From Best Effort to Enhanced QoS

  • A. Danthine
  • O. Bonaventure


The new communication environment has brought new requirements on the qualities of service for which the present “best effort” semantics is inadequate. The response to this evolution goes through the definition of a new model of QoS for the lower layers. In the “best effort” model, when a service provider accepts a transmission with a given QoS, it does not commit itself to any duty about the way it will take account of this QoS. The “guaranteed” QoS requires resources reservation mechanisms which are not always available. We present in this paper new negotiation rules and a new semantics for the QoS. It allows a service user to express more accurately its requirements and implies for the service provider an obligation of behaviour.


Service Provider Service User Transport Service Transport Protocol Service Facility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [AHS 90]
    D.P. Anderson, R.G. Herrtwich, C. Schaefer, “SRP: A Resource Reservation Protocol for Guaranteed-Performance Communication in the Internet”, TR-90–006 International Computer Science Institute, February 1990, 26 p.Google Scholar
  2. [ATV 91]
    M.E. Anagnostou, M.E. Theologou, K.M. Vlakos, “Quality of service requirements in ATM-based B-ISDNs”, Computer Comm., Vol. 14, N° 4, May 1991, pp. 197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [BLL 92a]
    Y. Baguette, L. Leonard, G. Leduc, A. Danthine, “Belgian National Body Contribution - Four Types of Enhanced Transport Services and their LOTOS Specifications”, SC6 plenary meeting, San Diego, July 8–22, 1992, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 N7323, May 1992, 58 p. (OSI95/ULg/A/22/TRJP, May 1992, SART 92/12/09).Google Scholar
  4. [BLL 92b]
    Y. Baguette, L. Leonard, G. Leduc, A. Danthine, O. Bonaventure, “OSI95 Enhanced Transport Facilities and Functions”, OSI95/Deliverable ULg-A/P, Dec.1992, 277 p. (SART 92/25/05)Google Scholar
  5. [BLL 94]
    Y. Baguette, L. Leonard, G. Leduc, A. Danthine, The OSI95 Connection-Mode Transport Service, The 0S195 Transport Service with Multimedia Support, A. Danthine, ed., Springer Verlag, pp 181–198.Google Scholar
  6. [CSZ 92]
    D.D. Clark, S. Shenker, L. Zhang, “Supporting Real-Time Applications in an Integrated Services Packet Network: Architecture and Mechanism”, SIGCOMM’92, Communications Architectures and Protocols, Baltimore, August 17–20, 1992, pp. 14–24Google Scholar
  7. [DaB 93]
    A. Danthine, O. Bonaventure, “From Best Effort to Enhanced QoS”, Deliverable R2060/ULg/CIO/DS/P/004/bl of the RACE CIO project, 51 p. (SART 93/15/15) - also circulated as ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6/WG4 N827Google Scholar
  8. [Dan 92a]
    A. Danthine, “A New Transport Protocol for the Broadband Environment”, IFIP Workshop on Broadband Communications, Estoril, January 20–22, 1992, A. Casaca, ed., Elsevier (North-Holland), 1992, pp. 337–360.Google Scholar
  9. [Dan 92b]
    A. Danthine, “Esprit Project 0SI95–New Transport Services for High-Speed Networking”, 3rd Joint European Networking Conference, Innsbruck, May 11–14 1992, also in: Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 25 (4–5), Elsevier Science Publishers ( North-Holland ), Amsterdam, November 1992, pp. 384–399.Google Scholar
  10. [Dan 94]
    A. Danthine, “The Networking Environment of the Nineties and the Need of New Standards”, The 0S195 Transport Service with Multimedia Support, A. Danthine, ed., Springer Verlag, pp 1–12.Google Scholar
  11. [DBL 92a]
    A. Danthine, Y. Baguette, G. Leduc, “Belgian National Body Contribution - Issues Surrounding the Specification of High-Speed Transport Service and Protocol”, SC6 interim meeting, Paris, February 10–13, 1992, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 N7312, January 1992 58 p.(OSI95/ULg/A/15/TR/P/V2, 46 p., January 1992, SART SART 92/04/05).Google Scholar
  12. [DBL 92b]
    A. Danthine, Y. Baguette, G. Leduc, L. Leonard, “Belgian National Body Contribution - The Enhanced Connection-Mode Transport Service of 0S195”, SC6 plenary meeting, San Diego, July 8–22, 1992, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 N7759, June 1992 16 p. (OS195, OSI95/ULg/A/24/TR/P, 16 p., June 1992, SART 92/14/05).Google Scholar
  13. [DBL 92c]
    A. Danthine, Y. Baguette, G. Leduc, L. Leonard, The 0SI95 Connection-mode Transport Service — The Enhanced QoS, IFIP Conf. on High Performance Networking, Liège, December 16–18, 1992, in: A. Danthine, O. Spaniol, eds., C14 High Performance Networking, Elsevier Science Publ. ( North-Holland ), Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 235–252.Google Scholar
  14. [DBL 93]
    A. Danthine, Y. Baguette, L. Leonard, G. Leduc, “An Enhancement of the QoS Concept”, Jan. 1993, 16 p. (OSI95/ULg/A/28/TR/P) - see also ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6/N8010Google Scholar
  15. [Dee 93]
    S. Deering, “SIP: Simple Internet Protocol”, IEEE Network Magazine, Vol. 7 No. 3 (May 1993)Google Scholar
  16. [Fer 92]
    D. Ferrari, “Real-Time Communication in an Internetwork”, Journal of High Speed Networks,Vol. 1, N° 1, 1992 pp. 79–103Google Scholar
  17. [Fra 93]
    P. Francis, “A Near-Term Architecture for Deploying Pip”, IEEE Network Magazine, Vol. 7 No. 3 (May 1993)Google Scholar
  18. [ISO 6/8010]
    “Liaison Statement to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 21 on Qualities of Service (QoS) Work”, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 N8010, 17 March 1993, 16 p.Google Scholar
  19. [ISO 8072]
    ISO/IEC JTC1, “Transport service definition for Open Systems Interconnection”, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 N7734 (ISO DIS 8072 - DIS ballot terminates on April 1993 ).Google Scholar
  20. ISO 8073] International Standard ISO/IEC 8073, “Connection oriented transport protocol specification” [Third edition, 1992–12–15]Google Scholar
  21. [ISO 8348]
    ISO/IEC JTC1, “Network Service Definition for Open Systems Interconnection”, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 N7558, 21 Sep. 1992Google Scholar
  22. [Kes 92]
    S. Keshav, “Report on the Workshop on Quality of Service Issues in High Speed Networks”, Computer Communication Review, Vol. 22, N° 5, October 1992, pp. 74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [Kur 93]
    J. Kurose, “Open Issues and Challenges in Providing Quality of Service Guarantees in High-Speed Networks”, ACM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 23, N° 1, January 1993, pp. 6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [LaP 91]
    A.A. Lazar, G. Pacifici, “Control of Resources in Broadband Networks with Quality of Service Guarantees”, IEEE Communication Magazine, Vol. 29, N° 10, October 1991, pp. 6673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [LiG 90b]
    T.D.C. Little, A. Ghafoor, “Network Considerations for Distributed Multimedia Object Composition and Communication”, IEEE Network Magazine, Vol. 4, N° 6, November 1990, pp. 32–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [Par 92]
    C. Partridge, “A proposed Flow Specification”, Network Working Group RFC 1363, Sep. 1992Google Scholar
  27. [Top 90]
    C. Topolcic, Ed., “Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)”, Network Working Group RFC 1190, Oct. 1990Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Danthine
    • 1
  • O. Bonaventure
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut d’Electricité Montefiore, B-28Université de LiègeLiegeBelgium

Personalised recommendations