Rhinoplasty pp 279-350 | Cite as

Primary Rhinoplasty

  • Rollin K. Daniel


Primary rhinoplasty is the most difficult of aesthetic operations for three reasons: 1) nasal anatomy is highly variable thereby precluding a “one operation fits all” approach; 2) the procedure must correct both form and function; and 3) the final highly visible result must meet the patient’s high expectations. Currently, we are fortunate to be able to reap the benefits of the rhinoplasty revolution that have occurred in the previous decade. Four major advances appear to have come from this period. First, a clear set of aesthetic goals has evolved allowing formulation of an individualized operative plan for each patient rather than the specific surgeon s signature nose. Second, functional surgery for both correction and preservation of the airway has become an integral part of cosmetic procedures thereby minimizing the incidence of postoperative nasal obstruction. Third, the open approach has shortened the learning curve for the less-experienced surgeon and offered solutions for many of the problem noses that plagued the endonasal era. Fourth, a graded sequence allows the surgeon to select the appropriate maneuver to fit the severity of the patient’s deformity. We are truly at a wonderful moment in the ever-changing evolution of rhinoplasty with current questions being tip sutures vs. tip grafts, the search for an ideal alloplastic graft, and increasing precision with computer-driven medical devices.

In Part I of this chapter and on the enclosed DVD, I will present a step-by-step approach to a primary aesthetic rhinoplasty case (see DVD) . The emphasis will be on the basic techniques that every new surgeon should master during residency. In Part II of this chapter, I will review each step in the operative sequence with emphasis on which techniques I actually utilize on a routine basis. This information was gleaned from a review of 100 consecutive cosmetic primary rhinoplasties. Excluded from this group were ethnic, cleft, and traumatic cases as well as those with function as the primary goal. The results of this review were rather startling to me and may prove surprising to the reader.


Alar Base Alar Cartilage Spreader Graft Anterior Nasal Spine Open Rhinoplasty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anderson JR. The future of open rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 1988;5:189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson JR. Rhinoplasty: Emphasizing the External Approach. New York: Thieme-Stratton, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson JR, Johnson CM, and Adamson JR. Open rhinoplasty: An assessment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1982;90:272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burgess LPA, Everton DM, Quilligan JJ, et al. Complications of the external (combination) rhinoplasty approach. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986; 112:1064PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burgess LP, Quillagan JJ, Van Sant TE Jr., et al. The external (combination) rhinoplasty approach for the problem nose. J Otolaryngol 1985;14:113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Conrad K. Correction of the crooked nose by external rhinoplasty. J Otolaryngol 1978;7:32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daniel RK. External rhinoplasty—A 7% solution. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, Los Angeles. October 7–12, 1983.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty: Creating an aesthetic tip. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;80:775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daniel RK. The nasal tip: Anatomy and aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daniel RK. Open rhinoplasty: Operative techniques. In: Daniel RK (ed) Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Rhinoplasty. Boston: Little, Brown, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daniel RK. Secondary rhinoplasty following open rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;96:1539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freidman GD, and Gruber RP. A fresh look at the open rhinoplasty technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;82:973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goodman WS. External approach to rhinoplasty. Can J Otolaryngol 1973;2:207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goodman WS, and Charles DA. Why external rhinoplasty? J Otolaryngol 1978;7:9. (Entire Issue)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gorney M. Patient selection in rhinoplasty: Practical guidelines. In: Daniel RK (ed) Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Rhinoplasty. Boston: Little, Brown, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gruber RP. Open rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 1988;15:95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gunter JP, and Rohrich RJ. External approach for secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;80:161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guyuron B. Dynamic interplays during rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 1966;23:223. (Entire Issue)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johnson C, and Toriumi DM. Open Structure Rhinoplasty, Philadelphia: Saunders, 1990.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jugo SB. Complications of external rhinoplasty (abstract). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1984;92(suppl):85.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jugo SB. Total septal reconstruction through decartication (external) approach in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kridel RWH, Appling WD, and Wright WK. Septal perforation closure utilizing the external septorhinoplasty approach. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986; 112:168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kridel RWH, and Szacitowicz EH. Noncaucasian rhinoplasty with the open approach. Facial Pkst Surg 1988;5:179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Padovan IF. External approach in rhinoplasty. Surg Orl Lung 1966;3:354.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Padovan IF. Combination of extranasal and intranasal approach in surgery of the nasal pyramid and nasal septum. Can] Otolaryngol 1975;4:522.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rethi A. Right and wrong in rhinoplastic operations. Plast Reconstr Surg 1948;3:361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rethi A. Raccourcissement du nez trop long. Rev Chir Plast 1934;4:85.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Regnault P, and Daniel RK. Septorhinoplasty. In: Regnault P and Daniel RK (eds) Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Boston: Little, Brown, 1984.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rohrich R, Gunter JP, and Friedman RM. Nasal tip blood supply: An anatomic study validating the safety of the transcolumellar incision in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;95:795.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 29a.
    Rohrich R, Gunter JP, and Friedman RM. Nasal tip blood supply: An anatomic study validating the safety of the transcolumellar incision in rhinoplasty. Updated, Pkst Reconstr Surg 2000; 106:1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 30.
    Sercer A. Dekartikation der nase. Chir Maxillofac Plast 1958; 1:149.Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    Sheen JH, and Sheen AP. Aesthetic Rhinoplasty (2nd ed.) St. Louis: Mosby, 1987.Google Scholar
  33. 32.
    Tardy JW. External rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 1980;90:1626.Google Scholar
  34. 33.
    Tebbetts JB. Open rhinoplasty: more than an incisional approach. In: Daniel RK (ed) Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Rhinoplasty, Boston: Little, Brown, 1993.Google Scholar
  35. 34.
    Tebbetts JB. Rethinking the logic and techniques of primary tip rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 1996;23:245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 35.
    Toriumi DM. Open rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin 1993;1:1. (Entire Issue)Google Scholar
  37. 36.
    Toriumi DM, et al. Vascular anatomy of the nose and the external rhinoplasty approach. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122:24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 37.
    Voight T. Tip rhinoplastic operations using a transverse columellar incision. Aesthetic Pkst Surg 1983;7:13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 38.
    Vuyk HD, and Olde Kalter P. Open septorhinoplasty: Experiences in 200 patients. Rhinology 1993;3:175.Google Scholar
  40. 39.
    Wright WK, and Kridel RWH. External septorhinoplasty: A tool for teaching and improved results. Laryngoscope 1981;91:945.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rollin K. Daniel
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Newport BeachUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plastic SurgeryUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations