Abstract
The United Kingdom Post Office is a statutory corporation organized into three main businesses—letters, parcels, and counters. The counters business was established as a wholly owned subsidiary, Post Office Counters Ltd., in October 1987. The letters and parcels businesses are not separate legal entities, but they have their own internal accounts and are organizationally distinct. The Post Office derives its powers mainly from Section 7 of the Post Office Act 1969; it has the power to provide the various services specified there which include postal services, banking services, and services for Government. Section 59 of the British Telecommunication Act 1981 (BT Act 1981) requires the Post Office in exercising its powers to have regard to (1) efficiency and economy; (2) the social, industrial and commercial needs of the United Kingdom with respect to the matters subserved by its powers; (3) the desirability of improving and developing its operating systems; and (4) developments in the field of communications and banking. Additionally, The Secretary of State at the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) has the power (HMSO 1969) to direct the Post Office to do work of any kind for government departments and local authorities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albon, R. 1985. “Competition or Monopoly in Australia’s Postal Service?” Center for Independent Studies.
Albon, R. 1986. “A Cost-Related Pricing Structure for Inland Letters - the Cost and the Benefits.”
Albon, R. 1987. “Privatize the Post.” Center for Policy Studies.
Albon, R. 1989. “Some Observations on the Efficiency of British Postal Pricing, Applied Economics.”
Association of Metropolitan Authorities. 1990. “Bus Deregulation: The Metropolitan Experience.”
Bishop, M., and J. Kay. 1988. “Does Privatization Work?” Center for Business Strategy, LB S.
Brown, K. 1987. “Private Buses Run into Timetable Problems.” Financial Times (February 16 ).
Brown, S.J. and D.S. Sibley. 1986. “The Theory of Public Utility Pricing.” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Clarke, P. 1988. “Opening Up the Post Office.” Aims of Industry.
Cuthbertson, R., Richards, P. (1991 forthcoming) “An Econometric Study of the Demand for United Kingdom Inland Letters.” Review of Economics and Statistics.
Estrin, S., and D. de Meza. 1988. “Should the Post Office’s Statutory Monopoly be Lifted?” London School of Economics.
Faulhaber, R. 1975. “Cross-Subsidization: Pricing in Public Enterprises.” American Economic Review.
HMSO. 1969. `The Post Office Act.“
HMSO. 1978a. “The Nationalized Industries.” Cmnd 7232.
HMSO. 1978b. “The Post Office.” Cmnd 7292.
HMSO. 1981. “British Telecommunications Act.”
HMSO. 1984. “Buses.” Cmnd 9300.
Mail Users Association. 1989. “Deliver us from the Post Office”. London.
Mason, D. 1988. “Enlightenment.” Adam Smith Institute.
Mason, D. 1989. “Privatizing the Posts.” Adam Smith Institute.
Molyneux, R., and D. Thompson, 1987. `Nationalized Industry Performance: Still Third Rate?“ Fiscal Studies.
Monopolies and Mergers Commission. 1984. `The Post Office Letter Post Service.“ HMSO Cmnd 9332.
Neary, P. 1975. “An Econometric Study of Irish Postal Services.” The Economic and Social Research Institute Paper No. 80, Dublin.
Oftel. June 1990. “Report of Director General of Telecommunications.”
Post Office. 1979. `The Letter Monopoly, A Review.“
Post Office. 1986. “Report of the Steering Group on the Long Run Marginal Costs of the Inland Letter Service.”
Post Office Users National Council. 1989–90. “Annual Report.”
Pryke, R. 1981. `The Nationalized Industries.“ Oxford.
Scott, F.A. 1986. “Assessing USA Postal Ratemaking: An Application of Ramsey Prices.” Journal of Industrial Economics, 34. 279–290.
Senior, I. 1983. “Liberating the Letter.” Institute of Economic Affairs.
Tabor, R. 1987. “Can Competitors Pass ‘Go’ with a Natural Monopoly?” Public Finance and Accountancy.(May)
Tabor, R. 1987. “Who Benefits from ‘One Price for Everywhere’.” Public Finance and Accountancy.(June)
Union of Communication Workers. 1990. `The Last Post?“ London.
Bös, Dieter, and Lorenz Nett. 1989. “Privatization, Price Regulation and Market Entry. An Asymmetric Multistage Duopoly model.” Discussion paper 303, Rheinische FriedrichWilhelms-Universität Bonn.
Cuthbertson, R., and P. Richards. (Forthcoming.) “An Econometric Study of the Demand for UK Inland Letters.” Review of Economics and Statistics.
Salop, Steven C. 1979. “Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods.” Bell Journal 10: 141–156.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dobbs, I., Richards, P., Ireland, N. (1991). Assessing the Welfare Effects of Entry into Letter Delivery. In: Crew, M.A., Kleindorfer, P.R. (eds) Competition and Innovation in Postal Services. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4818-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4818-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5127-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4818-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive