Methodological Conclusion

  • Masudul Alam Choudhury
Chapter

Abstract

Our critical study in this book has pointed out the limitations of economic theory in addressing great human problems. It then points to certain alternatives that lie beyond. We will discourse on what lies beyond traditional economic theory in the classical, neoclassical, Keynesian and monetarist doctrines that we have examined in this book. Many economic doctrines have come and gone leaving no permanence in our understanding of the underlying forces that shape the human world. Marxism as a branch of classical economic theory became marginalized with the fall of Soviet Union, the Berlin Wall and the rise of the capitalist order. The global capitalist order only a few years in its making has unleashed high uncertainty in a groping world. Faced with such uncertain interactions between purely economic forces and political interests, it has now become increasingly difficult to project any degree of efficacy in economic prediction and forecasting. The complexity of human issues with deep economic and political interests in them can never assume such a domain of interactions to be optimal in preferences and behaviour. Human beings and economic agents are therefore far from being rational agents as depicted in economic theory. The reason for such departure from prescriptive behaviour of purely economic agents due to politico-economic interactions that are now seen to take place between markets and institutions taken up in the widest sense.

Keywords

World Trade Organization World View Rational Expectation Knowledge Flow Exchange Rate Volatility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aristotle, trans. Welldon, J.E.C. 1987. The Nicomachean Ethics (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books).Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K.J. 1974. The Limits of Organization (New York, NY: W.W. Norton ).Google Scholar
  3. Barrow, J.D. 1991. Theo ries of Everything, the Quest for Ultimate Explanation (Oxford, Eng: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  4. Beausejour, L. Lenjosek, G. and Smart, M. 1992. An Environmental CGE Model of Canada and the United States (Working Paper No. 92–04, Ottawa, Ont: Department of Finance, Fiscal Policy and Economic Analysis Branch ).Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G.S. 1989. “Family,” in Eatwell, J. Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave: Social Economics ( New York NY: W.W. Norton ) pp. 64–77.Google Scholar
  6. Beed, C. and Kane, O. 1991. “What is the critique of the mathematization of economics?” Kyklos, Vol. 44, No. 4, 581–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaug, M. 1968. Economic Theory in Retrospect (Homewood, ILL: Richard D. Irwin ) pp. 30–32.Google Scholar
  8. Boland, L.A. 1991. “On the methodology of economic model building,” in his The Methodology of Economic Model Building (London, Eng: Routledge ) pp. 39–63.Google Scholar
  9. Boulding, K.E. 1955. Economic Analysis ( New York, NY: Harper and Row) particularly note his explanation of expectational equilibrium in Chap. 33.Google Scholar
  10. Buchanan, J.M. 1975. “Postconstitutional contract: the theory of public goods,” in his The Limits of Liberty, Between Anarchy and Leviathan (Chicago, ILL: The University of Chicago Press) Chap. 3.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, D.T. ed. Overman, E.S. 1988. Methodology and Epistemology for Social Science (Chicago, ILL: University of Chicago Press) pp. viii-ix.Google Scholar
  12. Choudhury, M.A. 1989. Islamic Economic Co-operation (London, Eng: Macmillan and New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press).Google Scholar
  13. Choudhury, M.A. 1993a. A Theory of Ethico-Economics, being a special issue of Humanomics, Vol. 9, Nos. 1/2, 159 pages.Google Scholar
  14. Choudhury, M.A. 1993b. “The concept of regional development in the context of globalization,” Borneo Review, Vol.Google Scholar
  15. V, No. 2, pp. 91–108.Google Scholar
  16. Choudhury, M.A. 1994a. “The concept of sustainable development: from Rio to Ethics,” Journal Ekonomi Malaysia, No. 28, pp. 69–92.Google Scholar
  17. Choudhury, M.A. 1994c. “Islamization of knowledge, the epistemological question,” Journal of the Faculty of Islamic Studies and Arabic, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 168–215.Google Scholar
  18. Choudhury, M.A. 1995. “Reality and Tawhidi timal topology embedded in supermanifold of knowledge” (Chap. 9), “Analytics of the Tawhidi nexuses of trajectories” (Chap. 10), in his The Epistemological Foundations of Islamic Economic, Social and Scientific Order, Vol. V (of six volumes) (Ankara, Turkey: Statistical, Economic and Social Research and Training Centre for Islamic Countries, Organization of Islamic Conferences)Google Scholar
  19. Choudhury, M.A. 1996a. “A theory of social systems: family and ecology as examples,” Kybernetes, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Choudhury, M.A. 1996b. “A process view of economic methodology in the light of global change,” The Indian Journal of Economics, Vol. LXXVI, No. 303, pp. 527–37.Google Scholar
  21. Choudhury, M.A. 1996c. “Why cannot neoclassicism explain resource allocation and development in the Islamic political economy?” in Ahmed, E. ed. Role of Private Sectors in Economic Development in an Islamic Perspective ( Hemdon, VA: International Institute of Islamic Thought ) pp. 19–44.Google Scholar
  22. Dampier, W.C. 1961. “Scientific philosophy and its outlook,” in his A History of Science and Its Relations with Philosophy and Religion (Cambridge, Eng: Cambridge at the University Press ) pp. 455–501.Google Scholar
  23. Descartes, R. 1954. “Discourse on method,” in Linscott, R.N. and Commins, S. eds. Man and the Universe: The Philosophers of Science (New York, NY: Pocket Books, Inc.) pp. 163–220.Google Scholar
  24. Einstein, A. undated. “The laws of science and the laws of ethics,” in his Essays in Physics (New York, NY: Philosophical Library)Google Scholar
  25. Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press )Google Scholar
  26. Gleick, J. 1987. Chaos, Making a New Science (New York, NY: Viking Penguin). Goulet, D. 1995. Development Ethics ( New York, NY: The Apex Press).Google Scholar
  27. Hammond, P.J. 1987. “On reconciling Arrow’s Theory of Social Choice with Harsanyi’s fundamental utilitarianism,” in Feiwel, G.R. ed. Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy (London, Eng: Macmillan ) pp 179–221.Google Scholar
  28. Hawking, S.W. 1992. A Brief History of Time, From Big Bang to Black Holes (New York, NY: Bantam Books, Inc. )Google Scholar
  29. Hawking, S.W. 1980. “Is the end in sight for theoretical physics?” (Cambridge, Eng: Cambridge University Press) reprinted in Boslough, J. 1985, Stephen Hawking’s Universe ( New York, NY: Avon Books ) pp. 119–39.Google Scholar
  30. Hampton, J. 1989. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition (Cambridge, Eng: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  31. Hawley, A.H. 1986. Human Ecology, A Theoretical Essay (Chicago, ILL: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  32. Heilbroner, R.L. 1986. “The ideology of capital,” in his The Nature and Logic of Capitalism ( New York, NY: W.W. Norton) Chap. 5.Google Scholar
  33. Howard, D. 1985. From Marx to Kant ( Albany, NY: State University of New York).Google Scholar
  34. Kant, I. trans. Friedrich, C.J. 1949. “Religion within the limits of reason alone,” in Friedrich, C.J. ed. The Philosophy of Kant ( New York, NY: Modern Library ) pp. 365–411.Google Scholar
  35. Kellert, S.H. 1994. “What is chaos theory?” in his In the Wake of Chaos (Chicago, ILL: The University of Chicago Press) Chap. 1.Google Scholar
  36. Kuhn, T.S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolution (Chicago, ILL: University of Chicago Press). Laplace, M. de, 1951. A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities (New York, NY: Dover Publications). Leibniz, G. trans. Schrecher, D.L.A. 1965. Monadology (New York, NY: Bobbs Merrill ).Google Scholar
  37. Maxwell, G. 1962. “The ontological status of theoretical entities,” in Feigl, H. Maxwell, G. eds. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II: Scientific Explanation, Space and Time (Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press ) pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
  38. Minford, P. and Peel, D. 1983. “Rational expectations models: the basic method,” in their Rational Expectations and the New Macroeconomics (Oxford, Eng: Martin Robertson) Chap. 2.Google Scholar
  39. Nagel, E. 1961. “The reduction of theories,” in his The Structure of Science, Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation (New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc.) Chap. 11.Google Scholar
  40. Nato, T. 1988. “On the understanding of meanings of subjectivity in social science,” Humanomics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 15–30.Google Scholar
  41. O’Donnell, R.M. 1989. “Types of probabilities and their measurement” (pp. 50–66), also “Epistemology” (pp. 81–105) in his Keynes: Philosophy, Economics and Politics (London, Eng: Macmillan Press Ltd).Google Scholar
  42. Osborne, M.J. and Rubinstein, A. 1994. A Course in Game Theory (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press ) pp. 219–22.Google Scholar
  43. Parikh, J.K. 1992. “Restructuring consumption patterns for sustainability,” Network, No. 20, Oct.Google Scholar
  44. Popper, K.R. 1972. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (London, Eng: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  45. Rawls. J. 1971, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press )Google Scholar
  46. Rhoads, S.E. 1985. “Kind hearts and opportunity costs,” in his The Economist’s View of the World (Cambridge, Eng: Cambridge University Press ) pp. 40–7.Google Scholar
  47. Rucker, R. 1983. “The one and the many,” in his Infinity and the Mind, the Science and Philosophy of the Infinite ( New York, NY: Bantam Books) Chap. 5.Google Scholar
  48. Russell, B. 1990a, “Bergson,” in his A History of Western Philosophy (London, Eng: Unwin Paperbacks ) pp. 756–65.Google Scholar
  49. Russell, B. 1990b. “Spinoza,” in his A History of Western Philosophy, op cit. pp. 552–62. Samuelson, P.A. 1970. Foundations of Economic Analysis (New York, NY: Atheneum ).Google Scholar
  50. Shackle, G.L.S. 1972. Epistemics and Economics: A Critique of Economic Theory (Cambridge, Eng: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  51. Sherover, C.M. 1972. Heidegger, Kant and Time ( Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
  52. Smith, A. ed. Cannan, E. 1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Chicago, ILL: The University of Chicago Press ) pp. 213–340.Google Scholar
  53. Shakun, M.F. 1988. Evolutionary Systems Design, Policy Making under Complexity and Group Decision Support Systems (Oakland, CA: Holden-Day, Inc.).Google Scholar
  54. Shubik, M. 1989. “Cooperative games,” in Eatwell, J. Milgate, M. and Newman, P. eds. The New Palgrave: Game Theory ( New York, NY: W.W. Norton ) pp. 103–7.Google Scholar
  55. Thurow, L. 1983. Dangerous Currents, the State of Economics (New york, NY: Random House).Google Scholar
  56. Whitehead, A.N. ed. Griffin, D.R. and Sherburne, D.W. 1979. Process and Reality ( New York, NY: The Free Press ) pp. 342–43.Google Scholar
  57. Wolff, R.P. 1977. A Reconstruction of a Critique of a Theory of Justice: Understanding Rawls ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masudul Alam Choudhury

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations