Abstract
In the avian (Manley, 1979; Manley and Gleich, 1984; Manley et al., 1985; Temchin, 1988) and reptilian (Crawford and Fettiplace, 1980; Eatock et aI., 1981) auditory nerves there exists a population of afferent fibres which exhibit quasiperiodic spontaneous activity. The interval histogram of such activity shows decaying maxima, separated at approximately equal intervals, named the preferred interval by Manley (1979). These histograms contrast with those reported for other species (e.g. Kiang, 1965; Walsh et al., 1972; Robertson and Manley, 1974), and with the balance of histograms from other fibres in birds and reptiles, where after an absolute refractory period the interval histogram decays exponentially from it’s modal value, as if generated by a truncated, homogeneous Poisson process. However, for quasiperiodic spontaneous activity both the modal interval and the preferred interval are related to the characteristic frequency (CF) of the neurone. Earlier reports (Manley, 1979; Crawford and Fettiplace, 1980; Eatock et al., 1981), as well as the one by Temchin(1988), report that the modal and preferred intervals are approximately equal to the CF-period, whereas the more recent papers from Manley and coworkers (Manley and Gleich, 1984; Manley et al., 1985) maintain that these intervals are on average 15% longer than the CF-period. In these papers Manley estimated the preferred interval as the weighted average of the intervals of the second and higher maxima of the interval histogram, whereas Temchin(1988) calculated it from the number of minima in a specified time frame of the autocorrelation histogram.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A. (1965) Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, New York.
Bailey, N.T J. (1967) The elements of Stochastic Processes. 1. Wiley, New York.
Bi, Q., Brown, J.L. Jr. and Lachs, G. (1988) Statistical expectation of the interval histograms from marginal time statistics of the Poisson process. J. Acousl. Soc. Am. 83, 1186–1189.
Cox, D.R and Miller, H.D. (1968) The Theory of Stochastic Processes. Methuen, London.
Crawford, A.C. and Fettiplace, R (1980) The frequency selectivity of auditory nerve fibres and hair cells in the cochlea of the turtle. J. Physiol. 306, 79 - 115.
Eatock, R.A., Manley, G.A. and Pawson, L. (1981) Auditory nerve fibre activity in the Tokay Gecko. I. Implications for cochlear processing. J. Comp. Physiol. 142, 203–218.
Flock, A. and Russell, I. (1976) Inhibition by efferent nerve fibres: Action on hair cells and afferent synaptic transmission in the lateral line canal organ of the burbot LoUllota. J. Physiol. 157, 45–62.
Gummer, A.W., Smolders, J.W.T. and Klinke, R. (1987) Basilar membrane motion in the pigeon measured with the Moessbauer technique. Hear. Res. 29, 63–92.
Hill, K.G., Stange, G., Gummer, AW. and Mo, J. (1989) A model proposing synaptic and extra-synaptic influences on the responses of cochlear nerve fibres. Hear. Res. 39, 75–90.
Johannesma, P.I.M. (1969) Diffusion models for the stochastic activity of neurons. In: Neural Networks (Ed: Caianiello, E.R) Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 116 - 144.
Johnson, D.H. (1974) The Response of Single Auditory-Nerve Fibers in the Cat to Single Tones: SynChrony and Average Discharge Rate. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Kiang, N.Y.-S. (1965) Discharge Patterns of single fibers in the cat’s auditory nerve. M. I. T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Manley, G.A. (1979) Preferred intervals in the spontaneous activity of primary auditory neurons. Naturwissen. 66, 582 - 584.
Manley, G.A. and Gleich, O. (1984) Avian primary auditory neurons. Naturwissen. 71, 592 - 594.
Manley, G.A., Gleich, O., Leppelsack, H.-J. and Oeckinghaus, H. (1985) Activity patterns of cochlear ganglion neurones in the starling. J. Comp. Physiol. A 157, 161-181.
Robertson, D. and Manley, G.A. (1974) Manipulation of frequency analysis in the cochlear ganglion of the guinea pig. J. Comp. Physiol. 91, 363–375.
Siebert, W.M. (1970) Frequency discrimination in the auditory system: place or periodicity mechanisms? Proc. IEEE 58, 723 - 730.
Stein, R.B. (1965) A theoretical analysis of neuronal variability. Biophys. J. 5, 173-194.
Synder, D.L. (1975). Random Point Processes. J. Wiley, New York.
Temchin, A.N. (1988) Unusual discharge patterns of single fibers in the pigeon’s auditory nerve. J. Comp. Physiol. A 163, 99-115.
Walsh, B.T., Miller, J.B., Gacek, RR and Kiang, N.Y.-S. (1972) Spontaneous activity in the eighth cranial nerve of the cat. Intern. J. Neurosci. 3, 221–236.
Wilbur, W J. and Rinzel, J. (1982) An analysis of Stein’s model for stochastic neuronal excitation. BioI. Cybern. 45, 107–114.
Wolberg, J.R (1967) Prediction Analysis. D. van Nostrand, New Jersey.
Gleich, O. (1988). Doctoral Thesis, Department of Zoology, Technical University, Munich.
Narins, P.M., Gleich, O. (1986). Phase response of low-frequency cochlear ganglion cells in the starling. In: Auditory Frequency Selectivity (Ed: Moore, B.C.J., and Patterson, R.D.) Plenum Pub. Co., pp. 209 - 216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gummer, A.W. (1990). Spontaneous Activity of Auditory Afferent Neurones in the Spiral Ganglion of the Pigeon. In: Dallos, P., Geisler, C.D., Matthews, J.W., Ruggero, M.A., Steele, C.R. (eds) The Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol 87. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4341-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4341-8_15
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97473-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4341-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive