Considerations in Systems Development of Applications for Mobile Devices

A case study
  • Linda Dawson
  • Julie Fisher
Conference paper

Abstract

Mobile devices differ from PCs because of their size, input device limitations, the mobility provided to users and their potential to be context aware. Because of usability, and implementation issues designing applications for mobile devices may require a different approach to systems development from that used for system development for PC applications. This study explores these issues by examining usability, implementation in the development of an application for a hand held device, a Palm Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), in a health care environment.

Keywords

Mobile Device System Development Mobile Application Implementation Issue Project Leader 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abowd, G., and Mynatt, E., 2000, Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing, ATM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albers, M. J., and Kim, L., 2000, User Web browsing characteristics using palm handhelds for information retrieval, Proceedings of IPCC/SIGDOC 2000 Technology and Teamwork, Cambridge, MA, pp. 125–135.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J., 1997, Clearing the way for physicians’ use of clinical information systems, Communications of the ACM, 40, 8: 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreou, A., Chrysostomou, C., Leonidou, C.,Mavromoustakos, S., Pitsillides, A., Samaras, G., and Schizas, C., 2002, Mobile commerce applications and services: a design and development approach, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mobile Business, AthensGoogle Scholar
  5. Avison, D. E., and Fitzgerald, G., 1995, Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools,(2 ed.), McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
  6. Bansler, J., and Bodker, K., 1993, A reappraisal of structured analysis: design in an organizational context, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11, 2: 165–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellotti, V., Back, M., Edwards, K., Griner, R., Henderson, A., and Lopes, C., 2002, Making sense of sensing systems: five questions for designers and researchers, Proceedings of the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Minnesota, USA, 415–422.Google Scholar
  8. Bent, P., Bolsin, S., Creati, B., Patrick, A., and Colson, M., 2002, Professional monitoring and critical incident reporting using personal digital assistants, Medical Journal of Australia, 177: 496–499.Google Scholar
  9. Bevan, N., 2001, Intemational standards for HCI and usability, International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 55: 533–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan, S., Fang, X., Brzezinski, J., Zhou, Y., Xu, S., and Lam, J., 2002, Usability for mobile commerce across multiple form factors, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 3, 3: 187–199.Google Scholar
  11. Chatzoglou, P. D., and Macaulay, L. A., 1996, Requirements capture and IS methodologies, Information Systems Journal, 6, 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawson, L., and Darke, P., 2002 ), The adoption and adaptation of object-oriented methodologies in requirements engineering practice, Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Information Systems, Gdansk, Poland, 406–415.Google Scholar
  13. Dix, A., Rodden, T., Davies, N., Trevor, J., Friday, A., and Palfreyman, K., 2000, Exploiting space and location as the design framework for interactive mobile systems, Communications of the ACM, 7, 3: 285–321.Google Scholar
  14. Fitzgerald, B., 1997, The use of systems development methodologies in practice: a field study, Information Systems Journal, 7: 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitzgerald, B., 1998a, An empirical investigation into the adoption of system development methodologies, Information and Management, 34: 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitzgerald, B., 1998b, An empirically-grounded framework for the information systems development Process, Proceedings of the Nineteenth Intemational Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland, 103–114.Google Scholar
  17. Huang, A. C., Ling, B. C., Barton, J., and Fox, A., 2001, Making computers disappear: appliance data services, ACM SIGMOBILE, 7: 108–121.Google Scholar
  18. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., and Rumbaugh, J., 1999, The Unified Software Development Process, Addison Wesley Longman, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  19. Koop, A., and Mosges, R., 2002, The use of handheld computers in clinical trials, Controlled Clinical Trials, 23, 4: 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loucopoulos, P., and Karakostas, V., 1995, Systems Requirements Engineering, McGraw-Hill, London, UK.Google Scholar
  21. Luff, P., and Heath, C., 1998, Mobility in collaboration, Proceedings of the CSCW ‘88, Seattle, Washington, 305–314.Google Scholar
  22. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M., 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, ( 2nd ed. ), Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  23. Myers, M., 1999, Qualitative Research in Information Systems; http://www.auckland.ac.nz/msis/isworld/. Norman, D. A., 1988, The Psychology of Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Page, E. S., 1954, Continuous Inspection Schemes, Biometrika, 41.Google Scholar
  25. Pierre, S., 2001, Mobile computing and ubiquitous networking: concepts, technologies and challenges, Telematics and Informatics, 18, 109–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., and Lorensen, W., 1991, Object-Oriented Modeling and Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  27. Shewhart, W. A., 1931, Economic Control of Quality Manufactured Product, Nostrand-Reinhold, New York. Shipman, J. and Morton, A., 2001, The new black bag: PDAs, health care and library services. Reference Services Review 29 (3): 229–238.Google Scholar
  28. Shneiderman, B., 1998, Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human Computer Interaction,Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  29. Shneiderman, B., 2000, Universal usability, Communications of the ACM 43 (5): 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shneiderman, B., 2.001, CUU: bridging the digital divide with universal usability. Interactions_(March—April): 11–15.Google Scholar
  31. Siau, K., Lim, P., and Shen, Z., 2001, Mobile commerce: promises, challenges and research agenda, Journal of Database Management, 12, 3: 4–13.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, H., and Kulatilaka, N., 2002, Developments in IS practice III: riding the wave: extracting value from mobile technology, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 8: 467–481.Google Scholar
  33. Sommerville, I., and Sawyer, P., 1997, Requirements ngineering: A good practice guide, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  34. Urquhart, C., 1998, Analysts and clients in conversation: cases in early requirements gathering, Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland, 115–127.Google Scholar
  35. Wynekoop, J. L., and Russo, N. L., 1997, Studying system development methodologies: an examination of research methods, Information Systems Journal, 7: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda Dawson
    • 1
  • Julie Fisher
    • 1
  1. 1.the School of Information Management and SystemsMonash UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations