Abstract
We use the Estimation Classification (EC) estimator first introduced and utilised in El-Gamal and Grether (1995) to study the extent to which individual decision making under uncertainty is shaped by the simplicity of application of various heuristics. In particular, we consider the representativeness heuristic, which figured prominently in earlier empirical results. We study two sets of data from two experiments conducted recently at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, where we employed two designs. One of the designs was used in our previous research and makes the representativeness heuristic readily available to the subjects, whereas the other design does not. In one experimental session, we started with the first design and switched to the second, and in the other session the order of the designs was reversed. We find strong evidence that the ease with which subjects can use the representativeness heuristic influences their tendency to use it. This is evidence for a long-held view in the bounded rationality literature that — other things constant — individuals tend to use heuristics which are more readily available to them.
This research was funded by NSF grant SBR-9320497. We are grateful to our colleagues at the University of Wisconsin in Madison’s Economics Department for allowing us to recruit subjects in their classes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baltagi, B. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Wiley. 1995.
Edwards, W. “Conservatism in Human Information Processing”. In Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (eds.). Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1982.
El-Gamal, M. and D. Grether. “Are People Bayesian? Uncovering Behavioral strategies ”. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1995:90(432).
El-Gamal, M. and D. Grether. “Unknown Heterogeneity, the EC-EM Algorithm, and Large T Approximation”. SSRI working paper #9622, University of Wisconsin at Madison. 1996.
El-Gamal, M. and D. Grether. “A Monte Carlo Study of EC-Estimation in Panel Data Models with Limited Dependent Variables and Heterogeneity”. In Hsiao, C., L-F Lee, K. Lahiri and M. H. Pesaran (eds.). Analysis of Panels and Limited Dependent Variable Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1998a.
El-Gamal, M. and D. Grether. “Uncovering Heterogeneity in Behavioral Strategies”. In Ritschard, G., F. Berchtold and D. Zighed (eds.). Apprentissage des Principes Naturels aux Modèles Artificiels. Paris: Hermes. 1998b, 61–72.
Hisao, C. Analysis of Panel Data. Econometric Society Monographs, No. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1986.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. “Subjective Probability: A Judgement of Representativeness”. Cognitive Psychology. 1972: 51.
Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahnemann. “Rational choice and the framing of decisions”. Journal of Business. 1986: 59.
Wagenaar, W. A., G. Keren and S. Lichtenstein. “Islanders and hostages: Deep and surface structure of decision problems”. Acta Psychologica. 1988: 67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
El-Gamal, M.A., Grether, D.M. (1999). Changing Decision Rules. In: Machina, M.J., Munier, B. (eds) Beliefs, Interactions and Preferences in Decision Making. Theory and Decision Library, vol 40. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4592-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4592-4_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5096-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4592-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive