Abstract
The purpose of probation is to protect public safety by deploying personnel to supervise individuals assigned to probation by the court. This paper presents a model for allocating probation officer resources that combines a statistical model for probationer risk classification and an integer, nonlinear multi-criteria programming resource allocation model for workload balancing. Data were obtained from the Florida Department of Corrections, which is implementing the model. The classification model identifies the expected likelihood of failure during discrete periods of supervision. These likelihoods are used to assign individuals to supervision levels. The proportion of probationers in each risk category is an input to the allocation model where decision variables are number of visits to probationers by type of visit and risk classification. Model constraints include performance characteristics, service time, public safety measures, and reduction in probationer failures. Officer contacts are allocated to minimize probationer failures and time and budget overruns.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baker, J.R., A.C. Saydam and P.K. Lattimore (1998) “A nonlinear multiple criteria model base for the problem of balancing caseload risk in probation departments,” Computers and Industrial Engineering: An International Journal.
Bonczar, T.P. and L.E. Glaze (1999) Probation and Parole in the United States, 1998, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
Geerken, M.R. and H.D. Hayes (1993) “Probation and parole: Public risk and the future of incarceration alternatives,” Criminology 31 (4): 549–564.
Lattimore, P.K. and R.L. Linster (1996) Statistical Basis for a Management Information System/Model-Based Risk Classification System for Probationers, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
Maguire, K. and A.L. Pastore, eds. (1996) Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 1995, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
Petersilia, J. (1993) “Measuring performance of community corrections” in Performance Measures for the Criminal Justice System, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., pages 61–84.
Turner, S., J. Petersilia and E.P. Deschenes (1992) “Evaluating intensive supervision probation/parole (ISP) for drug offenders,” Crime and Delinquency 38 (4): 539–556.
Zeleny, M. (1982) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, Auerbach, Philadelphia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baker, J.R., Saydam, A.C., Lattimore, P.K. (2000). An Interactive Workload and Risk Balancing Model and Decision Support System for Probationer Assignment. In: Zanakis, S.H., Doukidis, G., Zopounidis, C. (eds) Decision Making: Recent Developments and Worldwide Applications. Applied Optimization, vol 45. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4919-9_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4919-9_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4839-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4919-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive