Redesigning the Calculus Sequence at a Research University

Faculty, Professional Development, and Institutional Issues
  • Harvey B. Keynes
  • Andrea M. Olson
  • Dan O’Loughlin
  • Douglas Shaw


One of the major objectives of many reformed calculus projects is to create a challenging sequence that helps students better understand how to use calculus as a tool both for mathematical analysis and for solving problems in other disciplines. This objective is widely recognized by the scientific community.


Professional Development Calculus Sequence Secondary Teacher Postdoctoral Student Administrative Effort 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy (COSEPUP), The Mathematical Sciences: Their Structure and Contributions. Report of the Senior Assessment Panel of the International Assessment of the U.S. Mathematical Sciences (GPRA Report) ( National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 1998 ) 8–14.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Tucker and J. James (eds.) Assessing Calculus Reform Efforts, ( Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 1995 ).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Wilson, “A Decade of Teaching Reform Calculus Has Been a Disaster, Critics Charge,” The Chronicle of Higher Education 43(Feb. 7, 1997):Al2—A13.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Wu, The Joy of Lecturing—With a Critique of the Romantic Tradition in Education Writing, Department of Mathematics #3840. ( University of California. Berkeley, 1998 ) 1–12.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Keynes and A. Olson, Redesigning the Calculus Sequence at a Research University: Issues, Implementation, and Objectives, Proceedings of the International Commission on Mathematics Instruction ( ICMI ), Singapore, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Keynes and A. Olson, Calculus Reform as a Lever for Changing Curriculum and Instruction, Proceedings Fourth World Conference on Engineering Education, St. Paul, MN, 1995, pp. 248–251.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Committee on Undergraduate Science Education Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education National Research Council (NRC), Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999 ).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Smith, “Renewal in Collegiate Mathematics Education,” Documenta Mathematica Extra Volume ICM (1998):777–786.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. W. Chickering and Z. E Gamson (eds.), “Applying the Seven Principles of Good Practice in Undergraduate Education,” in New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 47 ( Jossey—Bass, San Francisco, 1991 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harvey B. Keynes
  • Andrea M. Olson
  • Dan O’Loughlin
  • Douglas Shaw

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations