 33: 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thakur, A. K. and A. Rescigno. 1978. On the stochastic theory of compartments. III. General, time-dependent reversible systems. Bull. Math. Biol. 40: 237–246.Google Scholar
  39. Trinast, E. M. 1975. Tidal currents and Acartia distribution in Newport Bay, California. Estuarine and Coastal Mar. Sci. 3: 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wiebe, P. H. 1970. Small-scale spatial distribution in oceanic Zooplankton. Limno. Oceanogr. 15: 265–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan T. ShowJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Science Applications, Inc.La JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations