Introduction to Multicriteria Decision Methods

  • Martin Rogers
  • Michael Bruen
  • Lucien-Yves Maystre
Chapter

Abstract

The proper planning of a major engineering system requires a set of procedures to be devised which ensures that available resources are allocated as efficiently as possible in its subsequent design and construction. This involves deciding how the available resources, including manpower, physical materials and finance can best be used to achieve the desired objectives of the project developer. Systems analysis can provide such a framework of procedures in which the fundamental issues of design and management can be addressed (de Neufville and Stafford, 1974). Engineering systems analysis provides an orderly process in which all factors relevant to the design and construction of major engineering projects can be considered. Use of the process has the following direct impacts on the coherent and logical development of such a project:
  • The process forces the developer to make explicit the objectives of the proposed system, together with how these objectives can be measured. This has the effect of heightening the developers awareness of his overall core objectives

  • It provides a framework in which alternative solutions will be readily generated as a means to selecting the most desired one

  • Appropriate methodologies for decision making will be proposed within the process for use in choosing between alternatives.

  • It will predict the major demands which will be placed on the facility under examination through the interaction of the various technical, environmental and social criteria generated by the process. These demands are not always detected in advance.

Keywords

Cost Benefit Analysis Multicriteria Decision Multicriteria Analysis Project Option Major Engineering Project 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bouyssou, D. (1990) `Building Criteria: A Prerequisite for MCDA’. In Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, pp58–80, ed. Bana e Costa, C., Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  2. Banville, C., Landry, M.,Martel, J.M., Boulaire, C. (1993) `A Stakeholder’s Approach to MCDA’, University Laval, CRAEDO, Working paper 93–77.Google Scholar
  3. Beesley, M.E. and Foster, C.D. (1965) `Victoria Line: Social Benefits and Finances’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, pp67–88.Google Scholar
  4. Belton, V. and Vickers, S. (1990) `Use of a Simple Multi-Attribute Value Function Incorporating Visual Interactive Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Criteria Decision Making’. In Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, pp319–334, ed. Bana e Costa, C., Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  5. Coburn, T.M., Beesley, M.E., Reynolds, D.J. (1960) The London - Birmingham Motorway.: Traffic and Economics, Road Research Laboratory, Technical Paper No. 46Google Scholar
  6. de Neufville, R. and Stafford, J. (1974) Systems Analysis for Engineers and Managers,McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
  7. Dee, J. (1973) `Environmental Evaluation System for Water Resources Planning’ Water Resources Research, Volume 9, pp 523–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flowerdew, A.D.J., (1972) `Choosing a Site for the Third London Airport: The Roskill Commission Approach’ In Cost BenefttAnalysis,R. Layard (ed), Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. Goicoechea, A., Hansen, D.R., Duckstein, L. (1982) Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Guigou, J.L. (1971) `On French Location Models for Production Units’. Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 1, No. 2, pp 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill, M. (1973) Planning for Multiple Objectives: An Approach to the Evaluation of Transportation Plans. Technion.Google Scholar
  12. Keeney, R. Raiffa, H. (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  13. Lichfield, N. (1971) `Cost Benefit Analysis in Planning: A Critique of the Roskill Commission’ In Regional Studies, Volume 5, pp 157–183.Google Scholar
  14. Lichfield, N., Kettle, P., Whitbread, M. (1975) Evaluation in the Planning Process. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  15. Maystre, L., Pictet, J., and Simos, J. (1994) Methodes Multicriteres ELECTRE. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne.Google Scholar
  16. Nijkamp, P. (1975) `A Multicriteria Analysis for project Evaluation: Economic–Ecological Evaluation of a Land Reclamation Project’. Papers of the Regional Science Association, Volume 35, pp 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rogers, M.G. and Bruen, M.P. (1996) `Using ELECTRE to Rank Options within an Environmental Appraisal - Two Case Studies’. Civil Engineering Systems, Vol. 13, pp203221Google Scholar
  18. Rogers, M.G. and Bruen, M.P. (1997) `Applying ELECTRE To an Option Choice Problem Within an Environmental Appraisal - Three Case Studies from the Republic of Ireland’. Proceedings of the International Conference on Methods and Applications of Multicriteria Decision Making, May 14th to 16th, Mons, Belgium.Google Scholar
  19. Roy, B. (1968) `Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples (la methode ELECTRE)’. Revue Francaise d ‘Automatique Information et Recherche Operationelle (BIRO). Volume 8, pp 57–75.Google Scholar
  20. Roy, B. and Hugonnard, B. (1982) `Ranking of Suburban Line Extension Projects on the Paris Metro System by a Multi-criteria Method’ Transportation Research Record, Volume 16A, No. 4, pp 301–312.Google Scholar
  21. Roy, B. and McCord, M.R. (1996) Multicriteria Methodology for Decison Aiding,Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Saaty, T. (1977) ‘A Scaling for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures’. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Volume 15, pp 234–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saaty, T. (1988) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Research Allocation,McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Siskos, J., Hubert, P. (1988) `Multi-criteria Analysis of the Impacts of Energy Alternatives: A Survey and a New Approach’. European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 13, pp 278–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schwarz, R.M. (1994) The Skilled Facilitator, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  26. Van Delft, A., Nijkamp, P. (1977) Multi-criteria Analysis and Regional Decision Making. Martinus Nijhoff Social Services Division, Leiden.Google Scholar
  27. Vincke, P. (1992)Multi-criteria Decision Aid. John Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  28. Yoon, K.P., Hwang, C-L (1995) Multiple Attribute Decision Making. An Introduction, Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Rogers
  • Michael Bruen
  • Lucien-Yves Maystre

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations