Linking Informatics and Change Management

  • Nancy M. Lorenzi
  • Robert T. Riley
Part of the Health Informatics Series book series (HI)


The changes we will see in our healthcare systems over the next 10 years will make us someday reminisce about the past decade as the relatively stable “good old days.”While we will continue to see new drugs, new devices, and new techniques introduced at a rapid pace, the true megachanges will center on gathering, managing, and using clinical information—including whole new types of information unavailable to today’s clinicians. This megachange will affect all the areas of health care—administrative, clinical, teaching, and research. The true reengineering of our healthcare information management infrastructure is only in its early stages. Even more dramatic changes lie ahead for the various roles and responsibilities within healthcare systems. These changes will be driven by the requirements for improved access to health care, the expectation of quality health care provided at lower cost, the development of vertically and horizontally integrated delivery systems, the increased emphasis upon wellness, and the transition to medicine based on an understanding of the human genome.1


Organizational Change Change Management Quality Health Care Organizational Outcome Organizational Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lorenzi NM, Riley RT, Blyth AJC, Southon G, Dixon BJ. Antecedents of the people and organizational aspects of medical informatics: review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4: 79–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cutcliffe SH, et al. New Worlds, New Technologies, New Issues. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bailey JRS. Managing People and Technological Change. London: Pitman, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keller T, Savage EN. Administrative Information Systems: People and Technology. Boston: Kent, 1987.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Forester T. Computers in the Human Context: Information Technology, Productivity, and People. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davenport TH. Saving IT’s soul, human-centered information management. Harvard Business Rev 1994; 72: 119–133.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pancer S, George M, Gebotys RJ. Understanding and predicting attitudes towards computers. Comput Hum Behav 1992; 8: 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S. Changing the role of top management: beyond systems to people. Harvard Business Rev 1995; 73: 132–142.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davenport TH. Information politics. Sloan Manag Rev 1992;Fall:53–65.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Benjamin RI, Levinson E.A framework for managing IT—enabled change. Sloan Manag Rev 1993;Summer:23–33.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keen PGW. Information systems and organizational change. Commun ACM 1981; 24 (1): 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aydin CE, Rice RE. Social worlds, individual differences and implementation: predicting attitudes toward a medical information system. Inform Manag 1991; 20: 119–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hebert M, Benbasat I. Adopting information technology in hospitals: the relationship between attitudes/expectations and behavior. Hosp Health Sery Admin 1994; 39 (3): 369–383.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaplan B, Duchon D. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: a case study. MIS Q 1988;December:570–586.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy M. Lorenzi
    • 1
  • Robert T. Riley
  1. 1.Informatics Center, Eskind Biomedical LibraryVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations