Skip to main content

Symmetrical Monotone Risk Aversion and Positive Bid-Ask Spreads

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLB,volume 40))

Abstract

A usual argument in finance refers to no arbitrage opportunities for the positivity of the bid-ask spread. Here we follow the decision theory approach and show that if positivity of the bid-ask spread becomes identified with strong risk aversion for an expected utility market-maker, this is no longer true for a rank-dependent expected utility one. For such a decision-maker only a very weak form of risk aversion is required, a result which seems more in accordance with his actual behavior. We conclude by showing that the no-trade interval result of Dow and Werlang (1992) remains valid for a rank-dependent expected utility market-maker merely exhibiting this weak form of risk aversion.

Presented at the 8th conference on the Foundations and Applications of Utility, Risk and Decision Theory, Mons (Belgium), July 2–5, 1997.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abouda, M. and Chateauneuf, A. (1998a). Positivity of bid-ask spreads and symmetrical monotone risk averse. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abouda, M. and Chateauneuf, A. (1998b). A characterization of the symmetrical monotone risk aversion in the RDEU model. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allais, M., (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école américaine. Econometrica, 21, 503–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Amihud, Y. and Mendelson, H. (1980). Dealership Market: Market Making with Inventory. Journal of Financial Economics, 8, 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arrow, K.J. (1965). The theory of Risk aversion, Chapter 2 of Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing. Helsinki: Yrjo Jahnson in Saatio.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Biais, B. (1993). Price Formation and Equilibrium Liquidity in Fragmented and Centralized Markets. Journal of Finance, 48, 157–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chateauneuf, A. (1991). On the use of capacities in modeling uncertainty aversion and risk aversion. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 20, 343–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chateauneuf, A., M. D. Cohen, and I. Meilijson (1997a). New tools to better model behavior under risk and uncertainty: An overview. Finance, 18, 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chateauneuf, A., M. D. Cohen, and I. Meilijson (1997b). More pessimism than greediness: A characterization of monotone risk aversion in the RDEU model. Cahiers d’Ecomath, 97. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chew, S., E. Karni, and Z. Safra (1987). Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 42, 370–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen, M. (1995). Risk aversion concepts in expected and non-expected utility models. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance theory, 20, 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dow, J., and Werlang S. (1992). Uncertainty aversion, risk aversion, and the optimal choice of portfolio. Econometrica, 60,No. 1, 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eeckhoudt, L. and Gollier, C. (1992). Les risques financiers, Ediscience International.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eeckhoudt, L. and Roger, P. (1998). Risk Aversion and the Bid-Ask spread. European Financial Management, Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  15. La Vallée, I. (1968). On Cash Equivalence and Information Evaluation in Decision under and Uncertainty, part I, Basic Theory. Journal of The American Statistical Association, 63, 252–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 3, 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Quiggin, J. (1991). Comparative Statistics for Rank-Dependent Expected Utility Theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roger, P. (1998). Properties of Bid-Ask spread in RDEU model. Working Paper. Université de Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rothschild, M., and Stiglitz J. (1970). Increasing Risk: I. A definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmeidler, D. (1989). Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica, 57, 517–587. First version: Subjective expected utility without additivity, Foerder Institute Working Paper (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wakker, P. (1990). Under Stochastic Dominance Choquet Expected Utility and Anticipated Utility are identical. Theory and Decision, 29, 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yaari, M. (1987). The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55, 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abouda, M., Chateauneuf, A. (1999). Symmetrical Monotone Risk Aversion and Positive Bid-Ask Spreads. In: Machina, M.J., Munier, B. (eds) Beliefs, Interactions and Preferences in Decision Making. Theory and Decision Library, vol 40. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4592-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4592-4_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5096-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4592-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics