We Do Not Deserve to Kill

  • Marvin Wolfgang


The major purposes of punishment historically have been retribution, expiation, deterrence, reformation, and social defense. Throughout history, an eye for an eye, the payment of one’s debt to society by expiation, general deterrence of crime by exemplary punishment and specific or special deterrence of an individual offender, reformation of the individual so that he or she will not commit further crime, and protection of society against criminality by detaining or imprisoning offenders have been the principal rationales for the disposition of criminal offenders.


Death Penalty Criminal Justice System Corporal Punishment Social Protection Social Defense 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beccaria, Cesare. (1963). On Crimes and Punishments. Trans. Henry Paolucci. NY: Botts-Merrill. (Original publication, Dei delitti a della pena, in 1764 )Google Scholar
  2. Blumstein, Alfred, et al. (1978). Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates. Washington, DC: Panel on Research on Deterrent and Incapacitation Effects, National Academy of Science, Deterrence and Incapacitation.Google Scholar
  3. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. (1953). Royal Commission on Capital Punishment, 1949–1953 Report. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  4. Hutchins, Robert Maynard. ( 1952. 9) Great Books of the Western World. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.Google Scholar
  5. Kaufman, Walter. (1975). Without Guilt and Justice NY: Dell. Padover, Saul K., ed. (1943). The Complete Jefferson Google Scholar
  6. Prejean, H. (1993). Dead Man Walking: An Eyewitness Account of the Death Penalty in the United States Google Scholar
  7. Pritchard, James B. (1955). Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament. 2d ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Pritchard, James B. (1977). “Retribution and the Ethics of Punishment.” In Assessing the Criminal: Restitution, Retribution, and the Legal Process, edited by Randy E. Barnett and John Hagel I II.Google Scholar
  9. Sellin, Thorsten. (1977). “Beccaria’s Substitute for the Death Penalty.” In Criminology in Perspective, edited by Simha F. Landau and Leslie Sebba.Google Scholar
  10. Tennessee v. Garner. (1985). 471 U.S. 1.Google Scholar
  11. Wolfgang, Marvin E. (1960). “A Florentine Prison: Le Carceri delle Stinche.” Studies in the Renaissance, 148–66. NY: Renaissance Society of America.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marvin Wolfgang

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations