There has been a marked increase in litigations against hospitals and obstetricians in recent years. This litigation is frequently on behalf of children with cerebral palsy, malformations, or other less than optimal (expected) performance. Weinstein (1988), who has written a concise review on the topic, asserted that such litigation is principally the result of the following.
KeywordsCerebral Palsy Mural Thrombus Legal Consideration Meconium Aspiration Syndrome Single Umbilical Artery
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Altshuler, G., and Herman, A.: The medicolegal imperative: placental pathology and epidemiology. In, Fetal and Neonatal Brain Injury: Mechanisms, Management and the Risk of Malpractice. D.K. Stevenson, and P. Sunshine, eds., pp. 250–263. B.C. Decker, 1989.Google Scholar
- Anonymous: Cerebral palsy, intrapartum care, and a shot in the foot. Lancet 2:1251–1252, 1989.Google Scholar
- Driscoll, S.G.: Pathology and the developing fetus. Pedi-atr. Clin. North Am. 12:493–514, 1965.Google Scholar
- Durant, R.H., and Woodward, C.: Antenatal hypoxia and IQ values. Am. J. Dis. Child. 141:1150–1151, 1987.Google Scholar
- Fleischer, L.D.: Wrongful births: when is there liability for prenatal injury? Am. J. Dis. Child. 141:1260–1265, 1987.Google Scholar
- Harkavy, K.L.: Antenatal hypoxia and IQ values. Am. J. Dis. Child. 141:1150, 1987.Google Scholar