Skip to main content

Pitfalls and Their Avoidance

  • Chapter
  • 494 Accesses

Abstract

Almost all patients who sustain a femoral neck fracture should have operative treatment. Nonoperative treatment of an impacted femoral neck fracture, although advocated by some, is not recommended. Peter et al. reported a fracture displacement rate of 42% in older patients treated nonoperatively after sustaining Garden type I impacted femoral neck fractures1; when the fracture resulted in retroversion of the femoral head by more than 40°, loss of reduction occurred in 100% of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Peter R, Bedat B, Rossier J, Hoffmeyer P. Impacted Garden I fractures of the femoral neck (31-B1): operative vs. nonoperative treatment? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, Louisville, KY, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoffman A, Jons R, Schoenvogel R. Pudendal nerve neuropraxia as a result of traction on the fracture table. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64:136–138.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meyers M, Harvey J, Moore T. The muscle pedicle graft in the treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck. Orthop Clin North Am 1974; 5:779–792.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lyon T, Koval KJ, Kummer F, Zuckerman JD. Pudendal nerve palsy induced by fracture table. Orthop Rev 1993; 22:521–525.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kruger D, Kayner D, Hankin F, et al. Traction force profiles associated with the use of a fracture table. J Orthop Trauma 1990; 4:283–286.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Toolan BC, Koval KJ, Kummer FJ, et al. Effects of supine positioning and fracture post placement on the perineal countertraction force in awake volunteers. J Orthop Trauma 1995; 9:164–170.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Madsen F, Linde F, Anderson E, et al. Fixation of displaced femoral fractures: a comparison between sliding screw plate and four cancellous bone screws. Acta Orthop Scand 1987; 58:212–216.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Skinner PW, Powles D. Compression screw fixation for displaced subcapital fracture of the femur: success or failure. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986; 68:78–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mizrahi J, Harlon HS, Taylor JK, Solomon L. Investigation of load transfer and optimum pin configuration in the internal fixation by Muller screws of fractured femoral necks. Med Biol Eng Comput 1980; 18:319–325.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lehman W, Menche D, Grant A, et al. The problem of evaluating in situ pinning of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an experimental model and review of 63 consecutive cases. J Pediatr Orthop 1984; 4:297–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zuckerman JD. Comprehensive Care of Orthopaedic Injuries in the Elderly. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnston CE, Ripley LP, Bray CB. Primary endoprosthetic replacement for acute femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop 1982; 167:123–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson G, Nielson J. Results after arthroplasty of the hip with Moore’s prosthesis. Acta Orthop Scand 1972; 43:397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Salvati EA, Artz T, Aglietti P, Asnis SE. Endoprostheses in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 1977; 5:757–777.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kwok DC, Cruess RL. A retrospective study of Moore and Thompson hemiarthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1982; 169:179–185.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Whittaker R, Sotos L, Ralston E. Fractures of the femur about femoral endoprostheses. J Trauma 1974; 14:675–694.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang WS, Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, Frankel VH. Biomechanical evaluation of anatomic reduction versus medial displacement osteotomy in unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Clin Orthop 1987; 225:141–146.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rokito AS, Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Technical pitfalls in the use of the sliding hip screw for fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Contemp Orthop 1993; 26:349–356.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi J. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77:1058–1064.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kyle RF, Wright TM, Burstein AH. Biomechanical analysis of the sliding characteristics of compression hip screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980; 62:1308–1314.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gundle R, Gargan MF, Simpson AHRW. How to minimize failures of fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Injury 1995; 26:611–614.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Baumgaertner M, Curtin S, Lindskog D. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop 1998; 348:87–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Russell TA, Taylor JC. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG, eds. Skeletal Trauma. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1992:1485–1524.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kinast C, Bolhofner BR, Mast JW, Ganz R. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: results of treatment with the 95-degree condylar blade plate. Clin Orthop 1989; 238:122–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Riemer B, Butterfield S, Ray R, Daffner R. Clandestine femoral neck fractures with ipsilateral diaphyseal fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1993; 7:443–449.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Swiontkowski MF. Ipsilateral femoral shaft and hip fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 1987; 18:73–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson KD, Tenscer AF, Sherman MC. Biomechanical factors affecting fracture stability and femoral bursting in closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures with illustrative case presentations. J Orthop Trauma 1987; 1:1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brumback RJ, Reilly JP, Poka A, et al. Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: part I. Decision making errors with interlocking fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70:1441–1452.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koval, K.J., Zuckerman, J.D. (2000). Pitfalls and Their Avoidance. In: Hip Fractures. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4052-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4052-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4054-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4052-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics