Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Frontiers in Electronic Testing ((FRET,volume 10))

  • 254 Accesses

Abstract

Scan chains are a popular feature in complex ICs. The inherent test complexity of a scan chain is linear with respect to the number of flip-flops it contains. In this chapter, a DFT strategy is outlined such that a scan chain can be tested with very few test vectors by making the chain transparent in the test mode. Such a strategy improves the defect coverage of the IDDQ test for flip-flops. For ICs without scan chains, robust flip-flops are proposed that are inherently IDDQ testable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. Baker, A. Bratt, A. Richardson, and A. Welbers, “Development of a CLASS 1 QTAG Monitor,” Proceedings of International Test Conference, 1994, pp. 213–222.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Bhaysar, “A New Economical Implementation for Scannable Flip-Flops in MOS,” IEEE Design & Test, vol. 3, pp. 52–56, June 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P.S. Bottorhof, R.E. France, N.H. Garges, E.J. Orosz, “Test Generation for Large Logic Networks,” Proceedings of 14th Design Automation Conference, 1977, pp. 479–485.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. J. Chao, and C. A. Johnston, “Behavior Analysis of CMOS D Flip-flops,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1454–1458, October 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E.B. Eichelberger and T.W. Williams, “A Logic Design Structure for LSI Testability,” Journal of Design Automation and Fault Tolerant Computing, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 165–178, May 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F.J. Ferguson and J.P. Shen, “Extraction and Simulation of Realistic CMOS Faults using Inductive Fault Analysis,” Proceedings International Test Conference, 1988, pp. 475–484.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F.J. Ferguson and J.P. Shen, “A CMOS fault extractor for inductive fault analysis,” IEEE Transaction on Computer-Aided Design, vol. 7, pp. 1182–1194, November 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Funatsu, N. Wakatsuki and T. Arima, “Test Generation Systems in Japan,” Proceedings of 12th Design Automation Conference, 1975, pp. 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. U. Horstmann, H. W. Eichel and R. L. Coates, “Metastability Behavior of CMOS ASIC Flip-Flops in Theory and Test,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 146–157, February 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L.S. Kim, and R. W. Dutton, “Metastability of CMOS Latch/Flip-Flop,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 942–951, August 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. K.J. Lee and M.A. Breuer, “Design and Test Rules for CMOS Circuits to Facilitate IDDQ Testing of Bridging Faults,” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 659–669, May 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. W. Maly, and M. Patyra, “Design of ICs Applying Built-in Current Testing,” Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and applications, vol. 3, pp. 397–406, November 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M.R. Mercer, and V.D. Agrawal, “A Novel Clocking Technique for VLSI Circuits Testability,” IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 207–212, April 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Metra, M. Favalli, P. Olivo, and B. Ricco, “Testing of Resistive Bridging Faults in CMOS Flip-Flop,” Proceedings of European Test Conference, 1993, pp. 530–531.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Perry, “IDDQ testing in CMOS digital ASICs,” Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and applications, vol. 3, pp. 317–325, November 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Rodriguez-Montanes, J. Figueras and R. Rubio, “Current vs. Logic Testability of Bridges in Scan Chains,” Proceedings of European Test Conference, 1993, pp. 392–396.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Rodriguez-Montanes, E.M.J.G. Bruts and J. Figueras, “Bridging Defects Resistance Measurements in CMOS Process,” Proceeding of International Test Conference, 1992, pp. 892–899.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Rodriguez-Montanes and J. Figueras, “Analysis of Bridging Defects in Sequential CMOS Circuits and Their Current Testability,” Proceedings of European Design and Test conference, 1994. pp. 356–360.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Sachdev, “Transforming Sequential Logic for Voltage and IDDQ Testing,” Proceedings of European Design and Test Conference, 1994, pp. 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Sachdev, “Testting Defects in Scan Chains”, IEEE Design & Test of Computers, vol. 12, pp. 45–51, December 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Sachdev, “IDDQ and Voltage Testable CMOS Flip-flop Configurations,” Proceedings of International Test Conference, 1995, pp. 534–543.

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Singer, “1995: Looking Down the Road to Quarter-Micron Production,” Semiconductor International, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 46–52, January 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.M. Soden and C.F. Hawkins, “Test Considerations for Gate Oxide Shorts in CMOS ICs,” IEEE Design & Test of Computers, vol. 3, pp. 56–64, August 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J.M. Soden, C.F. Hawkins, R.K. Gulati and W. Mao, “IDDQ Testing: A Review,” Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and applications, vol. 3, pp. 291–303, November 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. T.M. Storey and W. Maly, “CMOS bridging faults detection,” Proceedings of International Test Conference, 1990, pp. 842–851.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M.E. Turner, et al., “Testing CMOS VLSI: Tools, Concepts, and Experimental Results”, Proceedings of International Test Conference, 1985, pp. 322–328.

    Google Scholar 

  27. H.J.M. Veendrick, “The Bahavior of Flip-Flops Used as Synchronizers and Prediction of Their Failure Rate,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 169–176, April 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. T.W. Williams and K.P. Parker, “Design for Testability—A Survey,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 98–113, January 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. B.W. Woodhall, B.D. Newman, and A.G. Sammuli, “Empirical Results of Undetected Stuck-open Failures,” Proceedings of International Test Conference, 1987, pp. 166–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sachdev, M. (1999). Testing Defects in Sequential Circuits. In: Defect Oriented Testing for CMOS Analog and Digital Circuits. Frontiers in Electronic Testing, vol 10. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4926-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4926-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4928-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4926-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics