Skip to main content

Assessing the Welfare Effects of Entry into Letter Delivery

  • Chapter
Competition and Innovation in Postal Services

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series ((TREP,volume 8))

Abstract

The United Kingdom Post Office is a statutory corporation organized into three main businesses—letters, parcels, and counters. The counters business was established as a wholly owned subsidiary, Post Office Counters Ltd., in October 1987. The letters and parcels businesses are not separate legal entities, but they have their own internal accounts and are organizationally distinct. The Post Office derives its powers mainly from Section 7 of the Post Office Act 1969; it has the power to provide the various services specified there which include postal services, banking services, and services for Government. Section 59 of the British Telecommunication Act 1981 (BT Act 1981) requires the Post Office in exercising its powers to have regard to (1) efficiency and economy; (2) the social, industrial and commercial needs of the United Kingdom with respect to the matters subserved by its powers; (3) the desirability of improving and developing its operating systems; and (4) developments in the field of communications and banking. Additionally, The Secretary of State at the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) has the power (HMSO 1969) to direct the Post Office to do work of any kind for government departments and local authorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albon, R. 1985. “Competition or Monopoly in Australia’s Postal Service?” Center for Independent Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albon, R. 1986. “A Cost-Related Pricing Structure for Inland Letters - the Cost and the Benefits.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Albon, R. 1987. “Privatize the Post.” Center for Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albon, R. 1989. “Some Observations on the Efficiency of British Postal Pricing, Applied Economics.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Metropolitan Authorities. 1990. “Bus Deregulation: The Metropolitan Experience.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, M., and J. Kay. 1988. “Does Privatization Work?” Center for Business Strategy, LB S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. 1987. “Private Buses Run into Timetable Problems.” Financial Times (February 16 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.J. and D.S. Sibley. 1986. “The Theory of Public Utility Pricing.” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. 1988. “Opening Up the Post Office.” Aims of Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbertson, R., Richards, P. (1991 forthcoming) “An Econometric Study of the Demand for United Kingdom Inland Letters.” Review of Economics and Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., and D. de Meza. 1988. “Should the Post Office’s Statutory Monopoly be Lifted?” London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulhaber, R. 1975. “Cross-Subsidization: Pricing in Public Enterprises.” American Economic Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO. 1969. `The Post Office Act.“

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO. 1978a. “The Nationalized Industries.” Cmnd 7232.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO. 1978b. “The Post Office.” Cmnd 7292.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO. 1981. “British Telecommunications Act.”

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO. 1984. “Buses.” Cmnd 9300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mail Users Association. 1989. “Deliver us from the Post Office”. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, D. 1988. “Enlightenment.” Adam Smith Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, D. 1989. “Privatizing the Posts.” Adam Smith Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, R., and D. Thompson, 1987. `Nationalized Industry Performance: Still Third Rate?“ Fiscal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monopolies and Mergers Commission. 1984. `The Post Office Letter Post Service.“ HMSO Cmnd 9332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neary, P. 1975. “An Econometric Study of Irish Postal Services.” The Economic and Social Research Institute Paper No. 80, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oftel. June 1990. “Report of Director General of Telecommunications.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Post Office. 1979. `The Letter Monopoly, A Review.“

    Google Scholar 

  • Post Office. 1986. “Report of the Steering Group on the Long Run Marginal Costs of the Inland Letter Service.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Post Office Users National Council. 1989–90. “Annual Report.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryke, R. 1981. `The Nationalized Industries.“ Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, F.A. 1986. “Assessing USA Postal Ratemaking: An Application of Ramsey Prices.” Journal of Industrial Economics, 34. 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senior, I. 1983. “Liberating the Letter.” Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabor, R. 1987. “Can Competitors Pass ‘Go’ with a Natural Monopoly?” Public Finance and Accountancy.(May)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabor, R. 1987. “Who Benefits from ‘One Price for Everywhere’.” Public Finance and Accountancy.(June)

    Google Scholar 

  • Union of Communication Workers. 1990. `The Last Post?“ London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bös, Dieter, and Lorenz Nett. 1989. “Privatization, Price Regulation and Market Entry. An Asymmetric Multistage Duopoly model.” Discussion paper 303, Rheinische FriedrichWilhelms-Universität Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbertson, R., and P. Richards. (Forthcoming.) “An Econometric Study of the Demand for UK Inland Letters.” Review of Economics and Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salop, Steven C. 1979. “Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods.” Bell Journal 10: 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dobbs, I., Richards, P., Ireland, N. (1991). Assessing the Welfare Effects of Entry into Letter Delivery. In: Crew, M.A., Kleindorfer, P.R. (eds) Competition and Innovation in Postal Services. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4818-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4818-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5127-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4818-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics