Abstract
The proper planning of a major engineering system requires a set of procedures to be devised which ensures that available resources are allocated as efficiently as possible in its subsequent design and construction. This involves deciding how the available resources, including manpower, physical materials and finance can best be used to achieve the desired objectives of the project developer. Systems analysis can provide such a framework of procedures in which the fundamental issues of design and management can be addressed (de Neufville and Stafford, 1974). Engineering systems analysis provides an orderly process in which all factors relevant to the design and construction of major engineering projects can be considered. Use of the process has the following direct impacts on the coherent and logical development of such a project:
-
The process forces the developer to make explicit the objectives of the proposed system, together with how these objectives can be measured. This has the effect of heightening the developers awareness of his overall core objectives
-
It provides a framework in which alternative solutions will be readily generated as a means to selecting the most desired one
-
Appropriate methodologies for decision making will be proposed within the process for use in choosing between alternatives.
-
It will predict the major demands which will be placed on the facility under examination through the interaction of the various technical, environmental and social criteria generated by the process. These demands are not always detected in advance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bouyssou, D. (1990) `Building Criteria: A Prerequisite for MCDA’. In Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, pp58–80, ed. Bana e Costa, C., Springer-Verlag
Banville, C., Landry, M.,Martel, J.M., Boulaire, C. (1993) `A Stakeholder’s Approach to MCDA’, University Laval, CRAEDO, Working paper 93–77.
Beesley, M.E. and Foster, C.D. (1965) `Victoria Line: Social Benefits and Finances’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, pp67–88.
Belton, V. and Vickers, S. (1990) `Use of a Simple Multi-Attribute Value Function Incorporating Visual Interactive Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Criteria Decision Making’. In Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, pp319–334, ed. Bana e Costa, C., Springer-Verlag
Coburn, T.M., Beesley, M.E., Reynolds, D.J. (1960) The London - Birmingham Motorway.: Traffic and Economics, Road Research Laboratory, Technical Paper No. 46
de Neufville, R. and Stafford, J. (1974) Systems Analysis for Engineers and Managers,McGraw Hill
Dee, J. (1973) `Environmental Evaluation System for Water Resources Planning’ Water Resources Research, Volume 9, pp 523–535.
Flowerdew, A.D.J., (1972) `Choosing a Site for the Third London Airport: The Roskill Commission Approach’ In Cost BenefttAnalysis,R. Layard (ed), Penguin.
Goicoechea, A., Hansen, D.R., Duckstein, L. (1982) Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications John Wiley and Sons.
Guigou, J.L. (1971) `On French Location Models for Production Units’. Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 1, No. 2, pp 107–138.
Hill, M. (1973) Planning for Multiple Objectives: An Approach to the Evaluation of Transportation Plans. Technion.
Keeney, R. Raiffa, H. (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. John Wiley and Sons.
Lichfield, N. (1971) `Cost Benefit Analysis in Planning: A Critique of the Roskill Commission’ In Regional Studies, Volume 5, pp 157–183.
Lichfield, N., Kettle, P., Whitbread, M. (1975) Evaluation in the Planning Process. Oxford: Pergamon.
Maystre, L., Pictet, J., and Simos, J. (1994) Methodes Multicriteres ELECTRE. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne.
Nijkamp, P. (1975) `A Multicriteria Analysis for project Evaluation: Economic–Ecological Evaluation of a Land Reclamation Project’. Papers of the Regional Science Association, Volume 35, pp 87–111.
Rogers, M.G. and Bruen, M.P. (1996) `Using ELECTRE to Rank Options within an Environmental Appraisal - Two Case Studies’. Civil Engineering Systems, Vol. 13, pp203221
Rogers, M.G. and Bruen, M.P. (1997) `Applying ELECTRE To an Option Choice Problem Within an Environmental Appraisal - Three Case Studies from the Republic of Ireland’. Proceedings of the International Conference on Methods and Applications of Multicriteria Decision Making, May 14th to 16th, Mons, Belgium.
Roy, B. (1968) `Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples (la methode ELECTRE)’. Revue Francaise d ‘Automatique Information et Recherche Operationelle (BIRO). Volume 8, pp 57–75.
Roy, B. and Hugonnard, B. (1982) `Ranking of Suburban Line Extension Projects on the Paris Metro System by a Multi-criteria Method’ Transportation Research Record, Volume 16A, No. 4, pp 301–312.
Roy, B. and McCord, M.R. (1996) Multicriteria Methodology for Decison Aiding,Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Saaty, T. (1977) ‘A Scaling for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures’. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Volume 15, pp 234–281.
Saaty, T. (1988) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Research Allocation,McGraw Hill.
Siskos, J., Hubert, P. (1988) `Multi-criteria Analysis of the Impacts of Energy Alternatives: A Survey and a New Approach’. European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 13, pp 278–299.
Schwarz, R.M. (1994) The Skilled Facilitator, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
Van Delft, A., Nijkamp, P. (1977) Multi-criteria Analysis and Regional Decision Making. Martinus Nijhoff Social Services Division, Leiden.
Vincke, P. (1992)Multi-criteria Decision Aid. John Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom.
Yoon, K.P., Hwang, C-L (1995) Multiple Attribute Decision Making. An Introduction, Sage Publications.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rogers, M., Bruen, M., Maystre, LY. (2000). Introduction to Multicriteria Decision Methods. In: ELECTRE and Decision Support. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5057-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5057-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5108-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5057-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive