Skip to main content

Operations to Replace or Bypass the Esophagus: Colon or Jejunum Interposition; Gastric Pull-Up

  • Chapter
Operative Strategy in General Surgery
  • 236 Accesses

Abstract

Using the colon (or jejunum) to replace resected segments of the esophagus permits the surgeon to preserve intact a functioning stomach. Performing the cologastric anastomosis 8–9 cm down from the gastric cardia will generally minimize gastrocolic reflux. Achieving a sufficient length of viable colon is, with rare exceptions, a relatively simple task. One drawback to using the colon as a substitute esophagus is the risk of impairing the venous blood flow either by injuring the veins in the colon mesentery or impairing venous return by leaving an inadequate aperture in the diaphragm or at the apex of the thorax for the colon and its mesentery. Under these conditions venous infarction can occur. Following careful surgery, this complication should be quite rare. Belsey experienced one colon infarct in 92 left colon interposition operations. This complication appears to be more common when the right colon is used as opposed to the left colon (Wilkins). When performed for benign disease, the left colon interposition is a safe operation. Belsey reported a 4.3% mortality, but no anastomotic leaks. Skinner, in discussing a paper by Mansour, Hansen, Hersh, Miller, and others, stated that they had had no hospital deaths in 40 consecutive operations for colon interposition after the resection of non-dilatable benign strictures of the esophagus. Also, Skinner’s long-term functional results following the use of the left colon interposition have been good. Belsey, after following his patients for 1–6 years, reported 81% good and 17% satisfactory results. Wilkins followed a group of 21 patients for 5–24 years and reported excellent functional results. Glasgow, Cannon, and Elkins also reported good or excellent results and no operative deaths following 17 left and 1 right colon interposition operations for benign esophageal disease. These patients had been followed for 1–6.5 years. Good results following colon interposition in children were reported by Kelly, Shackelford, and Roper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akiyama H (1980) Surgery for carcinoma for the esophagus. Curr Probl Surg 17: 56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson KD, Randolph JG (1978) Gastric tube interposition: a satisfactory alternative to the colon for esophageal replacement in children. Ann Thorac Surg 25: 521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belsey R (1965) Reconstruction of the esophagus with the left colon. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 49: 33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow JC, Cannon JP, Elkins RC (1979) Colon interposition for benign esophageal disease. Am J Surg 137: 175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich HJ (1975) Reversed gastric tube (RGT) esophagoplasty for failure of colon, jejunum and prosthetic interpositions. Ann Surg 182: 154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JP, Shackelford GD, Roper CL (1983) Esophageal replacement in children: functional results and long-term growth. Ann Thorac Surg 36: 634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mansour KA, Hansen HA II, Hersh T, Miller JI Jr et al. (1981) Colon interposition for advanced nonmalignant esophageal stricture: experience with 40 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 32: 584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moylan JP Jr, Bell JW, Cantrell JR, Merendino KA (1970) The jejunal interposition operation: a follow-up on seventeen patients followed 10–17 years. Ann Surg 172: 205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orringer MB, Kirsh MM, Sloan H (1977) Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: technical considerations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 73: 807

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orringer MB, Orringer JS (1982) Esophagectomy. Definitive treatment for esophageal neuromotor dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg 34: 237

    Google Scholar 

  • Orringer MB, Orringer JS (1983) Esophagectomy without thoracotomy: a dangerous operation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 85: 72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orringer MB, Sloan H (1978) Esophagectomy without thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 76: 643

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Payne WS (1970) Surgical treatment of reflux esophagitis and stricture associated with permanent incompetence of the cardia. Mayo Clin Proc 45: 553

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polk HC Jr (1980) Jejunal interposition for reflux esophagitis and esophageal stricture unresponsive to valvuloplasty. World J Surg 4: 741

    Google Scholar 

  • Royston CMS, Dowling BL, Spencer J (1975) Antrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis in the treatment of peptic oesophagitis with stricture. Br J Surg 62: 605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Payne WS (1975) Surgical technique for management of reflux esophagitis after esophagogastrectomy for malignancy. Further application of Roux-en-Y principle. Mayo Clin Proc 50: 588

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins EW Jr (1980) Long-segment colon substitute for the esophagus. Ann Surg 192: 722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chassin, J.L. (1984). Operations to Replace or Bypass the Esophagus: Colon or Jejunum Interposition; Gastric Pull-Up. In: Operative Strategy in General Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4172-8_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4172-8_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4174-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4172-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics