For all their popularity as pets, cats have been conspicuously neglected as experimental animals by behavioral scientists. Yet there are many advantages and even strong reasons for using the cat as a behavioral animal. He is of a convenient size, is easy to maintain, and generally speaking, has a reasonable disposition so that he can be easily handled in the laboratory. Perhaps a more important reason is that a great deal of research has been done by physiologists and anatomists on his nervous system.


Visual Discrimination Negative Stimulus Positive Stimulus Discrimination Problem Luminance Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baden, J. P., J. C. Urbaitis, and T. H. Meikle, Jr. 1965. Effects of serial bilateral neo-cortical ablations on a visual discrimination by cats. Exp. Neurol., 13:233–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkley, M. A. 1969. The discrimination of moving lines and spots by cats. Paper delivered at meetings of the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, R. A., I. T. Diamond, and W. D. Neff. 1957. Role of auditory cortex in discrimination of changes in frequency. J. Neurophysiol., 20:108–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Crawford, F. T., and D. R. Kenshalo. 1965. A liquid reinforcer for the cat. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 8:29–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guthrie, E. R., and G. P. Horton. 1946. Cats in a Puzzle Box, New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Hodos, W., A. M. Laursen, and T. Nissen. 1963. A reinforcer for cats. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 6:162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hubel, D. H., and T. N. Wiesel. 1965. Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. J. Neurophysiol., 28:229–289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kennedy, J. L., and K. U. Smith. 1935. Visual thresholds of real movement in the cat. J. Genet. Psychol., 46:470–476.Google Scholar
  9. Luschei, E. S., and C. A. Saslow. 1966. Automatic stimulus attentuator for rapid discrimination training. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 9:249–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mello, N. K. 1968. Color generalization in the cat following discrimination training on achromatic intensity and on wavelength. Vis. Res., 6:341–354.Google Scholar
  11. Mello, N. K. and N. J. Peterson. 1964. Behavioral evidence for color discrimination in the cat. J. Neurophysiol., 27:323–333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Reynolds, G. S. 1961. Attention in the pigeon. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 4:203–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sidman, M., and L. Stoddard. 1967. The effectiveness of fading in programming a simultaneous form discrimination for retarded children. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 10:3–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith, K. U. 1936. Visual discrimination in the cat: IV. The visual acuity of the cat in relation to stimulus distance. J. Genet. Psychol., 49:297–313.Google Scholar
  15. Sperry, R. W., N. Miner, and R. E. Myers. 1955. Visual pattern perception following subpial slicing and tantalum wire implantations in the visual cortex. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 48:50–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Symmes, D. 1963. Operant manipulandum for kittens. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 8:29–30.Google Scholar
  17. Terrace, H. S. 1963. Discrimination learning with and without “errors.” J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 6:1–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Warren, J. M., and A. Baron. 1956. The formation of learning sets by cats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 49:227–231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark A. Berkley
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations