Bone Densitometry in Osteoporosis Care

  • Michael R. McClung


Bone density testing has achieved a prominent role in the evaluation of patients with or at risk for osteoporosis. The original bone methods for measuring bone density were developed several decades ago. The transition of these technologies from the research setting to the patient care arena began as the relationships between bone density and fracture risk were defined and when a definition of postmenopausal osteoporosis, based on bone density values, was provided. The availability of treatments to increase bone density and reduce fracture risk propelled bone density testing into the clinical limelight. Clinical guidelines advocate widespread use of bone density testing, and indications for osteoporosis treatment are now based on bone density values. The number of bone density machines in clinical use has markedly increased in the past 5 years. Testing is no longer confined to the specialist’ s office or radiology centers. Machines are in primary care clinics and in small communities, and testing is available in pharmacies and grocery stores and at health fairs. New technologies and devices have been developed, with each providing different types of information. An international society now exists to address the needs of the clinical bone density community.


Bone Mineral Density Bone Loss Femoral Neck Vertebral Fracture Fracture Risk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Blake GM, Fogelman I: Technical principles of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Semin Nucl Med 1997, 27:210–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Njeh CF, Boivin CM, Langton CM: The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review. Osteoporos Int 1997, 7:7–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanis JA: Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 2002, 359:1929–1936.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al: Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures.The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet 1993, 341:72–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H: Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 1996, 312:1254–1259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, et al.: Ten-year probability of osteoporotic fracture according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds. Osteoporos Int 2001, 12:989–995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD: Pre-existing fractures in bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. Ann Intern Med 1991, 114:914–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    National Osteoporosis Foundation: Physician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Washington, DC: NOF, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hodgson SF, Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, et al.: American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2001 Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Prevention and Management of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Endocr Pract 2001, 7:293–312.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gallagher JC, Ettinger B, Gass MLS, et al: Management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: Position statement of the North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2002, 9:84–101.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kanis JA, Gluer C-C: An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Osteoporos Int 2000, 11:192–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC, et al.: Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older US adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 1997, 12:1761–1768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faulkner KG, von Stetten E, Miller P: Discordance in patient classification using T-scores. J Clin Densitom 1999,2:343–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hamdy RC, Petak SM, Lenchik L: Which central dual x-ray absorptiometry skeletal sites and regions of interest should be used to determine the diagnosis of osteoporosis? J Clin Densitom 2002, 5(3S):S11–S18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Laet CE, Van Hout BA, Burger H, et al: Hip fracture in elderly men and women: validation in the Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res 1998, 13:1587–1593.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Binkley NC, Schmeer P, Wasnich RD, Lenchik L: What are the criteria by which a densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in males and non-Caucasians? J Clin Densitom 2002, 5(3S):S19–S28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gluer C-C: Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques. J Bone Miner Res 1999, 14:1952–1962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lenchik L, Kiebzak GM, Blunt BA: What is the role of serial bone mineral density measurements in patient management? J Clin Densitom 2002, 5(3S):S29–S38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liberman UA, Weiss SR, Broil JL: Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1995, 333:1437–1443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miller PD, Njeh CF, Jankowski LG, Lenchik L: International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Panel and Scientific Advisory Committee. What are the standards by which bone mass measurement at peripheral skeletal sites should be used in the diagnosis of osteoporosis? J Clin Densitom 2002, 5(suppl):S39–S45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Watts NB: Understanding the Bone Mass Measurement Act. J Clin Densitom 1999, 2:211–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    US Preventive Services Task Force: Screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002, 137:526–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Greenspan SL, von Stetten E, Emond SK, et al.: Instant vertebral assessment: a noninvasive dual x-ray absorptiometry technique to avoid misclassification and clinical mismanagement of osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 2001, 4:373–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael R. McClung

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations