Skip to main content

Case Study 2

Choosing the Best Waste Incineration Strategy for the Eastern Switzerland Region

  • Chapter
ELECTRE and Decision Support

Abstract

Switzerland is a confederation of 23 states, called cantons, three of which are subdivided into half-cantons for administrative purposes. The powers of decision making are usually organised from the bottom upwards. In accordance with the ‘subsidiarity principle’, the Confederation only assumes responsibility for duties which the cantons are unable to carry out themselves. Thus the 26 cantons which make up the Federal State have a certain degree of sovereignty, and possess their own political institutions. Collegial government and therefore compromise are crucial factors in the political culture of the country. A number of years ago, cantons began, in co-operation with localities in other countries, to form regions which are primarity concerned with economic and infrastructural issues such as the siting of waste management plants. These regions as yet possess no political institutions of their own. One such region, Eastern Switzerland, comprising Schaffhausen, Uri, Zug, Zurich, Appenzell (divided in two), St Gallen, Thurgau, Glarus, Schwylz, Graubunden and Ticino, plus the Principality of Liechenstein, is the location for the case study outlined below.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Banville, C., Landry, M.,Martel, J.M., Boulaire, C. (1993) `A Stakeholder’s Approach to MCDA’, University Laval, CRAEDO, Working paper 93–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guigou, J.L. (1971) `On French Location Models for Production Units’. Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 1, No. 2, pp 107–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maystre, L., Pictet, J., and Simos, J. (1994) Methodes Multicriteres ELECTRE. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P. (1975) `A Multicriteria Analysis for project Evaluation: Economic–Ecological Evaluation of a Land Reclamation Project’. Papers of the Regional Science Association, Volume 35, pp 87–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M.G., Bruen, M.P. (1996) `Using ELECTRE to Rank Options within an Environmental Appraisal–Two Case Studies’. Civil Engineering Systems, Vol. 13, pp 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers and Bruen, (1997) `Threshold values for noise air and water impact criteria within the ELECTRE model’. Proceedings of the 46th Meeting of the European Working Group on Mullticriteria Aid forDecisions, Bastia, Corsica, 23rd to 24th October, 1997, Session 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers and Bruen, (1998) `Choosing realistic values of indifference, preference and veto thresholds for use with environmental criteria within ELECTRE’. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 107, pp 542–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. (1968) `Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples (la methode ELECTRE)’. Revue Francaise d ‘Automatique Information et Recherche Operationelle (RIRO). Volume 8, pp57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B., Hugonnard, B. (1982) `Ranking of Suburban Line Extension Projects on the Paris Metro System by a Multicriteria Method’ Transportation Research Record, Volume 16A, No. 4, pp 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskos, J., Hubert, P. (1988) `Multicriteria Analysis of the Impacts of Energy Alternatives: A Survey and a New Approach’. European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 13, pp 278–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Delft, A., Nijkamp, P. (1977) Multicriteria Analysis and Regional Decision Making. Martinus Nijhoff Social Services Division, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincke, P. (1992)MulticriteriaDecision Aid. John Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rogers, M., Bruen, M., Maystre, LY. (2000). Case Study 2. In: ELECTRE and Decision Support. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5057-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5057-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5108-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5057-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics