The Electre Methodology

  • Martin Rogers
  • Michael Bruen
  • Lucien-Yves Maystre
Chapter

Abstract

In July 1966, Bernard Roy presented a paper in Rome in which he used his formal training in Mathematics to develop a practical decision-making system, now known as ELECTRE. It involves a systematic analysis of the relationship between all possible pairings of the different options, based on each option’s scores on a set of common criteria of evaluation. The result is a measure of the degree to which each option outranks all others. The methodology entails the construction of an outranking relation, the generation of concordance and discordance indices (including the notion of relative importance of each criterion) and an analysis of the results obtained from an overall evaluation of all the outranking relationships derived.

Keywords

Concordance Index Ranking Procedure Preference Threshold Distillation Procedure Outrank Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brans, J.P. and Vincke, P. (1985) `A Preference Ranking Organisation Method’. Management Science, 31 (6), pp. 647–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Leclercq, J.P. (1984) `Propositions d’extension de la notion de dominance en presence de relations d’ordre sur les pseudo-criteres: MELCHIOR’. Revue Belge de Recherche Operationelle de Statistique et d ‘Informatique, 24 (1), pp. 32–46.Google Scholar
  3. Maystre, L., Pictet, J., and Simos, J. (1994) Methodes Multicriteres ELECTRE. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne.Google Scholar
  4. Roy, B. (1968) `Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples (la methode ELECTRE)’. Revue Informatique et Recherche Operationnelle. 2e Aimee, No. 8, pp 57–75.Google Scholar
  5. Roy, B. (1978) `ELECTRE III: Un algorithme de classements fonde sur une representation floue des preferences en presence de criteres multiples’ Cahiers de CERO, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
  6. Roy, B. and Bertier, P. (1971) `La methode ELECTRE II: Une methode de classement en presence de critteres multiples’. SEMA (Metra International), Direction Scientifique, Note de Travail No. 142, Paris, 25 p.Google Scholar
  7. Roy, B. and Bertier, P. (1973) `La methode ELECTRE II: Une application au media-planning’. In Ross, M. (ed.), Operational Research 1972, North-Holland Publishing Company, pp. 291–302.Google Scholar
  8. Roy, B. and Bouyssou, D. (1993) Aide Multicritere a la Decision: Methodes et Cas. Economica, Paris.Google Scholar
  9. Roy, B. and Hugonnard, J.–C. (1982) `Classement des prolongements de lignes de metro en banlieue parisienne (presentation d’une methode multicritere originale)’. Cahiers du CERO, Vol. 24, No. 2–3–4, pp. 153–171.Google Scholar
  10. Roy, B. and Skalka, J.M. (1985) `ELECTRE IS: Aspects methodologiques et guide d’utilisation’. Document de LAMSADE, No. 30, Universite Paris-Dauphine, 125pGoogle Scholar
  11. February. Vallee, D. and Zielniewicz, P (1994) `ELECTRE III-1V, version 3.x: Guide D’Utilisation’. Document de LAMSADE, No. 85, Universite Paris-Dauphine, 146p, July.Google Scholar
  12. Vincke, P.(1992)Multicriteria Decision Aid. John Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Yu, W. (1992) `ELECTRE Tri: Aspects methodologiques et manual d’utilisation’. Document de LAMSADE, No. 74, Universite Paris-Dauphine, 80p, April.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Rogers
  • Michael Bruen
  • Lucien-Yves Maystre

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations