Skip to main content

A Quality Model for the Evaluation of Software Requirements Specifications

  • Conference paper
  • 267 Accesses

Abstract

A number of models for software product quality have been defined in the literature. Hierarchical models (for example McCall et al., 1977; Boehm et al., 1978) Quantitative models (for example Gilb, 1985, 1987) and Product/process-based models (for example Kitchenham, 1987). However, criticisms have been aimed at the product quality models in terms of the difficulties involved in their practical application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Basili, V. R. and Musa, J. D., 1991, The future engineering of software: A management perspective, Computer, September 1991, 90–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, B. W., Brown, J. R., Kaspar, H., Lipow, M., MacLead, G. J. and Menit, M. J., 1978, Characteristics of software quality, Volume 1 of TRW Series of Software Technology North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, B., Krasner, H. and Iscoe, N., 1988, A Field of Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems, Communications of the ACM, 31 (11), 1268–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dromey, R. G., 2003, Software Quality-Prevention versus Cure?, Softare Quality Journal, 11, 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dromey, R. G., 1995, “A Model for Software Product Quality”, IEEE SoftwareEngineering, Vol 21, No 1, 118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dromey, R. G., 1996, Cornering the Chimera, 1996, IEEE Software, Vol 13, No. 1, Jan. 1996, 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilb, T., 1985, Tools for design by objectives, in: Software requirements specification and testing, Anderson, T., ed., Blackwell Scientific, UK, pp. 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilb, T., 1987, Principles of Software Engineering Management, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mas. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC TR 15504–5, 1998, Information Technology - Software process assessment - Part 5:An assessment

    Google Scholar 

  • model and indicator guidance, Technical Report type 2, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC 14598–1–6, 1999, Information technology – Software product evaluation, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC 9126, 1991, Information Technology - Software Product Evaluation - Quality Characteristics and Guidelines for Their Use, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchenham, B., 1987, Towards a constructive quality model, Part 1: Software quality modelling, measurement and prediction, Software Engineering Journal, Vol 2, No 4, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchenham, B. and Pfleeger, S. L., 1996, Software Quality: The Elusive Target, IEEE Software, January, Vol 13, No 1, 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubas, M., Potts, C. and Richter, C., 1993, A Review of the State of the Practice in Requirement Modelling, IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, San Diego, CA, USA, IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, J. A., Richards, P. K. and Walters, G. F., 1977, Factors in Software Quality, Vol. 1, 2, 3, AD/A-049014/015/055, National Tech. Information Service, Springfield, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuseibeh, B. and Easterbrook, S., 2000, Requirements Engineering: A Roadmap, in: The Future of Software Engineereing 2000, 22 nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Finkelstein, A., ed., ACM, pp. 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, I. and Sawyer, S., 19971, Requirements Engineering: A Good Practice Guide,John Wiley and Sons, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W.M., Rosenberg, L. H. and Hyatt, L. E., 1996, Automated Quality Analysis of Natural Language Requirements Specifications ARM Tool, in Proceedings of 14th Annual Pacific Conference NW SW QC. October 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gasston, J.L. (2004). A Quality Model for the Evaluation of Software Requirements Specifications. In: Linger, H., et al. Constructing the Infrastructure for the Knowledge Economy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4852-9_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4852-9_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3459-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4852-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics