Perception and Stimulus Generalization

  • Richard W. Malott
  • Marilyn Kay Malott


A methodologic analysis (cf., Galanter, 1962; Goldiamond, 1962; Graham, 1958) will be used in an attempt to show how sensation and perception, along with a number of other traditional topics, can be placed under the general heading of stimulus control and made compatible with an experimental analysis of behavior (Malott, 1969).


Stimulus Dimension Discrimination Training Generalization Gradient Generalization Test Subjective Equality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boakes, R. A. 1969. The bisection of a brightness interval by pigeons. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 12:201–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carter, D. J., and R. H. Pollack. 1968. The great illusion controversy: a glimpse. Percept. Motor Skills, 27:705–706.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cumming, W. W., and D. A. Eckerman. 1965. Stimulus control of a differentiated operant. Psychon. Sci., 3:313–314.Google Scholar
  4. Erlebacher, A., and R. Sekuler. 1969. An explanation of the Mueller-Lyer illusion: the confusion theory examined. J. Exp. Psychol., 80:462–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Farmer, J. 1963. Properties of behavior under random interval reinforcement schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 6:607–612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferster, C. B. 1953. The use of the free operant in the analysis of behavior. Psychol. Bull., 50:263–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galanter, E. 1962. Contemporary psychophysics. In Brown, R., Galanter, E., Hess, E. H., and Mandler, G., eds. New Directions in Psychology, New York, Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, Inc., vol. 1, pp. 87–156.Google Scholar
  8. Goldiamond, I. 1962. Perception. In Bachrach, A. J., ed. Experimental Foundations of Clinical Psychology, New York, Basic Books, Inc., pp. 280–340.Google Scholar
  9. Graham, C. 1958. Sensation and perception in an objective psychology. Psychol. Rev., 65:65–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Graham, C. and P. Ratoosh. 1962. Notes on some interrelations of sensory psychology, perception and behavior. In Koch, S., ed. Psychology: A Study of a Science, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company, vol. 4, pp. 483–514.Google Scholar
  11. Guttman, N., and H. I. Kalish. 1956. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. J. Exp. Psychol., 51:79–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herrnstein, R. J., and P. van Sommers. 1962. Method for sensory scaling with animals. Science, 135:40–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Honig, W. K., and J. Shaw. 1962. The bisection of spectral intervals by pigeons: a first attempt. Paper read at meetings of the Eastern Psychological Association, Atlantic City, N.J.Google Scholar
  14. Malott, R. W. 1969. Perception revisited. Percept. Motor Skills, 28:683–693.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malott, R. W. and W. W. Cumming. 1965. A note on multiple schedules of IRT reinforcement. Psychon. Sci., 2:259–260.Google Scholar
  16. Malott, R. W., M. K. Malott, and J. Pokrzywinski. 1967a. The effects of outward-pointing arrowheads on the Mueller-Lyer illusion in pigeons. Psychon. Sci., 9:55–56.Google Scholar
  17. Malott, R. W., M. K. Malott, and J. G. Svinicki. 1967b. Generalization of stimulus matching without the use of non-matching stimuli. Psychon. Sci., 9:21–22.Google Scholar
  18. Malott, R. W., M. K. Malott, and J. G. Svinicki. 1968. Generalization of stimulus matching outside the range of training stimuli. Paper read at meetings of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  19. Migler, B. 1964. Effects of averaging data during stimulus generalization. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 7:303–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Snow, M. E., and C. N. Uhl. 1969. Effects of time out and S+ postponement training procedures on free operant discrimination acquisition. Psychon. Sci., 14:218.Google Scholar
  21. Stebbins, W. C. 1966. Auditory reaction time and the derivation of equal loudness contours for the monkey. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 9:135–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stevens, J. C, J. D. Mack, and S. S. Stevens. 1960. Growth of sensation on seven continua as measured by force of handgrip. J. Exp. Psychol., 59:60–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stevens, S. S., and E. H. Galanter. 1957. Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. J. Exp. Psychol., 54:377–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Svinicki, J. G. 1968. Generalization of a relational discrimination. Unpublished master’s thesis, Western Michigan University.Google Scholar
  25. Terrace, H. S. 1966. Stimulus control. In Honig, W. K. ed. Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 271–344.Google Scholar
  26. Thomas, D. R., and J. Lyons. 1966. The interaction between sensory and tonic factors in the perception of the vertical in pigeons. Percept. Psychophys., 1:93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard W. Malott
  • Marilyn Kay Malott
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentWestern Michigan UniversityKalamazooUSA

Personalised recommendations