Abstract
Switzerland is a confederation of 23 states, called cantons, three of which are subdivided into half-cantons for administrative purposes. The powers of decision making are usually organised from the bottom upwards. In accordance with the ‘subsidiarity principle’, the Confederation only assumes responsibility for duties which the cantons are unable to carry out themselves. Thus the 26 cantons which make up the Federal State have a certain degree of sovereignty, and possess their own political institutions. Collegial government and therefore compromise are crucial factors in the political culture of the country. A number of years ago, cantons began, in co-operation with localities in other countries, to form regions which are primarity concerned with economic and infrastructural issues such as the siting of waste management plants. These regions as yet possess no political institutions of their own. One such region, Eastern Switzerland, comprising Schaffhausen, Uri, Zug, Zurich, Appenzell (divided in two), St Gallen, Thurgau, Glarus, Schwylz, Graubunden and Ticino, plus the Principality of Liechenstein, is the location for the case study outlined below.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Banville, C., Landry, M.,Martel, J.M., Boulaire, C. (1993) `A Stakeholder’s Approach to MCDA’, University Laval, CRAEDO, Working paper 93–77.
Guigou, J.L. (1971) `On French Location Models for Production Units’. Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 1, No. 2, pp 107–138.
Maystre, L., Pictet, J., and Simos, J. (1994) Methodes Multicriteres ELECTRE. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne.
Nijkamp, P. (1975) `A Multicriteria Analysis for project Evaluation: Economic–Ecological Evaluation of a Land Reclamation Project’. Papers of the Regional Science Association, Volume 35, pp 87–111.
Rogers, M.G., Bruen, M.P. (1996) `Using ELECTRE to Rank Options within an Environmental Appraisal–Two Case Studies’. Civil Engineering Systems, Vol. 13, pp 203–221.
Rogers and Bruen, (1997) `Threshold values for noise air and water impact criteria within the ELECTRE model’. Proceedings of the 46th Meeting of the European Working Group on Mullticriteria Aid forDecisions, Bastia, Corsica, 23rd to 24th October, 1997, Session 6.
Rogers and Bruen, (1998) `Choosing realistic values of indifference, preference and veto thresholds for use with environmental criteria within ELECTRE’. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 107, pp 542–551.
Roy, B. (1968) `Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples (la methode ELECTRE)’. Revue Francaise d ‘Automatique Information et Recherche Operationelle (RIRO). Volume 8, pp57–75.
Roy, B., Hugonnard, B. (1982) `Ranking of Suburban Line Extension Projects on the Paris Metro System by a Multicriteria Method’ Transportation Research Record, Volume 16A, No. 4, pp 301–312.
Siskos, J., Hubert, P. (1988) `Multicriteria Analysis of the Impacts of Energy Alternatives: A Survey and a New Approach’. European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 13, pp 278–299.
Van Delft, A., Nijkamp, P. (1977) Multicriteria Analysis and Regional Decision Making. Martinus Nijhoff Social Services Division, Leiden.
Vincke, P. (1992)MulticriteriaDecision Aid. John Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rogers, M., Bruen, M., Maystre, LY. (2000). Case Study 2. In: ELECTRE and Decision Support. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5057-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5057-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5108-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5057-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive