Skip to main content

Leontief Paradox

  • Chapter
  • 348 Accesses

Part of the book series: Research Monographs in Japan-U.S. Business & Economics ((JUSB,volume 6))

Abstract

There exist two possible methods for the investigation, the inductive inference and deductive inference. The inductive inference collects empirical observations and infers the general conclusion from them. Although it is very useful for the practical purposes, the inductive inference cannot arrive to the definite conclusion. You observe as many white swans as you like in the northern hemisphere, but cannot conclude that swan is white, since you cannot exclude the possibility to see black swans in the southern hemisphere. You can collect all the cases in the past, but cannot conclude definitely, since you cannot know the possible cases in the future. To arrive at the definite conclusion, therefore, we have to rely on the deductive inference. It starts with some assumptions and derive logical conclusions from them. Some assumptions may be derived from inductive inference founded on the empirical observations while other assumptions are made merely as the simplifying assumptions. As far as the assumptions are admitted, and the logical operations are correct, the derived conclusion must be accepted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Gandolfo, G., 1994, International Economics, I, Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. C., 1964, The Pure Theory of International Trade, Englewood Cliff, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W., 1954, Domestic Production and Foreign Trade; the American Capital Position Re-examined, Economia Internazionale, 7, pp. 3–32 (R. E. Caves and H. G. Johnson eds., Readings in International Economics, Homewood, Illinois; R. D. Irwin, 1968, pp. 503–527 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Minhas, B. S., 1962, The Homohypallagic Production Functions, Factor Intensity Reversals, and the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem, Journal of Political Economy, 70, pp. 140–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Negishi, T. (2001). Leontief Paradox. In: Developments of International Trade Theory. Research Monographs in Japan-U.S. Business & Economics, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4959-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4959-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4902-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4959-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics