Operations for Esophageal Perforations and Anastomotic Leaks

  • Jameson L. Chassin

Abstract

Although several retrospective studies of esophageal perforations have identified groups of patients who survived with conservative therapy, it must be emphasized that these patients must be carefully selected. When a patient sustains a small perforation of the cervical esophagus following elective esophagoscopy and has minimal symptoms, both local and systemic, nonoperative management by means of antibiotics and intravenous feeding may prove successful. On the other hand, a spontaneous perforation of the thoracic esophagus following a bout of retching in a gourmand with a full stomach should always be treated by prompt operation. Otherwise, a fulminating necrotizing mediastinitis will develop because the chest has been flooded by the powerful digestive ferments of the stomach and duodenum. Nonoperative management is acceptable only in patients who have experienced a contained leak with minimal symptoms and no sign of systemic sepsis.

Keywords

Anastomotic Leak Esophageal Perforation Thoracic Esophagus Cervical Esophagus Abdominal Esophagus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott OA, Mansour KA, Logan WD Jr et al. Atraumatic so-called “spontaneous” rupture of the esophagus: a review of 47 personal cases with comments on a new method of surgical therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1970;59:67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardini R, Bonavina L, Pavanello M. Temporary double exclusion of the perforated esophagus using absorbable staples. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:1165–1167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cameron JL, Keiffer RF, Hendrix TR, Mehigan DG et al. Selective nonoperative management of contained intrathoracic esophageal disruptions. Ann Thorac Surg 1979;27:404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldstein LA, Thompson WR. Esophageal perforations: a 15 year experience. Am J Surg 1982;143:495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gouge TH, Depan HJ, Spencer F. Experience with the Grillo pleural wrap procedure in 18 patients with perforation of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 1989; 209:612–619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grillo HC, Wilkins EW Jr. Esophageal repair following late diagnosis of intrathoracic perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 1975;20:387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Maroney TP, Ring EJ, Gordon RL et al. Role of interventional radiology in the management of major esophageal leaks. Radiology 1989;170:1055–1057.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. McKinnon WMP, Ochsner JL. Immediate closure and Heller procedure after Mosher bag rupture of the esophagus. Am J Surg 1974;127:115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Michel L, Grillo HC, Malt RA. Operative and nonoperative management of esophageal perforations. Ann Surg 1981;194:57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Orringer MB, Stirling MC. Esophagectomy for esophageal disruption. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:35–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pate JW, Walker WA, Cole FH Jr et al. Spontaneous rupture of the esophagus: a 30-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;47:689–692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rosoff S, White T. Perforation of the esophagus. Am J Surg 1974;128:207–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sarr MG, Pemberton JH, Payne WS. Management of instrumental perforations of the esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982;84:211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Skinner DB, Little AG, DeMeester TR. Management of esophageal perforation. Am J Surg 1980;139:760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Thal AP, Hatafuku T. Improved operation for esophageal rupture. JAMA 1964;188:826.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Triggiani E, Betsey R. Oesophageal trauma: incidence, diagnosis, and management. Thorax 1977;32:241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Urschel HC Jr, Razzuk MA, Wood RE, Gailbraith N et al. Improved management of esophageal perforation: exclusion and diversion in continuity. Ann Surg 1974; 179:587.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilson SE, Stone R, Scully M, Ozeran L et al. Modern management of anastomotic leak after esophagogastrectomy. Am J Surg 1982;144:94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jameson L. Chassin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Clinical SurgeryNew York University School of MedicineNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryNew York Hospital Medical Center of QueensFlushingUSA

Personalised recommendations