Abstract
In general, this book has involved exploration of themes related to fluid capital. More explicitly, it has examined the implications of three definitions, one relating to a concept of capital and the other two relating to two macroeconomic identities. The definition of fluid capital provides a root concept of capital from which virtually all existing notions of capital can be connected and rationalized. The two identities, in contrast, involve equalities between the value of production in current prices and the income the production generates, and between the value of goods in the pool of fluid capital and the corresponding value of claims on the same.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
As should be evident from these paragraphs, it is inappropriate in my view to measure changes in the general price level in terms of standard Laspeyres price indices. Only current-quantity weighted chain indices provide meaningful measures of inflation and deflation.
This will be true, moreover, even in situations in which the stock of money is changed exogenously, as was the case (for example) when East and West Germany merged in 1990. Because of the pegging of the two marks at close to par, there was, in effect, a once-and-for-all increase in the stock of marks, with no offsetting increase in the pool of fluid capital. Again, there is no reason to assume that the part of the increased stock of marks that sought outlet against goods would be spread proportionately.
That capital has to finance both current production and investment in produced means of production has generally been overlooked in the literature on capital theory. A notable, but partial, exception was R.G. Hawtrey in his two early volumes on the trade cycle, Good and Bad Trade (1913) and Currency and Credit (1919). Hawtrey’s focus, however, was on the general availability of money and credit, rather than the relationship of these to fluid capital.
Right’ in this context is taken to mean that the pool of purchasing power that is created is consistent with a stable general price level.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taylor, L.D. (2000). Themes and Counterthemes: Fluid Capital in Retrospect. In: Capital, Accumulation, and Money. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4709-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4709-6_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4711-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4709-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive