On Business Rules Approach to the Information Systems Development

  • Irma Valatkaite
  • Olegas Vasilecas
Conference paper


Business rules approach to information systems (IS) development emerged as the response to the growing need of business organizations to manage their knowledge explicitly and map it effectively to business IS in order to support daily business operations.


Modeling Language Infonnation System Business Rule Conceptual Graph Active Database 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    ACT-NET Consortium: The Active Database Management Systems Manifesto: A Rulebase of ADBMS Features, ACM Sigmod Record, Vol. 25 (30), 40–49 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Bajec, R. Rupnik, and M. Crisper, Using Business Rules Technologies To Bridge The Gap Between Business And Business Applications, in: Proceedings of the IFIP 16th World Computer Congress 2000, Information Technology for Business Management ( G Rechnu, Ed), Beijing, China, 2000, pp. 77–85Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Business Rules Group. Defining Business Rules — What Are They Really? (formerly known as the “GUIDE Business Rules Project Final Report,” November 1995), Business Rules Group, (3rd Ed.), July 2000. (Available at Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Chein, M. L. Mugnier, Conceptual Graphs: Fundamental Notions. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle, Vol. 6, No. 4, 365–406 (1992).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. J. Date, What Not How: The Business Rules Approach to Application development,(Reading. Mass.: Addison-Wesley Longman).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Gottesdiener, Top Ten Ways Project Teams Misuse Use Cases — and How to Correct Them, Part I: Content and Style Issues, The Rational Edge, June 2002, URL: contentljun_02/ t_misuseUseCases_eg.jsp.
  7. 7.
    E. Gottesdiener, Business RULES Show Power, Promise, Application Development Trends, Volume 4, Number 31, March 1997: see:
  8. 8.
    I. Graham, Requirements Engineering and Rapid Development, (Addison-Wesley, 1998 ).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Lin, Alternatives For Rule-based Application Development, Business Rules Journal,Vol. 3, No. 10 (October 2002), URL:
  10. 10.
    T. Morgan, Business Rules and Information Systems: Aligning IT with Business Goals, (Addison-Wesley, 2002 ).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Object Management Group. Business Rules in Models: Request for Information. URL:–bin/doc?ad/2002–9–13 (2002)
  12. 12.
    J. Odell, Business Rules, Object Magazine, February, 1995 republished in: Wisdom of the Gurus: A Vision for Object Technology, Charles Bowman, ed., (SIGS Books, 1996) and in: Advanced Object-Oriented Analysis and Design using UML, (SIGS Books, 1998 ).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. G. Ross, The Business Rules Classification Scheme, DataToKnowledge Newsletter,Volume 29, Number 5, (2001). See:
  14. 14.
    R. G. Ross, and G.S.W. Lam, RuleSpeakTMSentence Templates: Developing Rule Statements Using Sentence Patterns, Business Rule Solutions, (2001). Downloadable via:
  15. 15.
    R. G. Ross, The Business Rule Book: Classifying, Defining and Modeling Rules, 2nd edition, (Database Research Group, Boston, MA, 1997).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Sobieski, S. Krovvidy, C. McClintock, and M. Thorpe, KARMA: Managing Business rules from Specification to Implementation, paper presented at American Association of Artificial Intelligence Conference, Innovative Applications of AI track, Portland, Or, 7/96. Business Rule Summit, February 2628, 1996, Miller Freeman Inc., 600 Harrison Street, San Francisco, CA 94107Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. F. Sowa, Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations, (Brooks/Cole, Pasific Grove et al., 2000).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    L Valatkaite and O. Vasilecas, Deriving active database triggers from business rules model with conceptual graphs, Lithuanian Mathematical Journal, Vilnius, MII, t. 42, special issue “Proceedings of the XLIII conference of Lithuanian Mathematical Society”, 289–293, ( 2002, in Lithuanian).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    I. Valatkaite and O. Vasilecas, Application Domain Knowledge Modeling Using Conceptual Graphs, in: Information Systems Development: Advances in Methodologies, Components and Management. Kirikova, M. ed. (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2002 ), pp. 193–202.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    I. Valatkaite and O. Vasilecas, A Conceptual Graphs Approach for Business Rules Modeling. Accepted by Seventh East-European Conference on Advance in Databases and Information Systems (ADBIS), September 3–6, 2003, Dresden, Germany. To be published in Lecture Notes of Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. Von Halle, Business Rules Applied: Building Better Systems Using the Business Rules Approach, (John Wiley and Sons, 2002).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. Von Halle, The business rule roadmap, Database Programming and Design, 10(10), 13–15, (1997).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. A. Zachman, A Framework for Information Systems Architecture, IBM Systems Journal, vol. 26, no. 3, IBM Publication G321–5298 (1987).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irma Valatkaite
  • Olegas Vasilecas
    • 1
  1. 1.Information Systems LaboratoryVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations