Abstract
Comparative statics under uncertainty often differ dramatically from comparative statics under certainty. Under certainty, fixed costs that are sunk don’t affect supply. Sandmo (1971), however, showed that, if a finn fazes price uncertainty and is risk averse, then changes in fixed costs can affect its supply. Under certainty, input demands slope downward in own prices. Batra and Ullah (1974) however, showed that, if the finn faces price uncertainty and is risk averse, input demands might slope upward. Under certainty, either increasing the rate of return of an asset or decreasing its price trivially never decreases its demand (when other assets are present). Fishburn and Porter (1976) showed that increasing the rate of return of a safe asset in the presence of other risky assets might lead to lower demand for the safe asset, whereas Cheng, Magill and Shafer (1987) showed that increasing the price of a risky asset could raise its demand. In each case, the comparative statics result is preserved if the agent is assumed risk neutral, or if restrictions are imposed upon risk preferences.
I thank Susan Athey, Michele Cohen, Christian Gollier, Jack Meyer, Mike Ormiston and participants at the FUR VIII conference in Mom, Belgium for helpful comments and discussion. Part of this work was carried out during my visit to IDEI, University of Toulouse, during the fall of 1996; I an most grateful to that institute for its kind hospitality and support.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Batra, R. and A. Ullah, “Competitive Firm and the Theory of Input Demand under Uncertainty. ” Journal of Political Economy 82 (1974): 537–548.
Cheng, H., M. Magill and W. Shafer, “Some Results on Comparative Statics Under Uncertainty,” International Economic Review 28 (1987): 493–507.
Fishburn, P. and Porter, B., “Optimal Portfolios with One Safe and One Risky Asset: Effects of Changes in Rate of Return and Risk,” Management Science 22 (1976): 1064–1073.
Gollier, C., “The Comparative Statics of Changes in Risk Revisited,” Journal of Economic Theory 66 (1995): 522–536.
Gollier, C. and E. Schlee, “Increased Risk Taking with Multiple Risk,” (1997) working paper.
Hadar, J. and W. Russell, “Applications in Economic Theory and Analysis,” in Stochastic Dominance (G. Whitmore and M. Findlay, Eds.), Chap. 7, Lexington Books, Lexington MA, 1978.
Hadar, J. and K. Seo. “The Effect of Shifts in a Return Distribution on Optimal Portfolios,” International Economic Review 31 (1990): 721–736.
Jewitt, L “Risk Aversion and the Choice Between Risky Prospects: The Preservation of Comparative Statics Results,” Review of Economic Studies 54 (1987): 73–85.
Kimball, M. “Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large,” Econometrica 58 (1990): 53–73.
Leland, H. “Saving and Uncertainty: The Precautionary Demand for Saving” Quarterly Journal of Economics 82 (1968): 465–473.
Milgrom, P. “Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications,” Bell Journal of Economics 12 (1981): 380–391.
Milgrom, P. and Shannon, C. “Monotone Comparative Statics,” Econometrica 62 (1994): 157–180.
Ormiston, M. and J. Meyer “The Effect on Optimal Portfolios of Changing the Return to a Risky Asset: The Case of Dependent Returns,” International Economic Review 35 (1994): 603–612.
Ormiston, M.. and E. Schlee, “Necessary Conditions for Comparative Statics Under Uncertainty,” Economics Letters 40 (1992): 429–434.
Ormiston, M.. and E. Schlee, “Comparative Statics Under Uncertainty for a Class of Economic Agents,” Journal of Economic Theory 61 (1993): 412–422.
Sandmo, A. “On the Theory of the Competitive Firm Under Price Uncertainty,” American Economic Review 61 (1971): 65–73.
Schlee, E. “Multivariate Risk Aversion and Consumer Choice,” International Economic Review 30 (1990): 737–745.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schlee, E.E. (1999). The Preservation of Comparative Statics under Uncertainty. In: Machina, M.J., Munier, B. (eds) Beliefs, Interactions and Preferences in Decision Making. Theory and Decision Library, vol 40. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4592-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4592-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5096-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4592-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive