Introduction. The following comparison of the previous calculations of π performed on electronic computers shows the rapid increase in computational speeds which has taken place.
KeywordsElectronic Computer Machine Time Decimal Place Computational Speed Taylor Model
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.G. E. Felton, “Electronic computers and mathematicians,” Abbreviated Proceedings of the Oxford Mathematical Conference for Schoolteachers and Industrialists at Trinity College, Oxford, April 8–18, 1957, p. 12–17, footnote p. 12–53. This published result is correct to only 7480D, as was established by Felton in a second calculation, using formula (5), completed in 1958 but apparently unpublished. For a detailed account of calculations of ir see J. W. Wrench, Jr., “The evolution of extended decimal approximations to π,” The Mathematics Teacher, v. 53, 1960, p. 644–650.Google Scholar
- 5.This unpublished value of π to 16167D was computed on an IBM 704 system at the Commissariat a PEnergie Atomique in Paris, by means of the program of Genuys.Google Scholar
- 6.C. Stormer, “Sur l’application de la théorie des nombres entiers complexes à la solution en nombres rationnels, x 1, x 2, ..., x n, c 1, c 2 ,..., c n, k de l’éiquation c 1 arctg x 1 + c 2arctg x 2 + ... + c narctg x n = kπ/4,” Archiv for Mathematik og Naturvidenskab, v. 19,1896, p. 69.Google Scholar
- 7.C. F. Gauss, Werke, Göttingen, 1863; 2nd ed., 1876, v. 2, p. 499–502.Google Scholar
- 8.S. Ramanujan, “odular equations and approximations to p,” Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math., v. 45, 1914, p. 350–372; Collected papers of Srinivasa Ramanujan, Cambridge, 1927, p. 23–39.Google Scholar
- Note added in proof, December 1, 1961. J. M. GERARD of IBM United Kingdom Limited, who was then unaware of the computation described above, computed v to 20,000 D on the 7090 in the London Data Centre on July 31, 1961. His program used Machin’s formula, (1), and required 39 minutes running time. His result agrees with ours to that number of decimals.Google Scholar
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004