Skip to main content

Soil Amendments Promote Vegetation Establishment and Control Acidity in Coal Combustion Waste

  • Chapter
Chemistry of Trace Elements in Fly Ash

Abstract

The effects of adding various soil amendments and a pyrite oxidation inhibitor to aid in the establishment of vegetation and to reduce acid drainage (AD) from coal fly ash and coal reject (FA + CR*) were assessed in an outdoor mesocosm study. Preliminary greenhouse experiments and field observations at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site (SRS) indicated that plants would not survive in this material without altering its physical and chemical characteristics. Samples of mixed FA + CR were obtained from a field site at the SRS. The following treatments were used: Biosolid only (Treatment A), Biosolid + Surfactant (Treatment B), Topsoil + Surfactant (Treatment C), and Biosolid + Topsoil + Surfactant (Treatment D). Leaching was induced due to inadequate rainfall. Loblolly pine seedlings (Pinus taeda) inoculated with ectomycorrhizal fungi — Pisolithus tinctorius (Pt) and Scleroderma cepa (Sc) — were transplanted into each mesocosm tank. Soil solution samplers were installed in each unit at 15 and 41 cm depths. Samples were taken periodically and measured for pH, EC, and other parameters.

The results indicate that the addition of amendments can aid in the revegetation of a FA + CR landfill and control AD. Pine seedlings growing in treatments with biosolid application were significantly taller than the treatment without it; however, there were no significant differences concerning diameter, biomass, and plant tissue concentrations of Al, Fe, and Mn for the pines. Biosolid addition also appears to be effective for mitigating proton generation. Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and topsoil addition were not as important to plant survival and growth as biosolid addition; nonetheless, SLS and topsoil addition did not appear to be disadvantageous to growth in the treatment with biosolid addition (Treatment D). Based on leachate data, the topsoil + surfactant treatment had a much lower initial pH (pH ~ 3 or below) than the other treatments, and Al concentrations were correspondingly high. Electrical conductivity, in general, has been decreasing since the inseption of the study and appears to indicate that the addition of biosolid + surfactant (Treatment B) is the most effective treatment for inducing the lowest sulfate and metal concentrations. Preliminary results indicate that the use of amendments is essential for palant growth and establishment in pyrite enriched coal waste sites.

CR = coal reject — refers to raw coal discarded due to its low combustion quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Punshon, T., Seaman J. C., and Sajwan, K. S., Introduction: The production and use of coal combustion products, in Chemistry of Trace Elements in Fly Ash, Sajwan, K.S., Alva, A.K. and Keefer, R.F., Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adriano, D. C., Trace Elements in Terrestrial Environments, Second Edition, Springer, New York, 2001, Chap. 3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Adriano, D. C. and Weber, J. T., Influence of fly ash on soil physical properties and turfgrass establishment, J Environ. Qual., 30, 596, 2001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adriano, D. C., Page, A. L., Elseewi, A. A., Chang, A. C., and Straughan, I., Utilization and disposal of fly ash and other coal residues in terrestrial ecosystems: a review, J Environ. Qual., 9, 333, 1980.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carlson, C. L. and Adriano, D. C., Environmental impacts of coal combustion residues, J Environ. Qual., 22 (2), 227, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Keefer, R.F., Coal ashes — Industrial Wastes or Beneficial Byproducts? in Trace Elements in Coal and Coal Combustion Residues, Keefer, R. F. and. Sajwan, K. S., Eds., Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, 1993, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rowe, C. L., Hopkins, W. A., and Coffman, V.R., Failed recruitment of southern toads (Bufo terrestres) in a trace element-contaminated breeding habitat: direct and indirect effects that may lead to a local population sink, Arch. Environ. Cont. Toxicol., 40, 399, 2001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Barton, C. D., Marx, D. C., Adriano, D. C., and Bartley, H., Use of a vegetative cover to control acidic drainage from coal combustion waste, in Proceeding of the American Society For Mining Reclamation; 19th Annual National meeting, Barnheisel, R. I., Ed., ASSMR, Lexington, KY, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Evangelou, V. P., and Zhang, Y. L., A review: pyrite oxidation mechanisms and acid mine drainage prevention, Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Tec., 25 (2), 141, 1995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nordstrom, D. K., Aqueous pyrite oxidation and the consequent formation of secondary iron minerals, in Acid sulfate weathering, Soil Science Society of America Special Publication 10, Kittrick, J.A., et al., Ed.,. Madison, WI, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kleinman, R., L., P., and Rastogi, V., Reducing acid mine drainage liabilities using bactericides & other control technologies, in 13th Annual National Meeting American Society for Surface Mining and Reclamation Workshop #8, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kleinman, R., L., P., and Erickson, P. M., Control of acid drainage from coal refuse using anionic surfactants, Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations 8847, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barton, C., Romanek, R., Seaman, J., and Paddock, L., Geochemistry of an abandoned landfill containing coal combustion waste: implications for remediation, in Chemistry of Trace Elements in Fly Ash, Sajwan, K.S., Alva, A.K. and Keefer, R.F., Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blowes, D. W., Reardon, E. J., Jambor, J. L., and Cherry, J. A., The formulation and potential importance of cemented layers in inactive sulfide mine tailings, Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta, 55, 965, 1991.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nordstrom, D. K., Alpers, C. N., Ptacek, C. J., and Blowes, D W., Negative pH and extremely acidic mine waters from Iron Mountain, California, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 254, 2000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas, G. W., Problems encountered in soil testing methods, in Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, Part 1, SSSA Spec. Publ. 2, SSSA, Madison, WI. 1967, 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas, G. W., and Hargrove, W. H., The chemistry of soil acidity, in Soil acidity and liming, 2nd Ed. Agronomy Monographs 12, ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Adams, F., Ed., Madison, WI, 1984, 3–56.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sparks, D. L., Environmental Soil Chemistry,CA Academic Press, San Diego, 1995, Chap. 10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Danker, R.M., Adriano, D.C., Koo, BJ., Barton, C.D., Punshon, T. (2003). Soil Amendments Promote Vegetation Establishment and Control Acidity in Coal Combustion Waste. In: Sajwan, K.S., Alva, A.K., Keefer, R.F. (eds) Chemistry of Trace Elements in Fly Ash. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4757-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4757-7_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3401-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4757-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics