Skip to main content

Abstract

Sensory systems in humans have been investigated by means of psychophysical methods. These methods define the rules for systematic presentation of stimuli to the subject and for the analysis of the subject’s responses from which various characteristics of the particular sensory system can be abstracted. Human psychophysical experiments rely heavily on language for instruction of the subject in his task and for his cooperation throughout the study. A crucial difference between human and animal psychophysics is the absence of language in animals. Thus, a systematic investigation of sensory characteristics in animals requires application of techniques which evolved not only from psychophysics, but also from another branch of psychology, namely, conditioning. In order to instruct animals in their task in a psychophysical experiment and maintain their behavior during these experiments, conditioning techniques have been required. Both classical and instrumental conditioning techniques have supplied appropriate precedures, although instrumental conditioning has been the more prevalent source of these techniques.

The experimentation on monkeys was carried out when the author was on a Special Fellowship from the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness, at the Auditory Research Laboratories, Princeton University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ash, P. 1951. The sensory capacities of infrahuman mammals: vision, audition, gustation. Psychol. Bull., 48:289–326.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, S., E. Luschei, M. Nathan, and C. Saslow. 1966. A training technique for the daily chairing of monkeys. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 9:680.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behar, I., J. N. Cronholm, and M. Loeb. 1965. Auditory sensitivity of the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 59:426–428.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Békésy, G. von. 1947. A new audiometer. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockholm), 35:411–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Békésy, G. von and W. A. Rosenblith. 1951. The mechanical properties of the ear. In S. S. Stevens, ed. Handbook of Experimental Psychology, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 1075–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, C. I. 1963. Hearing in mice via GSR audiometry. J. Speech Hearing Res., 6:359–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, H. R., and H. Schlosberg. 1943. Octave generalization, pitch discrimination, and loudness thresholds in the white rat. J. Exp. Psychol., 33:407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, C. E., and E. de Boer. 1966. Masking and discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 39:708–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clack, T. D., and J. D. Harris. 1963. Auditory thresholds in the rat by a two-lever technique. J. Aud. Res., 3:53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clack, T. D., and J. D. Harris and P. N. Herman. 1963. A single-lever psychophysical adjustment procedure for measuring auditory thresholds in the monkey. J. Aud. Res., 3:175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowies, J. T., and L. A. Pennington. 1943. An improved technique for determining auditory acuity of the rat. J. Psychol., 15: 41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, D. E., M. C. Hepp-Reymond, D. Tabowitz, and J. Palin. 1965. Cochlear potentials in the albino rat. J. Aud. Res., 5:307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccher, W. 1942. Comparative thresholds of pitch and intensity in rat, dog and man. Paper delivered at the meetings of the Eastern Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, J. H. 1934. Auditory acuity of the chimpanzee. J. Comp. Psychol., 17:157–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldtkeller, R., and E. Zwicker. 1956. Das Ohr als Nachrichtenempfänger, Stuttgart, Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, H. 1929. Speech and Hearing, New York, D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, H. 1940. Auditory patterns. Rev. Mod. Physics, 12:47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, H. and W. A. Munson. 1937. Relation between loudness and masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 9:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, S., and D. N. Elliott. 1965. Thresholds of audition for three species of monkey. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 37:139–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J., and C. T. Morgan. 1942. Auditory sensitivity in the rat. J. Comp. Psychol., 34:321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, G. 1965. Auditory masking in the rat. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 37:439–443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, G. and B. Cole. 1963. A manipulandum for use with rats responding to auditory stimuli. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 6:413–414.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, G. and M. H. Hack. 1966. Audibility in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 62:289–291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, G. M. H. Hack, and J. E. Hawkins. 1960. Auditory thresholds in the rat measured by an operant technique. Science, 131:1046–1047.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. M. 1965. Masking with two tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 37:802–813.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. N. 1961a. Auditory masking and the critical band. J. Acoust. Soc Amer., 33:484–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. N1961b. Critical bandwidth and the frequency coordinates of the basilar membrane. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 33:1344–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hack, M. 1966. Receiver operating characteristics in the rat. J. Aud. Res., 6:229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, P. M. 1957. Noise masked thresholds as a function of tonal duration and masking noise bandwidth. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 29:506–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. D. 1943. The auditory acuity of préadolescent monkeys. J. Comp. Psychol., 35:255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. E., and S. S. Stevens. 1950. The masking of pure tones and of speech by white noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 22:6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, F. M. 1938. Audition in the white rat. III. Absolute and relative thresholds. J. Comp. Psychol., 26:45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, W. S. 1927. Further data on the auditory sensitivity of the white rat. Pedag. Sem., 34:177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, J. H. 1951. Measurement of auditory intensity thresholds in the rat by conditioning of an autonomic response. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 44:118–125.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. S. 1968. Masked tonal thresholds in the bottlenosed porpoise. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 44:965–967.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Licklider, J. C. R. 1951. Basic correlates of the auditory stimulus. In S. S. Stevens, ed. Handbook of Experimental Psychology, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 985–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D. 1964. Auditory sensitivity of the chinchilla in quiet and in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 36:2010. (Abstr.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munn, N. L. 1950. Handbook of Psychological Research on the Rat, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palin, J., and G. Gourevitch. 1970. An improved narrowband noise source. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. (In press.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, R., and W. J. M. Levelt. 1965. Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 38:548–560.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff, F., and D. S. Blough. 1954. Behavioral studies of visual processes in the pigeon. USN, ONR, Tech. Rep., Contract N5 ori-07663, Proj. NR 140–072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, T. H., R. S. Gales, C. A. Shewmaker, and P. O. Thompson. 1950. The frequency selectivity of the ear as determined by masking experiments. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 22:490–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharf, B. 1966. Critical bands: Special Report, LSC-S-3. Laboratory of Sensory Communication, Syracuse University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiden, H. R. 1958. Auditory acuity of the marmoset monkey (Hapale jacchus). Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, Univ. Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Mich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semenoff, W. A., and F. A. Young. 1964. Comparison of the auditory acuity of man and monkey. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 57:89–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, W. C. 1970. Hearing. In Schrier, A. M. and F. Stollnitz, eds. Behavior of Nonhuman Primates, New York, Academic Press, Inc., vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, W. C. S. Green, and F. L. Miller. 1966. Auditory sensitivity of the monkey. Science, 153:1646–1647.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S., and H. Davis. 1938. Hearing, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C. S. 1963. Masking of tones by noise for the cat. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 35:167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, G. R. 1934. Auditory acuity of monkeys. Comp. Psychol. Monogr., 10:1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, E., G. Flottorp, and S. S. Stevens. 1957. Critical band width in loudness summation. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 29:548–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1970 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gourevitch, G. (1970). Detectability of Tones in Quiet and in Noise by Rats and Monkeys. In: Stebbins, W.C. (eds) Animal Psychophysics: the design and conduct of sensory experiments. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4514-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4514-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4516-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4514-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics