Skip to main content

Introduction to Multicriteria Decision Methods

  • Chapter
ELECTRE and Decision Support

Abstract

The proper planning of a major engineering system requires a set of procedures to be devised which ensures that available resources are allocated as efficiently as possible in its subsequent design and construction. This involves deciding how the available resources, including manpower, physical materials and finance can best be used to achieve the desired objectives of the project developer. Systems analysis can provide such a framework of procedures in which the fundamental issues of design and management can be addressed (de Neufville and Stafford, 1974). Engineering systems analysis provides an orderly process in which all factors relevant to the design and construction of major engineering projects can be considered. Use of the process has the following direct impacts on the coherent and logical development of such a project:

  • The process forces the developer to make explicit the objectives of the proposed system, together with how these objectives can be measured. This has the effect of heightening the developers awareness of his overall core objectives

  • It provides a framework in which alternative solutions will be readily generated as a means to selecting the most desired one

  • Appropriate methodologies for decision making will be proposed within the process for use in choosing between alternatives.

  • It will predict the major demands which will be placed on the facility under examination through the interaction of the various technical, environmental and social criteria generated by the process. These demands are not always detected in advance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bouyssou, D. (1990) `Building Criteria: A Prerequisite for MCDA’. In Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, pp58–80, ed. Bana e Costa, C., Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Banville, C., Landry, M.,Martel, J.M., Boulaire, C. (1993) `A Stakeholder’s Approach to MCDA’, University Laval, CRAEDO, Working paper 93–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, M.E. and Foster, C.D. (1965) `Victoria Line: Social Benefits and Finances’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, pp67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belton, V. and Vickers, S. (1990) `Use of a Simple Multi-Attribute Value Function Incorporating Visual Interactive Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Criteria Decision Making’. In Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, pp319–334, ed. Bana e Costa, C., Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, T.M., Beesley, M.E., Reynolds, D.J. (1960) The London - Birmingham Motorway.: Traffic and Economics, Road Research Laboratory, Technical Paper No. 46

    Google Scholar 

  • de Neufville, R. and Stafford, J. (1974) Systems Analysis for Engineers and Managers,McGraw Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, J. (1973) `Environmental Evaluation System for Water Resources Planning’ Water Resources Research, Volume 9, pp 523–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, A.D.J., (1972) `Choosing a Site for the Third London Airport: The Roskill Commission Approach’ In Cost BenefttAnalysis,R. Layard (ed), Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goicoechea, A., Hansen, D.R., Duckstein, L. (1982) Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guigou, J.L. (1971) `On French Location Models for Production Units’. Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 1, No. 2, pp 107–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. (1973) Planning for Multiple Objectives: An Approach to the Evaluation of Transportation Plans. Technion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. Raiffa, H. (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichfield, N. (1971) `Cost Benefit Analysis in Planning: A Critique of the Roskill Commission’ In Regional Studies, Volume 5, pp 157–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichfield, N., Kettle, P., Whitbread, M. (1975) Evaluation in the Planning Process. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maystre, L., Pictet, J., and Simos, J. (1994) Methodes Multicriteres ELECTRE. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P. (1975) `A Multicriteria Analysis for project Evaluation: Economic–Ecological Evaluation of a Land Reclamation Project’. Papers of the Regional Science Association, Volume 35, pp 87–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M.G. and Bruen, M.P. (1996) `Using ELECTRE to Rank Options within an Environmental Appraisal - Two Case Studies’. Civil Engineering Systems, Vol. 13, pp203221

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M.G. and Bruen, M.P. (1997) `Applying ELECTRE To an Option Choice Problem Within an Environmental Appraisal - Three Case Studies from the Republic of Ireland’. Proceedings of the International Conference on Methods and Applications of Multicriteria Decision Making, May 14th to 16th, Mons, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. (1968) `Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples (la methode ELECTRE)’. Revue Francaise d ‘Automatique Information et Recherche Operationelle (BIRO). Volume 8, pp 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. and Hugonnard, B. (1982) `Ranking of Suburban Line Extension Projects on the Paris Metro System by a Multi-criteria Method’ Transportation Research Record, Volume 16A, No. 4, pp 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. and McCord, M.R. (1996) Multicriteria Methodology for Decison Aiding,Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. (1977) ‘A Scaling for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures’. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Volume 15, pp 234–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. (1988) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Research Allocation,McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskos, J., Hubert, P. (1988) `Multi-criteria Analysis of the Impacts of Energy Alternatives: A Survey and a New Approach’. European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 13, pp 278–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, R.M. (1994) The Skilled Facilitator, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Delft, A., Nijkamp, P. (1977) Multi-criteria Analysis and Regional Decision Making. Martinus Nijhoff Social Services Division, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincke, P. (1992)Multi-criteria Decision Aid. John Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, K.P., Hwang, C-L (1995) Multiple Attribute Decision Making. An Introduction, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rogers, M., Bruen, M., Maystre, LY. (2000). Introduction to Multicriteria Decision Methods. In: ELECTRE and Decision Support. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5057-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5057-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5108-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5057-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics