Radiation in Video-Recorded Fluoroscopy

  • Thomas J. Beck
  • Bob W. Gayler

Abstract

Most swallowing specialists are aware that swallowing disorders are often best appreciated with the use of dynamically recorded fluoroscopic images. In the past, specialized cinefluorography systems were the dynamic recording method of choice. More recently, dynamic recording capability has become much more widely available with the use of inexpensive videotape recorders, easily connected to existing videofluoroscopy systems. Despite some loss of image quality, videotape-recorded fluoroscopy, or videofluorography (hereafter referred to as VTF) has many advantages over conventional cinefluorography systems in that it does not require specially designed x-ray equipment, and lacks the difficulties associated with handling, processing, and viewing of cine (movie) film. VTF, however, does involve radiation exposure to both patient and practitioner, and thus incorporates some risk.

Keywords

Organ Dose Lead Apron Radiation Worker Active Bone Marrow Gonadal Dose 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hall EJ: Radiobiology for the Radiologist, ed 3. Philadelphia, JB Lippincott, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations of the National Academy of Sciences— National Research Council: The Effects on Populations of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: 1980. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    1987 Annual Cancer Statistics Review, US Dept of Health and Human Services publication No. (NIH) 88–2789. Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements: Recommendations on Limits for Exposure to Ionizing Radiation, Report #91. Washington, DC, NCRP, 1987.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keriakes JG, Rosenstein M: Handbook of Radiation Doses in Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic X-Ray. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suleiman OH: Development of a Method to Calculate Organ Doses for the Upper Gastrointestinal Fluoroscopic Examination, doctoral thesis. The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas J. Beck
  • Bob W. Gayler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations