Genetic Engineering: Present and Future

  • Gilbert S. Omenn


Basic understanding of genes and processes of reproduction has advanced rapidly in recent years and generated speculation about the potential manipulation of human genes and human reproduction. Both enthusiasts who seek to eliminate certain diseases or undesirable traits and doomsday soothsayers who predict political-social control of the right to have children and of the determination of which traits are desirable are writing in lay magazines. Scientists are motivated to understand the processes involved and to develop useful therapies for human disorders. Nevertheless, social and political philosophy may become important forces in the application of such knowledge, just as Einstein’s “pure” formulation of the relationship between energy and mass led eventually to its application in atomic bombs. The potential bombshells of what is sometimes called “the biological revolution” include direct alteration of human physical or mental characteristics by “treatment” with genes and fertilization of human eggs in the test tube. We will discuss several current practices and certain futuristic possibilities, in the context of present knowledge and foreseeable developments in human genetics.


Genetic Counseling Genetic Engineer Artificial Insemination Amniotic Fluid Cell Selective Abortion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Edwards, R. G. 1971. Problems of artificial fertilization. Nature. 233: 23–25 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fleming, D. 1969. On living in a biological revolution. The Atlantic Monthly 223 (2): 64–69.Google Scholar
  3. Friedmann, T., and R. Roblin. 1972. Gene therapy for human genetic disease? Science. 175: 949–955.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kass, L. R. 1971. Babies by means of in vitro fertilization: unethical experiments on the unborn? New Engl. J. Med. 285: 1174–1179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lederberg, J. 1971. Genetic engineering, or the amelioration of genetic defect. The Pharos 34: 9–12.Google Scholar
  6. Milunsky, A., J. W. Littlefield, J. N. Kanfer, E. H. Kolodny, V. E. Shih, and L. Atkins. 1970. Prenatal genetic diagnosis. New Engl. J. Med. 283:1370–1381, 1441–1447, 1498–1504.Google Scholar
  7. Motulsky, A. G., G. R. Fraser, and J. Felsenstein. 1971. Public health and long-term genetic implications of intrauterine diagnosis and selective abortion. In Symposium on Intrauterine Diagnosis. D. Bergsma and A. G. Motulsky, eds. Birth Defects Original Article Series 7: 22–32.Google Scholar
  8. Omenn, G. S., and A. G. Motulsky. 1972. Intra-uterine diagnosis and genetic counseling: implications for psychiatry in the future. In American Handbook of Psychiatry, vol. 6, 3rd ed. D. A. Hamburg and H. K. H. Brodie, eds. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Time Magazine Cover Story: The Promise and Peril of the New Genetics. April 19, 1971.Google Scholar
  10. Torrey, E. F. 1968. Ethical Issues in Medicine. Boston, Little Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  11. Watson, J. D. 1970. Molecular Biology of the Gene. 2nd ed. New York, W. A. Benjamin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilbert S. Omenn

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations