The Ethics of Computing?

  • Herbert Burkert


WHEN change produces uncertainty or reinforces existing uncertainties, and if this change affects social values, one resort seems to be to rely on norms of behavior. The discussion of ethical questions is a gratifying one: everybody can participate; we are all experts. And yet, at the same time many share the feeling that such discussions are futile and unrewarding. There will always be a difference between what ought to be done and what actually is done. Preferences of values may either be so general that everybody can agree or, if they differ at a sufficient level of precision, where is the legitimacy for authoritative judgments?


Business Ethic Moral Issue Ethical Question Legal Norm Ethical Debate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Ames, H.E. [1983]. Groping for Ethics in Journalism. Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Anders, G. [1981]. Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen. Zweiter Band.öber die Zerstörung des Lebens im Zeitalter der dritten industriellen Revolution. München.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Apel, KO. [1984]. “Die Situation des Menschen als Herausforderung an die praktische Vernunft”. In: Praktische Philosophie/Ethik. Dialoge. Vol. I, Frankfurt, 49–70.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Arbib, M.A. [1972]. The Metaphorical Brain. New York.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bacon, F., [1620], Novum Organum.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Bamme, A., Feuerstein, G., Holling, E., Kahle, R., Kempin, P. [ 1983 ]. “Die Maschine, das sind wir selbst: zur Grundlegung einer Sozialpsychologie der Technik”. In: Psychosozial, 18, 30–50.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Barry, V. [1979]. Moral Issues in Business. Belmont.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    British Computer Society: “Code of Conduct”. [1970] In: The Computer Bulletin,March.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Becker, J.B. [ 1984 ]. “Conscience in computing: a perspective on computer crime”. In: Information Age, vol. 6, no. 3, 154–158.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Bequai, A. [ 1984 ]. “Lack of ethics as a course of computer crime”. In: Computer and People, May/June, 7–24.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Blatter, G.L., Rose, G. [ 1984 ]. “Hacking”. What should be done ? NECC’84, 6th Annual National Educational Computing Conference, June 13–15, 310–314.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Boden, M.A. [1977]. Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man. New York.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Bok, S. [1978]. Lying. Moral Choice in Public and Private life. New York.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Bok, S. [1982]. Secrets. On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation. New York.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Born, M. [1983]. “Die Zerstörung der Ethik durch die Naturwissenschaft. ” In: Vorgänge, 22, No. 61,1–5 (reprint of a paper from 1969 ).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Bowie, N. [1982]. Business ethics. Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Bühl, W. [1983]. Die Angst des Menschen vor der Technik. Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Burkert, H. [ 1986 ]. “Die Ethik der Informationsverarbeitung”. In: Schulz, A. ed. Die Zukunft der Informationssysteme. Lehren der 80er Jahre. Berlin, 654669.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Burkert, H. [ 1987 ]. A Functional Approach to the Legal Rules Governing Secrecy and Openness. Strasbourg. Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Bynum, T.W. [1985]. ed. “Computers & Ethics”, Special Issue of Metaphilosophy Vol. 16 No. 4.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Christians, C.E., Rotzoll, K.B., Fackler, M. [1983]. Media Ethics. Cases and Moral Reasoning. New York.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    De George, R.T. [1982]. Business Ethics. New York.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Diemer, A., Frenzel, I. [1982]. eds. Philosophie. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Donaldson, T. [1982]. Corporations and Morality. Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Donaldson, T. [1984]. Case Studies in Business Ethics. Englewwood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Dreyfus H.L. [1972]. What Computers Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. New York.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Flugel, J.C. [1962]. Man Morals and Society. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Folliet, J. [1969]. L’information moderne et le droit à l’information. Paris.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Gawthorp, L.C. [1984]. Public sector management systems and ethics.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Hermann, A. [1984]. Wie die Wissenschaft ihre Unschuld verlor. Macht und Missbrauch der Forscher. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Johnson, D.G. [1985]. Computer ethics. New York.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Johnson, D.G., Snapper, J.W. [1985]. eds. Ethical Issues in the Use of Computers.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Jonas, H. [1985]. Die Ethik der Verantwortung. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Lee, J.A., Segal, G., Steier, R. [ 1986 ]. “Positive alternatives: A report of an ACM panel on hacking”. In: Communications of the ACM, April, Vol. 29, No. 4, 297–299.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Lenk, H. [ 1981 ]. “Verantwortung und technische Macht”. In: Ropohl, G. ed. Interdisziplinäre Technikforschung. Berlin, 99–109.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Lewis, C.S. [ 1947 ]. “The abolition of man”. Reprinted in: Mitcham, C., Mackey, R. [1983]. eds. Philosophy and technology. New York, 143.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Luhmann, N. [ 1981 ]. “Funktion der Moral”. In: Höffe, O., Kadelbach, G., Plumpe, G. eds. Praktische Philosophie/Ethik. Reader. Vol. 2. Frankfurt, 136–151.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Maier, H. [1985]. ed. Ethik der Kommunikation. Fribourg.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    McCarthy, J. [ 1985 ]. “Ascribing mental qualities to machines”. In: Ringle, M. ed. Philosophical perspectives of artificial intelligence. New York, 61.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Mitcham, C., Huning, A. [1986]. eds. Philosophy and Technology II. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Mitcham, C., Mackey, R. [1972] eds. Philosophy and Technology I. New York, 109–202.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Mowshowitz, A. [1976]. Conquest of Will: Information Processing in Human Affairs, Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Mowshowitz, A. [ 1981 ]. “On Approaches to the Study of Social Issues in Computing”. In: Communications of the ACM, 24, 146–155.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    Mowshowitz, A. [ 1982 ]. “The bias of computer technology”. In: Hoffman, W.M., Moore, J.M. eds. Ethics and the Management of Computer Technology. Cambridge MA 1, 28–48.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    Mowshowitz, A. [ 1985 ]. “Computers and the myth of neutrality”. In: Proceedings of the 1984 ACM Computer Science Conference. New York, 85–92.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Mowshowitz, A. [1985a]. “On the social relations of computers”. In:Human Systems Management, 5, 99–110.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Mowshowitz, A. [ 1986 ]. “Ethical dimensions of information technology in global business”. In: Hoffman, W.M., et al. eds. Lanham, MA: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Mowshowitz, A. [1986a]. “Social Dimensions of Office Automation. In: Advances in Computers, Vol. 25, New York, 335–404.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    National Conference on Business Ethics. [1982]. Ethics and the Management of Computer Technology. West Germany.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    Parker, D.B. [1968]. “Rules of ethics in information processing”. In: Communications of the ACM 11, 198–201. Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    Parker, D.B. [1981]. Ethical Conflicts in Computer Science and Technology. AFIPS Press, Arlington. Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    Parker, D.B. [1981a]. Ethical Conflicts in Computer Science and Technology. Workbook. AFIPS Press, Arlington.Google Scholar
  53. [53]
    Parker, D.B. [1982]. “Ethical Dilemmas in Computer Technology”. In: National Conference, 49–56.Google Scholar
  54. [54]
    Pieper, A. [1985]. Ethik und Moral. Eine Einführung in die praktische Philosophie. München.Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    Rampacher, H. [ 1985 ]. “Der Informatiker gefordert als Fachmann und Staatsbürger”. In: Computerwoche, 12. April.Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    Rampacher, H. [ 1986 ]. “Ein Verhaltenscodex für Informatiker? Zur Ethik und verantwortung in den angewandten Wissenschaften”. In: Schulz, A. ed. Die Zukunft der Informationssysteme. Lehren der 80er Jahre. Berlin, 620ff.Google Scholar
  57. [57]
    Rivers, W.L., Schramm, W., Christians, C. [1980]. Responsibility in Mass Communication. 3rd ed., New York.Google Scholar
  58. [58]
    Salomon, R.C., Hansen, K.R. [1983]. Above the Bottom Line: An Introduction to Business Ethics. New York.Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    Sayre, K.M. [1985]. Recognition: A study in the Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  60. [60]
    Schönwandt, A. [1986]. Denkfallen beim Planen. Hamburg.Google Scholar
  61. [61]
    Sievers, B. [1974]. Geheimnis und Geheimhaltung in sozialen Systemen. Opladen.Google Scholar
  62. [62]
    Simmel, G. [1905]. “The Sociology of Secrecy and of the Secret Societies”. In: American Journal of Sociology, 11, 441–498.Google Scholar
  63. [63]
    Simon, H. [1969]. The Science of the Artificial.Google Scholar
  64. [64]
    Steinmann, H., Oppenrieder, B. [1985]. “Brauchen wir eine Unternehmensethik?” In: Die Betriebswirtschaft, 45, 170–183.Google Scholar
  65. [65]
    Thompson, D.F. [1985]. “The Possibility of Administrative Ethics”. In: Public Administration Review, 551–561.Google Scholar
  66. [66]
    Troy, N. [ 1983 ]. “Computergerechte oder menschengerechte Lösungen: Psychologische Probleme der Büroautomation”. In: Psychosozial, 18, 51–69.Google Scholar
  67. [67]
    Turkle, S. [1984]. The Second Self. Computer and the Human Spirit. New York.Google Scholar
  68. [68]
    Van der Meiden, A. [1980]. Ethics and Mass Communication. Utrecht.Google Scholar
  69. [69]
    Velasquez, M.G. [1982]. Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  70. [70]
    Volpert, W. [ 1983 ]. “Denkmaschinen und Maschinendenken: Computer programmieren Menschen”. In: Psychosozial, 18, 10–29.Google Scholar
  71. [71]
    Weizenbaum, J. [1976]. Computer Power and Human Reason. From Judgment to Calculation. New York.Google Scholar
  72. [72]
    Wiener, N. [1950]. The Human Use of Human Beings: The Cybernetics of Society. New York.Google Scholar
  73. [73]
    Wiener, N. [1971]. Ich und die Kybernetik. München.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herbert Burkert

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations