An Alternative to the Ethic of Euthanasia

  • Arthur J. Dyck


Contemporary society and modern medicine face difficult policy decisions. This is illustrated most recently in the Voluntary Euthanasia Act of 1969, submitted for consideration in the British Parliament. The purpose of that act is to provide for “the administration of euthanasia to persons who request it and who are suffering from an irremediable condition” (Downing, 1971) and to enable such persons to make such a request in advance. For the purposes of that act, euthanasia means “the painless inducement of death” to be administered by a physician, i.e., “a registered medical practitioner.”


Human Dignity Human Freedom Christian Tradition Good Death Voluntary Euthanasia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, L. 1949. Medical science under dictatorship. New Engl. J. Med. 241:39–47. For a thorough study of the “edge of the wedge” argument as it applies to legalizing voluntary euthanasia, see Sissela Bok, “Voluntary Euthanasia,” unpublished Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
  2. Barrington, M. R. Apologia for suicide. In Downing, op. cit.Google Scholar
  3. Downing, A. B., ed. 1971. Euthanasia and the Right to Death. New York, Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dyck, A. J. Religious Views and U.S. Population Policy (prepared for the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future and available at the Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences, Hastings-OnHudson, N.Y.). See also Population policies and ethical acceptability. In Rapid Population Growth: Consequences and Policy Implications. Roger Revelle et al., eds. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press, 1971. See also 1972. Perplexities for the would-be-liberal in abortion, J. Rep. Med. 8(6):351–4.Google Scholar
  5. Dyck, A. J. 1965. Questions for the global conscience. Psych. Today. 2 (4): 38–42.Google Scholar
  6. Editorial. 1970. A new ethic for medicine and society. Cal. Med. 113: 67–68.Google Scholar
  7. Fletcher, G. P. Prolonging life: some legal considerations. In Downing, op. cit. Google Scholar
  8. Fletcher, J. The patient’s right to die. In Downing, op. cit. Google Scholar
  9. Genesis, Chapter 3, The Holy Bible. 1952. Revised Standard Version. New York, Thomas Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Jakobovits, I. 1967. Jewish Medical Ethics. New York, Bloch Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  11. Kamisar, Y. Euthanasia legislation: some non-religious objections. In Downing, op. cit. Google Scholar
  12. Lasagna, L. 1970. The prognosis of death. In The Dying Patient. O. G. Brim et al., eds. New York, Russell Sage Foundation. Pages 80–81.Google Scholar
  13. Mendenhall, G. E. 1955. Law and Covenant in Israel and the Ancient Near East. Pittsburgh, Biblical Colloquium.Google Scholar
  14. Morison, R. S. 1971. Chairman’s introduction. In Early Diagnosis of Human Genetic Defects. M. Harris, ed. H. E. W. Publication No. ( NIH ) 72–25. Page 9.Google Scholar
  15. Niebuhr, H. R. 1963. The Responsible Self. New York, Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  16. Ramsey, P. 1970. The Patient as a Person. New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Clarendon, Oxford University Press. (See pp. 19–21 for an explanation and a list of prima facie duties.)Google Scholar
  18. Smith, H. L. 1970. Ethics and the New Medicine. New York, Abingdon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Tillich, P. 1952. The Courage To Be. New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur J. Dyck

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations