Multi-Criteria Evaluation Methods

  • Martin Rogers
  • Michael Bruen
  • Lucien-Yves Maystre
Chapter

Abstract

There are a large number of multi-criteria methodologies for choosing between options for engineering and infrastructure investment projects. The main ones are:
  • Checklist Methods,

  • Multi-Attribute Utility methods (MAUT),

  • Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),

  • Concordance Analysis

Keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process Certainty Equivalent Project Option Concordance Analysis Simple Additive Weighting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adkins, W.G. and Burke, D. (1974) `Social, Economic and Environmental Factors in Highway Decision Making’. Research Report 148–4 Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A and M University, College Station, November.Google Scholar
  2. Belton, V. (1986) `A Comparison of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and a Simple Multi-Attribute Value Function’. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 26, pp 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benayoun, R., Roy, B. and Sussman, N. (1966) `Manual de Referance du Programme ELECTRE’. Note de Synthese et Formation, No. 25, Direction Scientifique SEMA, Paris. Canter, L.W. (1996) Environmental Impact Assessment. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Dee, N. (1972) Environmental Evaluation System for Water resources Planning. Final Report, Battelle-Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
  5. Dee, N.J. (1973) `Environmental Evaluation System for Water Resources Research’. Water Resources Research, Vol. 9, pp 523–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (1990) Environmental Impact Assessment — Guidelines for water resources Development. ST/ESCAP/786, United nations, New York, pp 19–48.Google Scholar
  7. Freeling, A.N.S. (1983) Belief and decision Making. PhD Thesis, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Guigou, J.L. (1971) `On French Location Models for Production Units’. Urban Economics, Vol. 1 (2), pp 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hokkanen, J. and Salminen, S. (1994) Choice of a Solid Waste Management System by Using the ELECTRE III Method. Applying MCDA for Decision to Environmental Management. (Ed. M. Paruccini), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland..Google Scholar
  10. Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, M.J. (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H. (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. WileyGoogle Scholar
  12. Massam, B. (1988) Spatial Search. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Miller, G.A. (1956) `The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits On Our Capacity For Processing Information’. The Psychological Review, Vol. 63, pp 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mousseau, V. (1995) Eliciting information concerning the relative importance of criteria. Advances in Multicriteria analysis (Pardalos, Y., Siskos, C. and Zopounidi, C. (eds.)), pp1743. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Odum, E.P. (1971) `Optimum Pathway Matrix Analysis Approach to the Environmental Decision Making Process — Test Case: Relative Impact of Proposed Highway Alternates’ Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
  16. Rogers, M.G., and Bruen, M.P. (1995) `Non-monetary Decision-Aid techniques in EIA - An Overview’. Paper 10746, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Municipal Engineer, 109, June, pp88–103.Google Scholar
  17. Rogers, M.G., and Bruen, M.P. (1998) `A New System for Weighting Criteria within Electre’. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 107, No. 3, pp. 552–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saaty, T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Saaty, T.L. (1977) `A Scaling for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures’. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, pp 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Simos, J. (1990) Evaluer L’Impact sur L’Environment Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, M.A. (1974) `Field Test of an Environmental Impact Assessment Methodology’. Report ERC-1574 Environmental Resources Centre, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta. Vincke, P. (1992) Multicriteria Decision Aid. John Wiley.Van Delft and Nijkamp, 1977Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Rogers
  • Michael Bruen
  • Lucien-Yves Maystre

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations