Skip to main content

Delivering Letters: Should it be Decriminalized?

  • Chapter
Competition and Innovation in Postal Services

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series ((TREP,volume 8))

Abstract

Throughout the world it is illegal to compete with the state Post Office in the collection and delivery of letters.1 Is this an instance of the madness of crowds (of bureaucrats) or is there a good economic or other justification for outlawing competition? As background to discussing the substantive issues, we first provide a brief historical account of the evolution of the monopoly in Britain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Coase, R.H. 1939. “Rowland Hill and the Penny Post.” Economica 6 (November): 423–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1961. “The British Post Office and the Messenger Companies.”Journal of Law and Economics 4:12–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daunton, M.J. 1985. Royal Mail. London: Athlone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., and D. de Meza. 1988. “Should the Post Office’s Statutory Monopoly be Lifted?” London School of Economics mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1962. Capital and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L.C., and E.L. Lynk. 1990. “An Empirical Examination of the Case for Post Office Divestiture in the UK.” Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N.G., and M. Whinston 1986. “Free Entry and Social Efficiency.” Rand Journal 17 (Spring): 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzar, J.C., and R.D. Willig. “Free Entry and the Sustainability of Natural Monopoly.”Bell Journal 8 (Spring): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryke, R. 1981. The Nationalised Industries. Oxford: Mart in Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. 1986. `The Nature and Scope of Contestability Theory.“ Oxford Economic Papers 38 (supplement): 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabor, R. 1987a. “Can Competition Pass `Go’ with a Natural Monopoly?” Public Finance and Accountancy (May 8 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabor, R. 1987b. “Who Benefits from `One Price for Everyone’?” Public Finance and Accountancy (June 12 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Estrin, S., de Meza, D., Rowley, C.K. (1991). Delivering Letters: Should it be Decriminalized?. In: Crew, M.A., Kleindorfer, P.R. (eds) Competition and Innovation in Postal Services. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4818-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4818-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5127-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4818-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics