Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: State and Challenges

  • Chapter
Cross-Cultural Risk Perception

Part of the book series: Technology, Risk, and Society ((RISKGOSO,volume 13))

Summary

The perception of risk within different cultures is a rather complex phenomenon that cannot be described on the basis of a single theory or model. The major accomplishment gained through psychological research was the discovery of qualitative risk characteristics and cognitive as well as affective factors that serve as heuristic tools for classifying and evaluating risk sources or activities. Sociological and cultural research has been essential in pointing out the social, political, and cultural factors that influence risk perception directly, as well as indirectly through the assignment of significance to the individual risk characteristics. The relative weights of the individual risk characteristics depend on social and cultural factors that form the main research agenda for cross-cultural research. The studies compiled in this volume include trust and credibility, social values, and group affiliations as predictors for risk responses. This last chapter provides a review of the findings of these studies and outlines the main lessons for understanding risk perception and designing effective programs for risk management and communication, as well as for improving future cross-cultural risk research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, F.W. (1987). Towards a holistic appreciation of risk: the challenge for communicators and policymakers Science, Technology, and Human Values, 12, 138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baughman, M. (1995). Mediation. In: O. Remi, T. Webler, & P. Wiedemann (Eds.), Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse. Dordrecht & Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, N. J., & Bell, R. W. (1993). Adolescent risk taking. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellrose, C., & Pilisuk, M. (1991). Vocational risk tolerance and perceptions of occupational hazards. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 303–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J.A. (1989). The policy implications of differing concepts of risk. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 14 (No.4), 380–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromiley, P., & Curley, S. P. (1992). Individual differences in risk taking. In J. F. Yates (Ed.), Risk taking behavior (pp. 87–133 ). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, W.J. & Clemen, R.T. (1993). Covariance structure models and influence diagrams. Management Science, 39, 816–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, L. (1989). Acceptable risk? Making choices in a toxic environment. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, C. (1993). The influence of mass media and interpersonal communication on societal and personal risk judgments. Communication Research, 20, 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, G., & Earle, T. C. (Eds.) (1991). Risk and culture. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, special volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlbaeck, O. (1996). Personality and risk taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1235–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1985). Risk acceptability according to the social sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. & Wildaysky, A. (1982). Risk and culture. Berkeley: University of California Press. Drottz-Sjöberg, B. (1991). Risk perceptions and definitions of risk. In B. Drottz-Sjöberg (Ed.), Perceptions of Risk (pp. 163–214 ). Stockholm: Center for Risk Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drottz-Sjöberg, B., & Sjöberg, L. (1991). Adolescents attitudes to nuclear power and radioactive wastes. In B. Drottz-Sjöberg (Ed.), Perception of Risk (pp. 109–135 ). Stockholm: Center for Risk Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. C., & Cvetkovich, G. T. (1995). Social trust: Toward a cosmopolitan society. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, F. (1991). The type-T personality. In L. P. Lipsitt & L. L. Mitnick (Eds.), Self-regulatory behavior and risk-taking: Causes and consequences (pp. 371–382 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwood/NJ: Ablex. Fiorino, D. J. (1989). Technical and democratic values in risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 9, 293–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1985). Managing risk perceptions. Issues in Science and Technology, 2, 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Quadrel, M. J. (1993). Risk perception and communication. Annual Review of Public Health, 14, 183–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W.R. (1992). Heuristics, biases, and the not-so-general publics: Expertise and error in the assessment of risks. In S. Krimsky and D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 229–250 ). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W.R. (1993). Risk and recreancy: Weber, the division of labor, and the rationality of risk perceptions. Social Forces, 71, 909–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. K. (1994). Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 14, 1101–1108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Gould, L.C.; Gardner, G.Y.; DeLuca, D.R.; Tieman, A.; Doob, L.W. & Stolwijk, J.A.J. (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perceptions of technological risk and benefits. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Greening, L., & Dollinger, S. J. (1992). Adolescent’s perceptions of lightning and tornado risks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 755–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. (1971). Toward a rational society. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampel, J. & Pfenning, U. (1998). Biotechnology and public perception of technology. The German case. Working Report of the Center of Technology Assessment in Baden-Württemberg. Stuttgart: TA-Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, P., & Zuckerman, M. (1992). Sensation seeking, risk appraisal and behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (1998). The political science of risk perception. Reliability Engineering & Systems Safety, 59 (1), 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47 (No. 2), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E. (1996). Are proenvironmental commitments motivated by health concerns or by perceived justice? In: L. Montada & M. Lerner (Eds.), Current societal concerns about justice (pp. 231–258 ). New York: Plenum

    Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E., Schumacher, D. & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as motivational basis to protect nature. Environment & Behavior, 31 (2), 178–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson R., Golding, D. & Tuler, S. (1992). Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 161–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E. & Kasperson, J.X. (1983). Determining the acceptability of risk: Ethical and policy issues. In J.T. Rogers & D.V. Bates (Eds.), Assessment and perception of risk to human health (pp. 135–155 ). Conference Proceedings. Ottawa: Royal Society of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E, Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H.S., Emel, J., Goble. R., Kasperson, J.X. & Ratick, S. (1988), The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8, 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keinan, G., Meir, E., & Gome-Nemirovsky, T. (1984). Measurement of risk takers’ personality. Psychological Reports, 55, 163–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky, S. (1992). The role of theory in risk studies. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 3–22 ). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H. & Slovic, R (1996). Science, values, and risk Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Special Issue, H. Kunreuther & P. Slovic (Eds.), Challenges in risk assessment and risk management (pp. 116–125 ). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantermann, E,-D., Döring-Seipel, E. & Schirma, R (1992). Werte, Gefühle and Unbestimmtheit: Kognitivemotionale Wechselwirkungen im Umgang mit einem ökologischen System. In: K. Pawlik & K.H. Stapf (Eds.), Umwelt and Verhalten. Perspektiven and Ergebnisse ökopsychologischer Forschung (pp. 129–144 ). Bern: Huber

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappe, H. (1991). Perceptions of drug risk: individual and public responses to drugs. Ph.Diss., Berlin: Technical University of Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, J., & MacLean, D. (1988). The role of media in risk communication. In H. Jungermann, R. E. Kasperson, & P. M. Wiedemann (Eds.), Risk communication (pp. 3349). Proceedings of the international workshop on risk communication. Juelich: Research Center - MUT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnerooth-Bayer, J. & Fitzgerald, K.B. (1996). Conflicting views on fair siting processes: Evidence from Austria and the U.S. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment, 7 (2), 119–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, L. L. (1988). Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 255–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, L. L. (1993). On modeling risky choice: Why reasons matter. In O. Huber, J. Mumpower, J. V. Plight, & P. Koele (Eds.), Current themes in psychological decision research Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N. (1990). Technology, environment, and social risk: a systems perspective. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 4, 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, C., Langford, I., & O’Riordan, T. (1996). Integrating sociological and psychological approaches to public perceptions on environmental risks. Research Report. Norwich: University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, D. (1986). Social values and the distribution of risk. In D. MacLean (Ed.), Values at risk (pp. 75–93 ). Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, H.P. (1986). Public opinion as a channel of communication between science and other parts of society. Manuscript for the 11. World Congress of Sociology, August 18–22, 1986. New Delhi: Research Center Juelich- MUT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, H.P. (1994): Risikokommunikation in den Medien. In: K. Merten; S.J. Schmidt & S. Weichenberger (Eds.), Die Wirklichkeit der Medien. Eine Einführung in die Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 329–351 ). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, S. (1984). Disagreeing about risk: The institutional cultures of risk management and planning for future generations. In S.G. Hadden (Ed.), Risk analysis, institutions, and public policy (pp. 150–17 ). Port Washington: Associated Faculty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, S. (1987). Risk and relativism in science for policy. In V. T. Covello and B.B. Johnson (Eds.), The social and cultural construction of risk (pp. 5–23 ).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dordrecht: Reidel. Rayner, S. (1990). Risk in cultural perspective: Acting under uncertainty. Norwell: Klewer. Rayner, S. & Cantor, R. (1987). How fair is safe enough? The cultural approach to societal technology choice. Risk Analysis, 7, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. (1990). Risk perception and risk management: A review. Risk Abstracts, 7 (No. 1), 19 (Part 1) and 7 (No. 2 ), 1–9 (Part 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. (1992a). Risk communication: towards a rational discourse with the public. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 29, 465–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn O (1992b). The social arena concept of risk debates. In S. Krimsky and D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 170–197 ). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn O (1995). Style of using scientific expertise: a comparative framework. Science and Public Policy, 22, 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, 0., Burns, W. J., Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., & Slovic, P. (1992). The social amplification of risk: Theoretical foundations and empirical applications. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, 0., Webler, Th., Rakel, H., Dienel, P. C., & Johnson, B. B. (1993). Public participation in the decision making: a three-step procedure. Policy Sciences, 26, 189–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reran, O. & Zwick, M.M. (1997): Risiko-and Technikakzeptanz. Berlin et. al.: Springer. Rohrmann, B. (1991). Akteure der Risiko-Kommunikation. In H. Jungermann, B. Rohrmann, & P. M. Wiedemann (Eds.), Risikokontroversen–Konzepte, Konflikte, Kommunikation (pp. 355–371 ). Berlin et. al.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B. (1998). The risk notion - epistemological and empirical considerations. In R. Melchers (Ed.), Integrative risk assessment I I. Rotterdam: Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B. (1999). Risk perception research: Review and documentation (Update, Studies in Risk Communication vol. 69). Juelich: Research Center. (Available on the WWW,• URL = http://www.kfa-juelich.de/mut/hefte/heft_69.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B. & Loquet, T. (in prep). Attitudes toward risk taking and risk perception: Findings from five studies (Research report). Melbourne: University of Melbourne, Dept. of Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, I. (1993). Demographic influences on risk perceptions. Risk Analysis, 13, 413–420. Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Determinants of risk-taking: behavioral and economic views. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuetz, H. (in prep.). Die Struktur von Risikowahrnehmung - Anwendung von Strukturgleichungsmodellen. Juelich: Research Center Juelich - MUT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, M. & Thompson, M. (1990). Divided we stand: Redefining politics, technology, and social choice. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J.F. (1984). The social fabric of risk: Toward the social transformation of risk analysis. American Sociological Review, 49, 711–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J.F. (1989). On defining, describing, and explaining elephants (and reactions to them): Hazards, disasters, and risk analysis. Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 7 (No.3), 397–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J.F & Clarke, L. (1992). Social organization and risk. In J.F. Short & L. Clarke (Eds.), Organizations, uncertainties, and risk (pp. 309–321 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M. (1991). Risk, society, politicians, scientists, and people. In M. Shubik (Ed.), Risk, organizations, and society (pp. 7–30 ) Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. (1995). Determinants of risky decision-making Behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1573–1592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (1997). Explaining risk perception: An empirical evaluation of cultural theory. Risk Decision and Policy, 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1985). Characterizing perceived risk. In R. W. Kates, C. Hohenemser, & J. X. Kasperson (Eds.), Perilous progress: managing the hazards of technology (pp. 91–125 ). Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (1992). Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In D. Golding & S. Krimsky (Eds.), Theories of risk (pp. 117–152 ). London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Layman, M., & Flynn, J. (1991). Risk perception, trust, and nuclear waste: Lessons from Yucca Mountain. Environment, 33, 6–11, 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, M. (1991). The changing nature of ignorance. In J. Handmer, B. Dutton, B. Guerin, & M. Smithson (Eds.), New perspectives on uncertainty and risk (pp. 5–38 ). Canberra: ANU/ CRES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L. (1998). Myths of nature and risk perception: A psychological contribution to cultural theory. Paper presented at the ICAP 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimpop, R. M. (1994). The psychology of risk taking behavior. Amsterdam: New Holland. Urban, D. (1998): Technikeinstellungen: gibt es die überhaupt? Eine Längsschnittanalyse von

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewertungen der Gentechnik. Working Report of the Institute for Social Sciences, No.2. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, E., & Nordenstam, B. (1991). Perceptions of environmental risk among ethnically diverse groups in the United States. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 22, 29–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. (1999 in press). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science Weinstein, N. (1988). The precaution adoption process. Health Psychology, 355–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, G. J. S. (1988). Risk homeostasis theory. Ergonomics, 31, 491–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, L. (1991). The risks outside and the pictures in our heads: Connecting the news to people and politics. In J. Handmer, B. Dutton, B. Guerin, & M. Smithson (Eds.), New perspectives on uncertainty and risk (pp. 133–160 ). Canberra: ANU/ CRES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1990). The psychology of sensation seeking. Journal of Personality, 58, 313345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, M.M. & Renn, O. (1998). Wahrnehmung und Bewertung von Technik in Baden-Württemberg. Report Center of Technology Assessment in Baden-Württemberg. Stuttgart: Center of TA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Technology Assessment, Stuttgart, Germany

    Ortwin Renn

  2. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Bernd Rohrmann

Authors
  1. Ortwin Renn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernd Rohrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Technology Assessment, Stuttgart, Germany

    Ortwin Renn

  2. University of Melbourne, Australia

    Bernd Rohrmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Renn, O., Rohrmann, B. (2000). Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: State and Challenges. In: Renn, O., Rohrmann, B. (eds) Cross-Cultural Risk Perception. Technology, Risk, and Society, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4891-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4891-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4961-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4891-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation