Productivity and Cost Measurement for the United States Postal Service: Variations Among Regions

  • J. R. Norsworthy
  • Show-Ling Jang
  • Wei-Ming Shi
  • Thomas A. Abbott
  • Donald J. O’Hara
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series book series (TREP, volume 8)

Abstract

This paper extends the application of cost function-based analysis of productivity to the complex service sector, where it is generally believed that the influence of worker attitudes on productivity is greater than in manufacturing sectors. Also introduced is an explicit model of worker attitude formation, based on measures of workload, supervision, and the organization of production. The data base for the study is a cross-section of 200 Management Sectional Centers for the United States Postal Service (LISPS) for 1984. These Management Sectional Centers (MSCs) have responsibility for mail collection, forwarding, and delivering for geographic regions that completely cover all 50 states. The resulting cost model is used to estimate productivity at these 200 MSCs, as well as the cost of serving the particular geographic areas, characterized in terms of the number of delivery points, population, and areas served in square miles.

Keywords

Marginal Cost Total Factor Productivity Input Price Network Cost Capital Input 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baxter, Vern 1987. `Technological Change and Labor Relations in the United States Postal Service.“ In Workers, Managers and Technical Change: Emerging Patterns of Labor Relations, Plenum: 91–110, edited by Daniel B. Cornfeld.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, R.S., and L.R. Christensen. 1981. “Estimating Elasticities of Substitution in a Model of Partial Static Equilibrium: An Application to United States Agriculture 1947 to 1974.” In Measuring and Modeling Natural Resources Substitution: 208–229, edited by E.R. Berndt and B.C. Field. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Christensen, D.C., L.R. Christensen, R. Degan, and P. Schoech. 1980. “Capital Formation in the United States Postal Service.” In Technology and Capital Formation, edited by D.W. Jorgensen and R. Landan. Cambrige, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Christensen, L.R., D. Cummings, and P.E. Schoech. 1983. “Econometric Estimation of Scale Economics in Telecommunications,” In Telecommunications in Canada, edited by L. Courville, A. DeFontenay, and R. Dobell.Google Scholar
  5. L.R. Christensen Associates, Inc. 1984. United States Postal Service, Real Output, Input and Total Factor Productivity, 1963–1982. Google Scholar
  6. Cowing, T.G., and R.E. Stevenson. (eds.) 1981. Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Denny, M., M. Fuss, and L. Waverman. 1981. “The Measurement and Interpretation of Total Factor Productivity in Regulated Industries, with an Application to Canadian Telecommunication.” In Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries edited by T.G. Cowing and R.E. Stevenson, pages 179–217. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gollop, F.M., and M.J. Roberts. 1981. `The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States Electric Power Industry.“ In Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries, edited by T.G. Cowing and R. E. Stevenson, pages 107–163.Google Scholar
  9. Hulten, C.R., and F.C. Wykoff. 1981. `The Measurement of Economic Depreciation.“ In Depreciation, Inflation and the Taxation of Income Capital, edited by Hulten, C.R., and F.C. Wykoff, pages 81–132. The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Klotz, B.P. 1970. Productivity Measurement in Manufacturing Plants,Staff Paper #50, Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
  11. Lam, Alice, J.R. Norsworthy, and C. Zabala. (forthcoming). In Productivity in Japan and the United States,edited by C.R. Hulten. National Bureau of Economic Research volume. McElroy, Marjorie B. 1987. “Additive General Error Models for Production, Cost, andGoogle Scholar
  12. Derived Demand or Shared System.“Journal of Political Economy 95(4): 737–757. Norsworthy, J.R., and C.A. Zabala. 1985a. ”Effects of Worker Attitudes on Production Costs and Value of Capital Input.“ The Economic Journal 95:992–1002.Google Scholar
  13. Norsworthy, J.R., and C.A. Zabala. 1985b. “Worker Behavior and Productivity in the U.S. Automobile Industry, 1959–1976.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38: 544–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Norsworthy, J.R., and Show-Ling Jang. 1988. “Quantity-Based Measurement of Technological Change in Economic Models.” Working paper, Center for Science and Technology Policy, School of Management, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI).Google Scholar
  15. Norsworthy, J.R., Show-Ling Jang, and D.S. Rebne. 1989. “Worker Attitudes, Supervision and Productivity in Service Industries: A Study of the United States Postal Service.” Technical Report No. 01–89, Center for Science and Technology Policy, RPI.Google Scholar
  16. Rebne, D.S., and J.R. Norsworthy. 1989. “A Sociotechnical Model of Production Systems and Worker Attitude Formation.” Working paper, School of Management, RPI.Google Scholar
  17. Tiemey, John T. 1988. The United States Postal Service: Status and Prospects of a Public Enterprise. Auburn House.Google Scholar
  18. Laurits R. Christensen Associates, Inc. 1990. “United States Postal Service Annual Total Factor Productivity.” Available from the Office of Economic Analysis, U.S. Postal Service (March). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. Norsworthy
  • Show-Ling Jang
  • Wei-Ming Shi
  • Thomas A. Abbott
  • Donald J. O’Hara

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations