Response-Adjusting Stimulus Intensity

  • Peter B. Rosenberger


The problesm of how to deal with response behavior in the “indifference range” of stimulus intensity is one of the oldest in psychophysics; it has long been recognized that such behavior is not necessarily under the control of intensity alone. Indeed, to some extent, the history of the science is the story of various theoretical approaches to this problem.


Stimulus Intensity Stimulus Control Sensory Threshold Cumulative Record Warning Stimulus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, T. W., P. J. McCarthy, and J. W. Tukey. 1946. “Staircase” methods of sensitivity testing. NAVORD Report, 65–46.Google Scholar
  2. Békésy, G. von. 1947. A new audiometer. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockholm), 35:411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blough, D. S. 1955. Method for tracing dark-adaptation in the pigeon. Science, 121:703–704.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blough, D. S. 1958. A method for obtaining psychophysical thresholds from the pigeon. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 1:31–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boren, J. J., and J. L. Malis. 1961. Determining thresholds of aversive brain stimulation. Amer. J. Physiol., 201:429–433.Google Scholar
  6. Boring, E. G. 1942. Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  7. Brownlee, K. A., J. L. Hodges, and M. Rosenblatt. 1953. The up-and-down method with small samples. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc, 48:262–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cattell, J. M. 1893. On errors of observation. Amer. J. Psychol., 5:285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornsweet, T. N. 1962. The staircase method in psychophysics. Amer. J. Psychol., 75:485–491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corso, J. F. 1956. Effects of testing methods on hearing thresholds. Arch. Otolaryng., 63:78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corso, J. F. 1963. A theoretico-historical review of the threshold concept. Psychol. Bull., 60:356–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corso, J. F. and A. Cohen. 1958. Methodological aspects of auditory threshold. measurements. J. Exp. Psychol., 55:8–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dixon, W. J., and A. M. Mood. 1948. A method for obtaining and analyzing sensitivity data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc, 43:109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fechner, G. T. 1860. Elements of Psychophysics (transl. by Helmut E. Adler) 1966, New York, Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Fields, L., and M. Glusman. 1967. ITI effects upon conditional aversiveness in titration schedules. Read at meetings of the Eastern Psychological Assoc, Boston.Google Scholar
  16. Gourevitch, G. 1965. Auditory masking in the rat. J. Acoust. Soc Amer., 37:439–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gourevitch, G. M., H. Hack, and J. E. Hawkins. 1960. Auditory thresholds in the rat measured by an operant technique. Science, 131:1046–1047.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guilford, J. P. 1954. Psychometric Methods, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  19. Kappauf, W. E. 1963. Final report on context effects in psychophysical judgements. Contract No. DA-49–007-MD-877, Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army.Google Scholar
  20. Kappauf, W. E. 1967. An empirical sampling of the up-and-down method using computergenerated series. Report No. 1 on Grant No. NB-05576–01, National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness.Google Scholar
  21. Kelly, D. D., and M. Glusman. 1968. Aversive thresholds following midbrain lesions. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 66:25–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindsley, O. R. 1957. Operant behavior during sleep. Science, 126:1290–1291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Long, L. 1937. A study of the effect of preceding stimuli upon the judgement of auditory intensities. Arch. Psychol. N.Y., No. 209.Google Scholar
  24. McDiarmid, C. G. 1962. Context effects in differential loudness judgements. Report under Contract No. DA-49–007-MD-877, Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army.Google Scholar
  25. Moore, R., and I. Goldiamond. 1964. Errorless establishment of visual discrimination using fading procedures. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 7:269–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Noell, W. K., V. S. Walker, B. S. Kang, and S. Berman. 1966. Retinal damage by light in rats. Invest. Ophthal., 5:450–473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Oldfield, R. C. 1949. Continuous recording of sensory thresholds and other psychophysical variables. Nature, 164:581.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ray, B. A. 1967. The course of acquisition of a line-tilt discrimination by rhesus monkeys. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 10:17–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Riggs, L. A., J. C. Cornsweet, and W. G. Lewis. 1957. Effects of light on electrical excitation of the human eye. Psychol. Monogr., 71:1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenberger, P. B., and J. T. Ernest. 1969. Behavioral assessment of absolute brightness thresholds in the albino rat. Vision Res., in press.Google Scholar
  31. Sidman, M. 1960. Tactics of Scientific Research, New York, Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  32. Sidman, M. 1962. An adjusting avoidance schedule. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 5:271–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sidman, M. and L. T. Stoddard. 1966. Programming perception and learning for retarded children. In Ellis, N.S., ed., International Review of Research in Mental Retardation. New York, Academic Press, Inc., vol. 2, pp. 151–208.Google Scholar
  34. Sidman, M. and P. B. Rosenberger. 1967. Several methods for teaching serial position sequences to monkeys. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 10:467–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sidman, M. and L. T. Stoddard. 1967. The effectiveness of fading in programming a simultaneous form discrimination for retarded children. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 10:3–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sidman, M. B., A. Ray, R. L. Sidman, and J. Klinger. 1966. Hearing and vision in neurological mutant mice. Exp. Neurol., 16:377–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Skinner, B. F. 1953. Science and Human Behavior. New York, The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  38. Tanner, W. P., and J. A. Swets. 1954. A decision-making theory of visual detection. Psychol. Rev., 61:401–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Terrace, H. S. 1963. Discrimination learning with and without “errors.” J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 6:1–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Titchener, E. B. 1905. Experimental Psychology, New York, The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  41. Touchette, P. E. 1968. The effects of a graduated stimulus change on the acquisition of a simple discrimination in severely retarded boys. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 11:39–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Urban, F. M. 1907. On the method of just perceptible differences. Psychol. Rev., 14:244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weiss, B. 1969. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  44. Weiss, B. and V. G. Laties. 1958. Fractional escape and avoidance on a titration schedule. Science, 128:1575–1576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weiss, B. and V. G. Laties. 1959. Titration behavior on various fractional escape programs. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 2:227–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weiss, B. and V. G. Laties. 1963. Characteristics of aversive thresholds measured by a titration schedule. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 6:563–572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weitzman, E., G. S. Ross, W. Hodos, and R. Galambos. 1960. Behavioral method for study of pain in the monkey. Science, 133:37–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter B. Rosenberger
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Neuropsychiatry, Walter Reed Army Institute of ResearchWalter Reed Army Medical CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations