Seasonal Climatology of Tidal Non-Linearities in a Shallow Estuary

  • David G. Aubrey
  • Carl T. Friedrichs
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies book series (COASTAL, volume 29)


Hourly sea levels recorded over a 16-month period at eight tide gauges throughout the estuarine system at Murrells, South Carolina, clarify the climatology of tidal distortion within this shallow, well-mixed estuary. Numerical results are consistent with these data and suggest comparable behavior in other geometrically-similar systems. The non-linear tidal response to changes in the amplitude-to-depth ratio (a/h) are investigated utilizing the spring-neap cycle over a single month and the offshore steric response over an entire year or more. As a/h increases in Murrells estuary due to greater tidal amplitude, tidal distortion becomes more flood dominant. However, patterns of non-linear tidal distortion in response to lower frequency ocean level change are strongly dependent upon proximity to local concentrations of intertidal flats. In areas of small tidal flat extent, as a/h decreases (due to rising sea level), tidal distortion becomes less flood dominant; in areas of extensive flats, absolute distortion and, therefore, flood dominant nature grows with greater h. Numerical modeling of estuary sea height and tidal velocity support the observations, which are consistent with the hypotheses of Aubrey and Speer (1985) and Speer and Aubrey (1985). They also have implications for changes in estuarine response to accelerated sea-level rise in the near future.


Tidal Flat Tidal Channel Tidal Amplitude Garden City Tidal Height 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aubrey, D. G., 1986. Hydrodynamic controls on sediment transport in well-mixed bays and estuaries. In: van de Kreeke, J. (ed.), Physics of Shallow Estuarie and Bays. Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubrey, D. G. and Speer, P. E., 1985. A study of non-linear tidal propagation in shallow inlet/estuarine systems. Part I: Observations. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 21:185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boon, J.D. and Byrne, R.J., 1981. On basin hypsometry and the morphodynamic response of coastal inlet systems. Marine Geology, 40:27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boothroyd, J. C., 1969. Hydraulic conditions controlling the the formation of estuarine bedforms. In: Hayes, M.O. (ed.), Coastal Environments; N.E. Massachusetts and New Hampshire. Cont. No. 1-CRG, Univ. Massachusetts. Dept. of Geology Publication Series, Amherst, MA, p. 417–427.Google Scholar
  5. Dronkers, J. J., 1964. Tidal Computations in Rivers and Coastel Waters. North Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, 516 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Dronkers, J.J., 1986. Tidal asymmetry and estuarine morphology. Neth. J. Sea Res., 20:117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DuBar, J. R., Johnson, H.S., Thorn, B. and Hatchell, W.O., 1974. Neogene stratigraphy and morphology, south flank of the Cape Fear Arch, North and South Carolina. In: Oaks, R. Q. and DuBar, J. R. (eds.), Post-Miocene Stratigraphy: Central and Southern Atlantic Coastal Plain. Utah State Univ. Press, Logan, Utah, p. 140–173.Google Scholar
  8. Emery, K. O., 1967. Estuaries and lagoons in relation to continental shelves. In: Lauff, G. H. (ed.), Estuaries. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Publ. 83, Washington, DC, p. 9–11.Google Scholar
  9. Friedrichs, C. T. and Aubrey, D. G., in press. Non-linear tidal distortion in shallow well-mixed estuaries: a synthesis. Est. Coast Shelf Sci.Google Scholar
  10. Fry, V.A., 1987. Tidal Velocity Asymmetries and Bedload Transport in Shallow Water Embayments. M.S. thesis, WHOI-MIT Joint Program in Oceanography, Woods Hole, MA, 50 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffman, J. S., Keyes, D. and Titus, J. G., 1983. Projecting Future Sea Level Rise, Methodology, Estimates to the Year 2100, and Research Needs. U.S. EPA 230–09-007, 121 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Masch, F. D., Brandes, R. J. and Reagan, J. D., 1977. Comparison of numerical and physical hydraulic models, Mansonboro Inlet, North Carolina. Apendix 2, v. 1, Numerical Simulation of Hydrodynamics (WRE). GITI Report 6, U.S. Army Coastal Eng. Res. Cent., 123 pp.Google Scholar
  13. National Research Council (NRC), 1979. Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 496 pp.Google Scholar
  14. National Ocean Service, 1984. Index of tide stations: United States of America and miscellaneous other locations. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 140 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Perry, F. C., Seabergh, W. C. and Lane, E. F., 1978. Improvements for Murrells Inlet, South Carolina. U.S. Army Engineer District, Charleston, and U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississipi. Technical Report H-78–4, 339 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Postma, H., 1967. Sediment transport and sedimentation in the marine environment. In: Lauff, G. H. (ed.), Estuaries. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Publ. 83, Washington, DC, p. 158–179.Google Scholar
  17. Richards, H. G., 1974. Structural and stratigraphic framework of the Atlantic Coastal Plain. In: Oaks, R. Q. and DuBar, J. R. (eds.), Post-Miocent Stratigraphy: Central and Southern Atlantic Coastal Plain. Utah State Univ. Press, Logan, Utah, p. 10–20.Google Scholar
  18. Speer, P. E. and Aubrey, D. G., 1985. A study of non-linear tidal propagation in shallow inlet/estuarine systems. Part II: Theory. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 21:207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • David G. Aubrey
    • 1
  • Carl T. Friedrichs
    • 1
  1. 1.Woods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA

Personalised recommendations