Training

  • Eleanor Callahan Hunt
  • Sara Breckenridge Sproat
  • Rebecca Rutherford Kitzmiller
Part of the Health Informatics Series book series (HI)

Abstract

Training is the chance to market to all of the users on the benefits of the system. It is a chance to do a tremendous sales pitch to the organization at large, building on the momentum of the team’s successful communication techniques. It is also the opportunity to teach how to maximize system use and infect the students with the trainers’ enthusiasm. Is everyone going to like it? No, there are some that may never adapt and would rather retire than use a technological system.2 Many will prove easy to recruit when first exposed to the system during training. Training is often the first time that end users are exposed to the system; making a great first impression during initial training improves adoption success. These sessions are also a time for the users to try to integrate the system into their workflow. Providing training materials that make sense to individual user groups and developing a relationship with the trainer promotes confidence that the system will work when implemented.3 To accomplish this, the trainers, analysts, and other project staff need to have good working relationships and communication patterns. For example, when users have potential usability, functionality, or other learning problems, the trainer should feel comfortable drawing the analyst in to speak with the trainee.

Keywords

Learning Style Training Method Adult Learning Cost Containment Training Material 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alpay L, Russell A. Information technology training in primary care: the nurses’ voice. Computers in Nursing 2002; 20 (4): 136–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hilz LM. The informatics nurse specialist as change agent: application of innovation-diffusion theory. Computers in Nursing 2000; 18 (6): 272–281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lacefield RS. Adult education tip sheets, Waycross College website. http://members.tripod.com/-Roberta/methods.htm#merriam (April 20, 2003 ).
  4. 4.
    Jacobs P. User training costs in medical information system implementation. Journal of Clinical Engineering 1986; 11 (3): 227–232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buch K, Bartley S. Learning style and training delivery mode preference. Journal of Workplace Learning 2002; 14 (1): 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C, Eichstadter R. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003; 10 (1): 69–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sinclair M, Gardner J. Planning for information technology key skills in nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1999;30(6):1441–1450.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tyler K. Hold onto what you’ve learned. HR Magazine 2000; 45 (5): 94–102.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herrick CA, Jenkins TB, Carlson JH. Using self-directed learning modules. A literature review. Journal of Nursing Staff Development 1998; 14 (2): 73–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Allred CA, Arford PH, Mauldin PD, Goodwin LK. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the nursing literature, 1992–1996. Image—Journal of Nursing Scholarship 1998; 30 (3): 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stroot S, Keil V, Stedman P, Lohr L, Faust R, Schincariol-Randall L, Sullivan A, Czerniak G, Kuchcinski J, Orel N, Richter M. Peer Assistance and Review Guidebook. Columbus, OH: Ohio Department of Education, 1998. Available at http://www.utoledo.edu/colleges/education/par/Adults (March 25, 2003 ).
  12. 12.
    Imel S. Teaching adults. Is it different? US Department of Education Eric Digest #82, 1989. Available at http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed305495 (March 25, 2003 ).
  13. 13.
    Imel S. Guidelines for working with adult learners. US Department of Education Eric Digest #154, 1994. Available at http://www.ed.gov/databases/ ERIC_Digests/ed377313 (March 25, 2003).
  14. 14.
    Tharp GD. The relationship between personality type and achievement in an undergraduate physiology course. Journal of American Physiology 1992; 262 (6, Pt. 3): S1 - S3.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Atack L, Rankin J. A descriptive study of registered nurses’ experiences with web-based learning. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2002; 40 (4): 457–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hlusko D, Pahoulis E, Branson L. Cut training costs with computer-based tutorials. Nursing Management 1998; 29 (11): 31–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Phelps SL. Off to a successful start: the use of self-study for hospital-wide nursing orientation. Journal of Nursing Staff Development 1996; 12 (1): 7–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herrick CA, Jenkins TB, Carlson JH, Joy H. Using self-directed Learning modules: a literature review. Journal of Nursing Staff Development 1998; 14 (2): 73–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thompson C, Crutchlow E. Learning style research: a critical review of the literature and implications for nursing education. Journal of Professional Nursing 1993; 9 (1): 34–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Worthington RC, Clay MC. Learner specific continuing education and the Myers-briggs type inventory. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 1995; 15 (2): 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brazen L, Roth R. Using learning style preferences for perioperative clinical education. Association of Perioperative Registered nurses journal 1995; 61 (1): 89–195.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Summers AN, Rinehart GC, Simpson D, Redlich PN. Acquisition of surgical skills: a randomized trail of didactic, video tape and computer based training. Surgery 1999; 126 (2): 330–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cavanagh SJ, Coffin DA. Matching instructional preference and teaching styles: a review of the literature. Nurse Education Today 1994; 14: 106–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Griggs D, Griggs SA, Dunn R, Ingham J. Accommodating nursing students diverse learning styles. Nurse Educator 1994; 19 (6): 41–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleanor Callahan Hunt
    • 1
  • Sara Breckenridge Sproat
    • 2
  • Rebecca Rutherford Kitzmiller
    • 3
  1. 1.Informatics ConsultantRaleighUSA
  2. 2.67th Combat Support Hospital, UnitWuerzburgGermany
  3. 3.Duke University Health SystemDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations