Modelling Emergent Processes in Knowledge-Intensive Environments

  • I. T. Hawryszkiewycz
Conference paper


A business process is traditionally made up of a number of tasks carried out by people, who must coordinate their activities to ensure that the process reaches a satisfactory conclusion. Processes can be characterized in the way shown in Figure 1. At one end of the spectrum are predefined processes, where the work in each individual task can be clearly defined and, usually, each task is carried out by one or more specified persons. Predefined processes are currently supported by workflow management systems. Although such predefined processes can support the more traditional organizational functions such as inventory control or financial transactions, they cannot predefine the more emergent processes that take place in knowledge intensive environments such as innovation or the design of specialized products and services.


Extension Emergence Process Instance Rich Picture Global Emergence Emergent Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Dourish, P., 1998, Using Metalevel Techniques in a Flexible Toolkit for CSCW Applications, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 8, No. 2, June 1998, 109–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Grant, R. M., 1996, Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration, Organization Science, Vol. 7, No. 4, July, 1996, 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Greiner, C., Hawryszkiewycz, I., Rose, T. and Fliender, T. M., 1996, Supporting Health Research Strategy Planning Processes of WHO with Information Technology, Proc. GI-Workshop on Telecooperation Systems in Decentralized Organizations, Berlin.Google Scholar
  4. Hattori, F., Ohguro, T., Yokoo, M., Matsubara, S. and Yoshida, S., 1999, Socialware: Multiagent Systems for Supporting Network Communities, Communications of the ACM, March, 1999, 55–59.Google Scholar
  5. Hawryszkiewycz, I. T., 1997, Designing the Networked Enterprise,Artech House.Google Scholar
  6. Heinl, P., Horn, S., Jablonski, S., Neeb, J., Stein, K. and Teschke, M., 2001, A Comprehensive Approach to Flexibility in Workflow Management System, WACC’99, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  7. Hoffman, M., Loser, K-U, Walter, T. and Herrmann, T., 1999, A Design Process for Embedding Knowledge Management in Everyday Work, Group 99, Phoenix, Arizona, 296–305.Google Scholar
  8. Jones, C. T., Hesterly, W. S., and S. P. Borgatti, 1997, A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 4, October, 1997, 911–945.Google Scholar
  9. Jorgensen, H. D., 2001, Interaction as a Framework for Flexible Workflow Modelling, Proceedings of the Group2001 Conference, Sept.30—Oct. 3, Bioulder, Colorado, 32–41.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. T. Hawryszkiewycz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations