Getting Fit for the EU

A Currency Board for Poland
  • Andreas Freytag


After a more or less successful transition period, some Central European countries, among these Poland, are knocking on EU’s door. Negotiations are already under way, and there can be no doubt that EU-enlargement will finally take place. Full membership of new member countries in the European Union implies the eventual accession to EMU. For this purpose, low inflation and exchange rate stability for at least two years is a prerequisite. Apart from the wish to access EMU, price stability is beneficial as such. Only with price stability the mechanism of relative prices can work without distortions.


Monetary Policy Central Bank Fiscal Policy European Central Bank Capital Inflow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balassa, Bela (1964), “The Purchasing-Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal,” Journal of Political Economy, 584–96.Google Scholar
  2. Balino, Thomas J. T. and Chalres Enoch (1997), “Currency Board Arrangements - Issues and Experiences,” IMF Occasional Paper no. 127.Google Scholar
  3. Barro, Robert J. and David B. Gordon (1983), “Rules, Discretion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 12: 101–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Begg, David (1997), “Monetary Policy During Transition: Progress and Pitfalls in Central and Eastern Europe, 1990–6,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 13: 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, Adam G.G. (1993), “The Operation of the Estonian Currency Board,” IMF Staff Papers, 40: 451–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, Adam G.G. (1994), “Currency Boards: Issues and Experiences, `IMF Papers on Policy Analysis and Assessment no. PPAA/94/18.Google Scholar
  7. Blackburn, Keith and Michael Christensen (1989), “Monetary Policy and Policy Credibility: Theories and Evidence,” Journal of Economic Literature, 27: 1–45.Google Scholar
  8. Bonin, John P. et al. (1998), Banking in transition economies: Developing market oriented Google Scholar
  9. banking sectors in Eastern Europe. Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, Mass.: Elgar. Bornstein, Morris (1997), “Non-Standard Methods in the Privatization Strategies of the CzechGoogle Scholar
  10. Republic, Hungary and Poland,“ Economics of Transition,5:323–38.Google Scholar
  11. Buch, Claudia M. (1996), Creating efficient banking systems: Theory and evidence from Eastern Europe. Tubingen: Mohr (Siebeck).Google Scholar
  12. Buch, Claudia M. et aI. (1994), Overcoming Obstacles to Successful Reforms in Economies in Transition. Tubingen: Mohr (Siebeck).Google Scholar
  13. Budina, Nina and Sweder van Wjinbergen (1997), “Fiscal Policies in Eastern Europe,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 13: 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cavallo, Domingo F. (1993), “The Convertibility Plan,” in Proceedings of a Conference on Currency Substitution and Currency Boards, Nissan Liviatan, ed. World Bank Discussion Papers no. 207, pp. 37–40.Google Scholar
  15. Cukierman, Alex (1992), Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dluhosch, Barbara, Andreas Freytag and Malte Krüger (1996), International Competitiveness and the Balance of Payments: Do Current Account Deficits and Surpluses Matter? Cheltenham, U.K.: Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. Donges, Juergen B. and Jürgen Wieners (1994), “Foreign Investment in the Transformation Process of Eastern Europe,” International Trade Journal, 8: 163–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freytag, Andreas (1998), “Einige Anmerkungen zur Wahl der Reservewährung eines Currency Boards,” Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, 47: 3–19.Google Scholar
  19. Greenwood John (1983), “The Stabilisation of the Hong Kong Dollar,” Asian Monetary Monitor no. 6, 2–12.Google Scholar
  20. Greenwood, John (1988a), “Response to Dr. Jao,” Asian Monetary Monitor no. 6, 7–12.Google Scholar
  21. Greenwood, John (1988b), “Hong Kong’s Monetary System,” Asian Monetary Monitor no. 1, 1–13.Google Scholar
  22. Greenwood, John (1995), “Hong Kong: The Debate on the Optimum Monetary System,” Asian Monetary Monitor no. 2, 1–5.Google Scholar
  23. Hanke, Steve H. (1996), “A Tale of Two Pesos: A Comparison of Currency Policies In Mexico and Argentina,” The Heritage Lectures 552.Google Scholar
  24. Hanke, Steve H. and Kurt Schuler (1994), “Currency Boards for Developing Countries,” International Center for Economic Growth, Sector Study no. 9.Google Scholar
  25. International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Economic Outlook,published twice a year, Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  26. Lucas, Robert E. Jr. (1996), “Nobel Lecture: Monetary Neutrality,” Journal of Political Economy, 104: 661–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Masson, Paul R. (1999), Monetary and Exchange Rate Policy of Transition Economies of Central and Eastern Europe after the Launch of the EMU,“ IMF Policy Discussion Paper no. 99/5.Google Scholar
  28. Mastroberardino, Mônica Graciela (1994), Kapitalflucht: Die Erfahrungen Argentiniens 1976–92. Köln.Google Scholar
  29. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1998), “Poland,” Economic Surveys. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  30. Polish Embassy (1996–97), Poland’s 1997 Constitution: Summary of Key Positions, Scholar
  31. Roland, Gerard (1994), “The Role of Political Constraints in Transition Strategies,” Economics of Transition, 2: 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schadler, Susan, Maria Carkovic, Adam Bennett and Robert Kahn (1993), “RecentGoogle Scholar
  33. Experiences with Surges in Capital Inflows,“ IMF Occasional Paper no. 108.Google Scholar
  34. Schuler, Kurt (1992), Currency Boards. Dissertation at the George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia. Statistisches Bundesamt ( 1996 ), Länderbericht Polen, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  35. The Economist (1997a), “Fragile, Handle with Care. A Survey about Banking in Emerging Markets,” April 12.Google Scholar
  36. The Economist (1997b), “The Great Escape: How Do You Say Goodbye to a Currency Board? The More Stable the Economy, the Easier the Answer,” May 3.Google Scholar
  37. Tkaczynski, Jan Wiktor and Klaus Mühlbauer (1998), “Die Problem des polnischen Geld-und Bankensystems in der Transformation,” Osteuropa-Wirtschaft, 174–202.Google Scholar
  38. Tumlir, Jan (1985), Protectionism. Washington D.0Google Scholar
  39. Ugolini, Piero (1996), “National Bank of Poland: The Road to Indirect Instruments,” IMF Occasional Paper no. 144.Google Scholar
  40. Vaubel, Roland (1991), “A Public Choice View of International Organization,” in The Political Economy of International Organizations, Roland Vaubel and Thomas D. Willett, eds. Boulder and Oxford: Westview Press, 27–45.Google Scholar
  41. Wescott, R. et al. (1999), “Republic of Poland: Selected Issues,” IMF Staff Country Reports no. 99 /32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Freytag
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CologneGermany

Personalised recommendations