Skip to main content

Symmetry or Asymmetry in European Dollar Policies?

Evidence from the Core Countries

  • Chapter
EMU, Financial Markets and the World Economy

Abstract

As of 1 January 1999, the introduction of the euro has brought about the definite vanishing of independent fluctuations in the national European ex­change rates with the US dollar. As a consequence, the economies in the European Monetary Union (EMU) have given up a potential means for ab­sorbing asymmetric shocks not only inside EMU, but also with the rest of the world. In other words, a unique euro-dollar exchange rate is less likely to manage shocks between the two sides of the Atlantic that spread asymmetri­cally across Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amisano, G. and C. Giannini (1997), Topics in Structural VAR Econometrics. Heidelberg and New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. J. and D. Quah (1989), “The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances”, American Economic Review, 79: 655–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canova F. (1995), “Vector Autoregressive Models: Specification, Estimation, Inference, and Forecasting,” in Handbook of Applied Econometrics, M. H. Pesaran and M. Wickens, eds. Oxford and Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsetti G. and P. Pesenti (1998), “Welfare and Macroeconomic Interdepence,” NBER working paper no. 6307.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe, P. (1996), The Economics of Monetaly Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Giovane, P. and A. Pozzolo (1998), “The Behaviour of the Dollar and Exchange Rates in Europe: Empirical Evidence and Possible Explanations,” Banca d’Italia Terni di Discussione no. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornbush, R. (1976), “Expectations and Exchange Rate Dynamics,” Journal of Political Economy, 84: 1161–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, C. (1993), “Is Exchange Rate Variability caused by Relative Price Changes? An empirical Investigation,” Journal of International Economics, 32: 305–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J.A. and S. Wei (1993), “Trade Blocs and Currency Blocs,” NBER Working Paper no. 4335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gali, J. (1992), “How Well Does the IS-LM Model Fit Post-War US Data?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 709–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. (1994), Time Series Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hau, H. Forthcoming, “Exchange rate determination: the role of factor price rigidities and nontradables,” Journal of International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knetter, M. (1993), “International Comparisons of Pricing to Market Behavior,” American Economic Review, 83: 473–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane P. R. (1999), “The New Open economy Macroeconomics: a Survey,” CEPR Discussion Paper no. 2115. Forthcoming in the Journal of International Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussa M. (1986), “Nominal Exchange Rate Regimes and the Behavior of Real exchange Rates: Evidence and Implications,” Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy, 25: 117214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld M. and K. Rogoff (1995), “Exchange Rate Dynamics Redux,” Journal of Political Economy, 103: 624–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld M. and K. Rogoff (1996), Foundations of International Macroeconomics. Cambridge, Mass. and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro. M. D. and M. W. Watson (1988), “Sources of Business Cycle Fluctuations,” NBER Working Paper no. 2589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. (1980), “Macroeconomics and Reality,” Econometrica, 48: 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tille, C. (1998), “The role of consumption substitutability in the international transmission of shocks,” mimeo, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M. W. (1994), “Vector Autoregression and Cointegration,” in Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. IV, R. F. Engle and D. L. McFadden, eds. Amsterdam; London and New York: Elsevier, North Holland, pp. 2843–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, S. J. (1998), “Intra-national versus international trade: how stubborn are nations in global integration?” NBER working paper no. 5531.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cavallari, L., De Arcangelis, G. (2001). Symmetry or Asymmetry in European Dollar Policies?. In: Moser, T., Schips, B. (eds) EMU, Financial Markets and the World Economy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5131-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5131-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5012-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5131-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics