Abstract
Behavior analysis has had a pervasive influence on the field of developmental disabilities. This is evident from the proliferation of behaviorally based interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities; from course content and textbooks on behavior approaches included in the curricula of training programs in special education; from the number of advertisements for positions in developmental disabilities in which skill in behavior analysis is a qualification; from the results of litigation mandating provision of services based on behaviorally based practices; and from policy, regulatory standards, and legislation regarding use of behaviorally based assessment and treatment in various situations (e.g., Reid, 1991). That is surely good news. On the other hand, there have been, and continue to be, notable failures and sources of dissatisfaction. We conclude that this is also good news because these failures force the field to continue to improve. This chapter will argue that continued interaction among basic science/theory, applied research, technology, and applied practice will provide the best source of improvement. In order to make this point, this chapter will (a) illustrate different types of interactions between basic science/theory, applied research, technology, and applied practice; (b) examine them in the context of developments in behavioral analysis and developmental disabilities; and (c) consider what they suggest for further advances.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Azrin, N. H. (1977). A strategy for applied research.: Learning based but outcome oriented. American Psychologist, 32, 140–149.
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.
Baron, A., & Perone, M. (1982). The place of human subject in the operant laboratory. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 143–158.
Belke, T. W. (2000). Studies of wheel-running reinforcement: Parameters of Herrnstein’s (1970) response-strength equation vary with schedule order. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 319–331.
Berg, W. K., Peck, S., Wacker, D. P., Harding, J., McComas, J., Richman, D., & Brown, K. (2000). The effects of presession exposure to attention on the results of assessments of attention as a reinforcer. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 463–477.
Binder, L. M., Dixon, M. R., & Ghezzi, P. M. (2000). A procedure to teach self-control to children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 233–237.
Cardwell, D. S. L. (1994). The Norton history of technology. London: Fontana Press.
Carr, E. G. (1977). The motivation of self-injurious behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 800–816.
Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.
Carr, E. G., Yarbrough, S. C., & Langdon, N. A. (1997). Effects of idiosyncratic stimulus variables on functional analysis outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 673–686.
Chandler, L. K., & Dahlquist, C. M. (2002). Functional assessment: Strategies to prevent and remediate challenging behavior in school settings. Columbus: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Cooper, L. J., Wacker, D. Brown, K., McComas, J. J., Peck, S. M., Drew, J., Asmus, J., & Kayser, K. (1999). Use of a concurrent operants paradigm to evaluate reinforcers during treatment of food refusal. Behavior Modification, 23, 3–40.
Davison, M., & McCarthy, D. (1988). The matching law: A research review. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum..
Day, H. M., Homer, R. H., & O’Neill, R. E. (1994). Multiple functions of problem behaviors:Assessment and intervention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 279–289.
Derby, K. M., Hagopian, L., Fisher, W. W., Richman, D., Augustine, M., Fahs, A., & Thompson,R. (2000). Functional analysis of aberrant behavior through measurement of separate response topographies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 113–117.
Derby, K. M., Wacker, D. P., Peck, S., Sasso, G., DeRaad, A., Berg, W., Asmus, J., & Ulrich,S. (1994). Functional analysis of separate topographies of aberrant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 267–278.
Deitz, S. M. (1978). Current status of applied behavior analysis: Science versus technology. American Psychologist, 33, 805–814.
Dixon, M. R., Benedict, H., & Larson, T. (2001). Functional analysis and treatment of inappropriate verbal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 361–363.
Epling, W., F., & Pierce, W. D. (1983). Applied behavior analysis: New directions from the laboratory. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 27–37.
Fisher, S. M., Iwata, B. A., & Mazaleski, J. L. (1997). Noncontingent delivery of arbitrary reinforcers as treatment for self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 239–249.
Fisher, W. W., & Mazur, J. E. (1997). Basic and applied research on choice responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 387–410.
Fisher, W. W., Ninness, H. A. C., Piazza, C. C., & Owen-DeSchryver, J. S. (1996). On the reinforcing effects of the content of verbal attention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 235–238.
Fisher, W. W, Piazza, C. C., & Chiang, C. L. (1996). Effects of equal and unequal reinforce duration during functional analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 117–120.
Heery,J.(1886).Scientific Writings of Joseph Henry.Washington:Smiths Institution.
Henry, J. (1886). Scientific writings of Joseph Henry. Washington: Smithsonian Institution. Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266.
Iwata, B. A. (1988). The development and adoption of controversial default technologies. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 149–157.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2,3–20,1982).
Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Dorsey, M. F., Zarcone, J. R., Vollmer, T. R., Smith, R. G., Rodgers, T. A., Lerman, D. C., Shore, B. A., Mazaleski, J. L., Goh, H. L., Cowdery, G. E., Kalsher, M. J., McCosh, K. C., & Willis, K. D. (1994). The functions of self-injurious behavior: An experimental-epidemiological analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 215–240.
Iwata, B. A., Wallace, M. D., Kahng, S., Lindberg, J. S., Roscoe, E. M., Conners, J., Hanley, G. P., Thompson, R. H., & Worsdell, A. S. (2000). Skill acquisition in the implementation of functional analysis methodology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 181–194.
Jacobs, E. A., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2000). Human performance on negative slope schedules of points exchangeable for money: A failure of molar maximization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 241–260.
Johnston, J. M. (1991). We need a new model of technology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 425–427.
Johnston, J. M. (1993). A model for developing and evaluating behavioral technology. In R. Van Houten & S. Axelrod (Eds.), Effective behavioral treatment: Issues and implementation (pp. 323–343 ). New York: Plenum.
Johnston, J. M. (1996). Distinguishing between applied research and practice. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 35–47.
Johnston, J. M. (2000). Behavior analysis and the R & D paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 141–148.
Kennedy, C. H., & Itkonen, T. (1993). Effects of setting events on the problem behavior of students with severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 321–327.
Kennedy, C. H., & Meyer, K. A. (1996). Sleep deprivation, allergy symptoms, and negatively reinforced problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 133–135.
Kennedy, C. H., Meyer, K. A., Werts, M. G., & Cushing, L. S. (2000). Effects of sleep deprivation on free-operant avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 333–345.
Lalli, J. S., & Kates, K. (1998). The effect of reinforcer preference on functional analysis out-comes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 79–90.
Lattal, K. A. (2001). The human side of animal behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 24, 147–161.
Lattal, K. A., & Neef, N. A. (1996). Recent reinforcement-schedule research and applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 213–230.
Mace, F. C. (1991). Technological to a fault or faulty approach to technology development? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 433–435.
Mace, F. C. (1994). Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 529–550.
Mace, F. C., & Knight, D. (1986). Functional analysis and treatment of severe pica. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 411–416.
Mace, F. C., & Lalli, J. S. (1991). Linking descriptive and experimental analysis in the treatment of bizarre speech. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 553–562.
Mace, F. C., McCurdy, B., & Quigley, E. A. (1990). A collateral effect of reward predicted by matching theory. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 197–205.
Mace, F. C., Neef, N. A., Shade, D., & Mauro, B. C. (1994). Limited matching on concurrent-schedule reinforcement of academic behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 585–596.
Martens, B. K., Halperin, S., Pummel, J. E., & Kilpatrick, D. (1990). Matching theory applied to contingent teacher attention. Behavioral Assessment, 12, 139–156.
Martens, B. K., & Houk, J. L. (1989). The application of Herrnstein’s law of effect to disruptive and on-task behavior of a retarded adolescent girl. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 17–27.
Martens, B. K., Lochner, D. G., & Kelly, S. Q. (1992). The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: A demonstration of matching theory. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25143–151.
McDowell, J. J. (1988). Matching theory in natural human environments. The Behavior Analyst 11, 95– 109.
Michael, J. (1980). Flight from behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 3, 1–24.
Morris, E. K. (1991). Deconstructing “technological to a fault.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 411–416.
Moxley, R. A. (1989). Some historical relationships between science and technology with implications for behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 12, 45–57.
Mueller, M. M., Wilczynski, S. M., Moore, J. W., Fusilier, I., & Trahant, D. (2001). Antecedent manipulations in a tangible condition: The effects of stimulus preference on aggression. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 237–240.
Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (1984). Practical implications of the matching law.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 17, 367– 380.
National Institutes of Health. (1991).Treatment of destructive behaviors in persons with developmental disabilities.
Neef, N. A. (1995). Research on training trainers in program implementation: An introduction and future directions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 297–299.
Neef, N. A. (2002). The past and future of behavior analysis in developmental disabilities: When good news is bad and bad news is good. Behavior Analyst Today.
Neef, N. A., Mace, E. C., & Shade, D. (1993). Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26,37–52.
Neef, N. A., Mace, E. C., Shea, M. C., & Shade, D. (1992). Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 691–69.
Neef, N. A., & Lutz, M. N. (2001). Assessment of variables affecting choice and application to classroom interventions. School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 239–252.
Neef, N. A., Shade, D., & Miller, M. S. (1994). Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 575–583.
Northup, J., Wacker, D., Sasso, G., Steege, M., Cigrand, K., Cook, J., & DeRaad, A. (1991). A brief functional analysis of aggressive and alternative behavior in an outdinic setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 509–522.
O’Reilly, M. F. (1995). Functional analysis and treatment of escape-maintained aggression correlated with sleep deprivation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 225–226.
O’Reilly, M. F., & Carey, Y. (1996). A preliminary analysis of the effects of prior classroom conditions on performance under analogue analysis conditions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 581–584.
Peck, S. M., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Cooper, L. J., Brown, K. A., Richman, D., McComas, J. J., Frischmeyer, P., & Millard, T. (1996). Choice-making treatment of young children’s severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 263–290.
Pelios, L., Morren, J., Tesch, D., & Axelrod, S. (1999). The impact of functional analysis methodology on treatment choice for self-injurious and aggressive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 185–195.
Pennypacker, H. S. (1986). The challenge of technology transfer: Buying in without selling out. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 147–156.
Pennypacker, H. S., & Hench, L. L. (1997). Making behavioral technology transferable. The Behavior Analyst, 20, 97–108.
Perone, M. (1985). On the impact of human operant research: Asymmetrical patterns of cross-citation between human and nonhuman research. The Behavior Analyst, 8, 185–189.
Petroski, H. (1992). The evolution of useful things. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Piazza, C. C., Hanley, G. P., Bowman, L. G., Ruyter, J. M., Lindauer, S. E., & Saiontz, D. M. (1997). Functional analysis and treatment of elopement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 653–672.
Piazza, C. C., Hanley, G. P., & Fisher, W. W. (1996). Functional analysis and treatment of cigarette pica. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 437–449.
Pierce, W. D., & Epling, W. F. (1995). The applied importance of research on the matching law. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 237–241.
Pindiprolu, S. S., Peterson, S. M. P., Rule, S., & Lignuaris /Kraft, B. (2003). Using Web-Mediated Experiential Case-Based Instruction to Teach Functional Behavioral Assessment Skills. Teacher Education in Special Education, 26, 1–16.
Poling, A., Ailing, K., & Fuqua, R. W. (1994). Self-and cross-citations in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis and the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior: 1983–1992. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 729–731.
Reid, D. H. (1991). Technological behavior analysis and societal impact: A human services perspective. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 437–439.
Repp, A. C., Felce, D., & Barton, L. E. (1988). Basing the treatment of stereotypic and self-injurious behaviors on hypotheses of their causes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 281–289.
Repp, A. C., & Karsh, K. G. (1994). Hypothesis-based interventions for tantrum behaviors of persons with developmental disabilities in school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 21–31.
Schwartz, I. S., & Baer, D. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189– 204.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1972). Cumulative record: A selection of papers. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts.
Stolz, S. B. (1981). Adoption of innovations from applied behavioral research: “Does anybody care?” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 491–505.
Strand, P. S. (2001). Momentum, matching, and meaning: Toward a fuller exploitation of operant principles. Behavior Analyst Today, 2, 170–175.
Van Camp, C. M., Lerman, D. C., Kelley, M. E., Roane, H. S., Contrucci, S. A., & Vorndran, C. M. (2000). Further analysis of idiosyncratic antecedent influences during the assessment and treatment of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 207–221.
Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., Roane, H. S., & Marcus, B. A. (1997). Negative side effects of noncontingent reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 161–164
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neef, N.A., Peterson, S.M. (2003). Developmental Disabilities. In: Lattal, K.A., Chase, P.N. (eds) Behavior Theory and Philosophy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4590-0_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4590-0_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3405-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4590-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive